Feeding the Algorithm? Strategies of Technosensation in Artistic Project Based on Bio-Parametrisation’s Techniques
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEFeeding the Algorithm? Strategies of Technosensation in Artistic Project Based on Bio-Parametrisation’s Techniques
Publication date: 2022
Arts & Cultural Studies Review, 2022, Issue 3 (53) Technology between empowerment and exclusion, pp. 382 - 403
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.22.026.16615Authors
Feeding the Algorithm? Strategies of Technosensation in Artistic Project Based on Bio-Parametrisation’s Techniques
The article investigates various kinds of the strategies of technosensation in artistic project based on bio-parametrisation’s techniques. The category of technosensation is in the article referred to the considerations of Luciana Parisi and Marie-Luise Angerer to define the relationship between body affectivity and computational systems (primarily in relation to automated decision-making systems and machine learning processes). The context for these considerations is the reflection on “technological redlining” as a strategy for racial, gender, and (dis)ability profiling of computational systems, which generate social exclusion, inequalities and oppressiveness. In the article, the author considers (with reference to the considerations of Parisi, Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui and Gabbrielle M. Johnson) to what extent the algorithmic biases are the result of automation, and to what extent they result from the absorption of uncertainty, randomness and technodiversity. Technosensation strategies are considered in relation to the artistic practices of Zach Blas, Maja Smrekar, Marija Griniuk and others, pointing to subversive, critical and affirmative variants of technological functionality and agency. The presented projects prove that the functionality of computational technologies is not bipolar, but it is developing as a spectrum of nuanced mechanisms, both in the area of oppressive-exclusionary systems and emancipatory strategies
Alaimo S., Transcorporeality [in:] R. Braidotti, M. Hlavajova (eds.), Posthuman Glossary, Bloomsbury Publishing, London 2018, pp. 435–438.
Angerer M.-L., Affective Milieus: Intensive Couplings, Technical Sentience, and a Nonconscious In-between [in:] B. Bösel, S. Wiemer (eds.), Affective Transformations: Politics – Algorithms – Media, Meson Press, Lüneburg 2020, pp. 87–99.
Benjamin R., Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, Polity Press, Cambridge 2019.
Braidotti R., The Posthuman, Polity Press, Cambridge 2013.
Brock Jr. A., Distributed Blackness: African American Cybercultures, New York University Press, New York 2020.
Ceyhan A., Technologization of Security: Management of Uncertainty and Risk in the Age of Biometrics, “Surveillance & Society” 2008, vol. 5 (2), pp. 102–123.
Dael N., Mortillaro M., Scherer K.R., The Body Action and Posture Coding System (BAP): Development and Reliability, “Journal of Nonverbal Behavior” 2012, vol. 36 (2), pp. 97–121.
Day S., Lury C., Biosensing: Tracking Persons [in:] D. Nafus (ed.), Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life, MIT Press, Cambridge–London 2016, pp. 43–66.
Delanty G., Biopolitics in the Risk Society: The Possibility of a Global Ethic of Societal Responsibility [in:] P. O’Mahony (ed.), Nature, Risk and Responsibility: Discourses of Biotechnology, Routledge, New York 1999, pp. 37–51.
Deleuze G., Difference and Repetition, Athlone, London 1994.
Gates K.A., Our Biometric Future: Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance, New York University Press, New York 2011.
Giraud E.H., What Comes after Entanglement? Activism, Anthropocentrism, and an Ethics of Exclusion, Duke University Press, Durham–London 2019.
Griniuk M., Performance Art Using Biometric Data, “Art History & Criticism” 2021, vol. 17 (1), pp. 101–112.
Haraway D., Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Duke University Press Books, Durham 2016.
Hayles N.K., Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago–London 2017.
Hui Y., For a Planetary Thinking, “e-flux” 2020, no. 114, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/114/366703/for-a-planetary-thinking/ (accessed: 12.06.2022).
Hui Y., Writing and Cosmotechnics, “Derrida Today” 2020, vol. 13 (1), pp. 17–32.
Johnson G.M., Algorithmic Bias: On the Implicit Biases of Social Technology, “Synthese” 2021, vol. 198 (1), pp. 1–22.
Lasker G.W., The Place of Anthropometry in Human Biology [in:] S.J. Ulijaszek, C.G.N. Mascie-Taylor (eds.), Anthropometry: The Individual and the Population, Cambridge University Press, New York 1994, pp. 3–5.
Liljefors M., Lee-Morrison L., Mapped Bodies: Notes on the Use of Biometrics in Geopolitical Contexts, “Socioaesthetics” 2015, vol. 19 (2), pp. 53–72.
Liljefors M., Lundin S., Wiszmeg A. (eds.), The Atomized Body: The Cultural Life of Stem Cells, Genes, and Neurons, Nordic Academic Press, Nordic Academic Press, Lund 2012.
Lowenhaupt Tsing A., On Nonscalability: The Living World Is Not Amenable to Precision-Nested Scale, “Common Knowledge” 2012, vol. 18 (3), pp. 505–524.
