To See Invisible: Poland's Wedding to the Sea
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEZobaczyć niewidoczne, czyli o tym, jak Polska zaślubiała morze
Publication date: 25.05.2015
Ethnographies, 2014, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp. 335 - 348
https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.14.022.3551Authors
Zobaczyć niewidoczne, czyli o tym, jak Polska zaślubiała morze
To See Invisible: Poland's Wedding to the Sea
Policies are not only being expressed by symbols and rituals, but their transmission and the use are being shaped by symbolic meanings. They teach how to understand world, putting it in order and help to overcome feeling of the chaos. To a large extent a so-called political reality is being created by symbolic meanings, even if it is hard for us to be reconciled with it. With the help of the appropriate selected set of multi-sensual, dramatic measures the political ritual allows more or less to capture participants and shape social imagination according to intentions of his organizers. Reconstructing or confirming existing political order the official ceremony with its performative nature tries with similar power as the ritual to involve its participants, seeks to generate feeling and images preferred by the authority.
10 January 1920, in accordance with provisions of the Treaty of Versailles the Republic of Poland took back Pomerania (annexed by Kingdom of Prussia in 1772 during First Partition of Poland). According to this, the special celebration was organized on the Puck Bay one month later. An episode with throwing the platinum ring into waters of the Baltic, called Poland’s Wedding to the Sea became soon the most important event in the great national story about the return of Pomerania to the motherland. It established the paradigmatic pattern for another state celebrations, which confirmed the northern boundary of Poland symbolically and state’s territorial integrity. Events in 1945 and 2010 were the variants of Poland’s Wedding to the Sea settled in their own historical context. On the one hand these ceremonies served as performative instruments for national legitimization of the power, but on the other hand they were used by political elites for creating and playing their own, different vision of the state.
Baczko B.
1994 Wyobrażenia społeczne. Szkice o nadziei i pamięci zbiorowej, Warszawa.
Baudrillard J.
2006 Społeczeństwo konsumpcyjne. Jego mity i struktury, Warszawa.
Buchowski M.
2010 Polskie dyskursy o krwi, ziemi i narodzie, [w:] Antropologia polityki i polityka w antropologii, red. M. Drozd-Piasecka, A. Pozern-Zieliński, Warszawa, s. 42–64.
Čolovič I.
2001 Polityka symboli, Kraków.
Dohnal W.
2013 Od polityki pierwotnej do postpolityki. Z dziejów anglosaskiej antropologii politycznej, Poznań.
Douglas M.
1982 In the Active Voice, London–Boston.
Geertz C.
2006 Negara. Państwo-teatr na Bali w XIX wieku, Kraków.
Golonka-Czajkowska M.
2010 „Gdzie moi żołnierze tam i ja”. Postać Emilii Gierczak w heroicznym micie o zdobyciu Kołobrzegu, [w:] Kołobrzeg i okolice poprzez wieki, red. R. Ptaszyński, Szczecin,
s. 221–244.
Handelman D.
1998 Models and Mirrors. Towards an Anthropology of Public Events, New York.
Janion M.
2007 Płacz generała, Warszawa.
Kertzer D.
1988 Ritual, Politics and Power, Yale.
Krasucki E.
2010 Zaślubiny w morzem – powojenny mit założycielski Kołobrzegu. Kilka uwag wokół nieco wstydliwej publikacji, [w:] Kołobrzeg i okolice poprzez wieki, red. R. Ptaszyński, Szczecin, s. 297–319.
Kroczyński H.
1989 Zaślubiny Polski z morzem, Koszalin.
Lepszy K.
1947 Dzieje floty polskiej, Gdańsk.
MacAloon J.
2009 Igrzyska olimpijskie a teoria widowisk w społeczeństwach współczesnych, [w:] Rytuał, dramat, święto, spektakl. Wstęp do teorii widowiska kulturowego, red. J. MacAloon, Warszawa, s. 360–419.
Moore S., Meyerhoff B. (red.)
1977 Secular Ritual, Amsterdam–Assen.
Odyniec W.
1982 Polskie dominium Maris Baltici, Warszawa.
Schechner R.
2011 Wymiary performansu, [w:] Antropologia doświadczenia, red. V. Turner, E. Bruner, Kraków, s. 364–389.
Sroga A.
1985 Na drodze stał Kołobrzeg, Warszawa.
Turner V.
2005 Od rytuału do dramatu, Warszawa.
2010 Proces rytualny. Struktura i antystruktura, Warszawa.
Zaremba M.
2001 Komunizm, legitymizacja, nacjonalizm. Nacjonalistyczna legitymizacja władzy komunistycznej w Polsce, Warszawa.
Information: Ethnographies, 2014, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp. 335 - 348
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Zobaczyć niewidoczne, czyli o tym, jak Polska zaślubiała morze
To See Invisible: Poland's Wedding to the Sea
Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland
Published at: 25.05.2015
Article status: Open
Licence: None
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
Polish