Magnet S.A., When Biometrics Fail: Gender, Race, and the Technology of Identity, Duke University Press, Durham–London 2011.
Mancini C., Animal-Computer Interaction (ACI): A Manifesto, “Interactions” 2011, vol. 18 (4), pp. 69–73.
Milan S., Social Movements and Their Technologies: Wiring Social Change, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2013.
Neff G., Nafus D., Self-Tracking, MIT Press, Cambridge–London 2016.
Nemer D., Technology of the Oppressed: Inequity and the Digital Mundane in Favelas of Brazil, MIT Press, Cambridge 2022.
O’Neil C., Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, Crown Publishing Group, New York 2016.
Ożóg M., Życie w krzemowej klatce. Sztuka nowych mediów jako krytyczna analiza praktyk cyfrowego nadzoru, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2018.
Parisi L., Digital Automation and Affect [in:] M.-L. Angerer, B. Bösel, M. Ott (eds.), Timing of Affect: Epistemologies, Aesthetics, Politics, diaphanes, Berlin 2014, pp. 161–177.
Parisi L., Ferreira da Silva D., Black Feminist Tools, Critique, and Techno-poethics, “e-flux” 2021, no. 123, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/123/436929/black-feminist-tools-critique-and-techno-poethics/ (accessed: 11.06.2022).
Parisi L., Hörl E., Was heißt Medienästhetik? Ein Gespräch über algorithmische Ästhetik, automatisches Denken und die postkybernetische Logik der Komputation, “Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft: Medienästhetik” 2013, no. 8, pp. 35–51.
Parisi L., Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Capitalism, and the Incomputable [in:] M. Pasquinelli (ed.), Alleys of Your Mind: Augmented Intelligence and Its Traumas, Meson Press, Lüneburg 2015, pp. 125–137.
Ploeg I. van der, The Illegal Body: ‘Eurodac’ and the Politics of Biometric Identification, “Ethics and Information Technology” 1999, vol. 1 (4), pp. 295–302.
Ratto M., Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life, “The Information Society” 2011, vol. 27 (4), pp. 252–260.
Report Use of Biometric Data to Identify Terrorists: Best Practice or Risky Business?, https://www.kpsrl.org/publication/use-of-biometric-data-to-identify-terrorists-best-practice-or-risky-business (accessed: 20.05.2022).
Schuller B.W., Multimodal Affect Databases: Collection, Challenges, and Chances [in:] R.A. Calvo, S.K. D’Mello, J. Gratch, A. Kappas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Affective Computing, Oxford University Press, New York 2015, pp. 323–333.
Składanek M., Sztuka generatywna. Metoda i praktyki, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2017.
Stengers I., Wondering About Materialism [in:] L. Bryant, N. Srnicek, G. Harman (eds.), Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, re.press, Melbourne 2011, pp. 368–380.
Stiegler B., Noodiversity, Technodiversity, trans. D. Ross, “Angelaki” 2020, vol. 25 (4), pp. 67–80.
Twardoch-Raś E., Sztuka biometryczna w perspektywie filozofii post- i transhumanizmu. W stronę estetyki postafektywnej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2021.
Umoja Noble S., Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, New York University Press, New York 2018.
Wang Y., Kosinski M., Deep Neural Networks Are More Accurate Than Humans at Detecting Sexual Orientation from Facial Images, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 2018, vol. 114 (2), pp. 246–257.
Zdrodowska M., Telefon, kino i cyborgi. Wzajemne relacje niesłyszenia i techniki, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2021.
Project’s websites
Blackbird Web Browser: https://download.cnet.com/Blackbird-Web-Browser/3000-2356_4-10912569.html (accessed: 10.06.2022).
Blas Zach, “Body Horror”: https://zachblas.info/works/body-horror/ (accessed: 28.05.2022); “Sanctum”: https://zachblas.info/works/sanctum/ (accessed: 28.05.2022).
Buolamwini Joy, “Gender Shades”: http://gendershades.org/ (accessed: 2.06.2022).
Griniuk Marija, “The Tests: Techno-Voyeurism into a Performing Body, Mark Making”: https://marija.griniuk.nu/gallery.html (accessed: 15.06.2022).
Obadike Keith, “Blackness for Sale”: https://elmcip.net/creative-work/blackness-sale (accessed: 8.06.2022).
Paglen Trevor, Crawford Kate, “ImageNet Roulette”: https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/2019/ImageNet-Roulette-cambridge-2017.html (accessed: 2.06.2022).
Smrekar Maja, “Not brute force”: https://nonbruteforce.net/research-6 (accessed: 5.06.2022).
Information: Arts & Cultural Studies Review, 2022, Issue 3 (53) Technology between empowerment and exclusion, pp. 382 - 403
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Feeding the Algorithm? Strategies of Technosensation in Artistic Project Based on Bio-Parametrisation’s Techniques
Feeding the Algorithm? Strategies of Technosensation in Artistic Project Based on Bio-Parametrisation’s Techniques
Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Institute of Audiovisual Arts, Kraków
Poland
Published at: 2022
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 566
Number of downloads: 351