FAQ
Jagiellonian University in Krakow logo

Arab customary law and the modern Western idea of restorative justice

Publication date: 21.06.2017

The Polish Journal of the Arts and Culture. New Series, 2017, 5 (1/2017), pp. 31 - 50

https://doi.org/10.4467/24506249PJ.17.002.6809

Authors

,
Ewa Górska
Department of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-5486 Orcid
All publications →
Jan Bazyli Klakla
Department of Sociology of Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1141-4527 Orcid
All publications →

Titles

Arab customary law and the modern Western idea of restorative justice

Abstract

Arab customary conflict resolution and the alternative Western approach to dispute resolution are both the result of a similar way of administering justice – a restorative justice paradigm. Thus, we argue that it is not a new or a strictly western concept given that its fundamental values or even structures have existed in the customary laws of different cultures, like Arab culture, for centuries. In this article, we compare Western restorative justice institutions with the Arab customary conflict resolution process (sulh) used in contemporary Palestine.

References

1. Abu-Nimer M., Nasser I., Forgiveness in The Arab and Islamic Contexts: Between Theology and Practice, “Journal of Religious Ethics” 41 (3/2013), pp. 474–494.

2. Barzilai G., Fantasies of Liberalism and Liberal Jurisprudence: State Law, Politics, and the Israeli-Arab-Palestinian Community, “Israel Law Review” 34 (2/2000), pp. 425–451.

3. Birzeit University Institute of Law, Informal Justice, Rule of Law an1. Abu-Nimer M., Nasser I., Forgiveness in The Arab and Islamic Contexts: Between Theology and Practice, “Journal of Religious Ethics” 41 (3/2013), pp. 474–494.

2. Barzilai G., Fantasies of Liberalism and Liberal Jurisprudence: State Law, Politics, and the Israeli-Arab-Palestinian Community, “Israel Law Review” 34 (2/2000), pp. 425–451.

3. Birzeit University Institute of Law, Informal Justice, Rule of Law and Dispute Resolution in Palestine. National Report on Field Research Results, 2006.

4. Bosworth C. E., van Donzel E., Heinrichs W. P., Lecomte G., Encyclopaedia of Islam, Brill, Leiden 1997.

5. Choi J. J., Gilbert M., ‘Joe everyday, people off the street’: A Qualitative Study on Mediators’ Roles and Skills in Victim–offender Mediation, “Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice” 13 (2/2010), pp. 207–227.

6. Cunneen C., Reviving Restorative Justice Traditions [in:] Handbook of Restorative Justice, G. Johnstone, D. W. van Ness (ed.), Willan Publishing, Portland 2007, pp. 113–131.

7. Foley T., Developing Restorative Justice Jurisprudence. Rethinking Responses to Criminal Wrongdoing, Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington 2014.

8. Hajjah A. M., Al-Urf al-sha’ri fi-l-islah ح في العشائري العرف

9. Haley J., Victim-Offender Mediation: Lessons from the Japanese Experience, “Mediation Quarterly” 12 (3/19950), pp. 233–248.

10. Johnstone G., van Ness D. W., The Meaning of Restorative Justice [in:] Handbook of Restorative Justice, G. Johnstone, D. W. van Ness (ed.), Willan Publishing, Portland 2007, pp. 5–23.

11. Lane E. W., Arabic-English Lexicon, Willams & Norgate, London 1863. 

12. Lang S., Sulha Peacemaking and the Politics of Persuasion, “Journal of Palestine Studies” 31 (3/2002), pp. 52–66.

13. Marshall T. F., Restorative Justice on Trial in Britain, “Mediation Quarterly” 12 (3/1995), pp. 217–231.

14. Maxwell G. Crossing Cultural Boundaries: Implementing Restorative Justice in International and Indigenous Contexts [in:] Restorative Justice: From Theory to Practice, H. V. Miller, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley 2008, pp. 81–95.

15. New Zealand Ministry of Social Development, Family Group Conferences, 2014, [www 02].

16. Pely D., Resolving Clan-Based Disputes Using the Sulha, the Traditional Dispute Resolution Process of the Middle East, “Dispute Resolution Journal” 64 (4/Nov 2008 – Jan 2009), pp. 80–88.

17. Pely D., Honor: The Sulha’s Main Dispute Resolution Tool, “Conflict Resolution Quarterly” 28 (1/2010), pp. 67–81.

18. Pely D., When Honor Trumps Basic Needs: The Role of Honor in Deadly Disputes within Israel’s Arab Community, “Negotiation Journal” 27, 2011, pp. 205–225.

19. Pely D., Where East Not Always Meets West: Comparing the Sulha Process to Western-Style Mediation and Arbitration, “Conflict Resolution Quarterly” 28 (4/2011), pp. 427–440.

20. Schacht J., Law and Justice, [in:] Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Islam, II (VIII), P. J. Bearman, T. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W. P. Hinrichs (ed.), E. J. Brill, Leiden 1964.

21. Tarabeih H., Shmueli D., Khamaisi R., Towards the Implementation of Sulha as a Cultural Peacemaking Method for Managing and Resolving  Environmental Conflicts among Arab Palestinians in Israel, “Journal of Peacebuilding & Development” 5 (1/2009), pp. 50–64. 

22. ten Dam C., How to Feud and Rebel: Violence-values among the Chechens and Albanians, “Iran and the Caucasus” 14, 2010, pp. 331–366.

23. Terris R., Inoue-Terris V., A Case Study of Third World Jurisprudence – Palestine: Conflict Resolution and Customary law in Neopatrimonial Society, “Berkeley Journal of International Law” 20, 2002, pp. 462–495.

24. ThabitM. S., Al-Qada al-asha’iri inda qaba’il Bir al-Saba, Filastin القضاء فلسطين - السبع بئر قبائل عند - العشائري [Tribal Law of Tribes of Beersheba, Palestine], not published, Ghaza 2006 غزة .

25. Tsafrir N., Arab Customary Law in Israel: Sulha Agreements and Israeli Courts, “Islamic Law and Society” 13 (1/2006), pp. 76–98.

26. Umbreit M., The Development and Impact of Victim-Offender Mediation in the United States, “Mediation Quarterly” 12 (3/1995), pp. 263–276.

27. Walker L., Conferencing: Western Application of Indigenous Peoples’ Conflict Resolution Practices, paper presented on “Fifth National Conference on Family and Community Violence Prevention”, Los Angeles 2001, pp. 1–25, [www 01].

28. Wyrick P., Costanzo M., Predictors of Client Participation in Victim- Offender Mediation, “Mediation Quarterly” 16 (3/1999), pp. 253–267.

29. Zehr H., Gohar A., The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Good Books, New York 2002.

30. Zienkiewicz A., Studum mediacji. Od teorii ku praktyce, Difin, Warszawa 2007.

Internet sources used:

[www 01] https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lorenn_Walker/publication/242181355_Conferencing_Western_ Application_of_Indigenous_Peoples’_Conflict_Resolution_Practices/links/55140cbe0cf283ee0834a1e3.pdf(access: 16.11.2016)

[www 02] https://www.mvcot.govt.nz/youth-justice/family-group-conferences/(access: 16.11.2016)d Dispute Resolution in Palestine. National Report on Field Research Results, 2006.

Information

Information: The Polish Journal of the Arts and Culture. New Series, 2017, 5 (1/2017), pp. 31 - 50

Article type: Original article

Titles:

English:

Arab customary law and the modern Western idea of restorative justice

Polish:

Arab customary law and the modern Western idea of restorative justice

Authors

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-5486

Ewa Górska
Department of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-5486 Orcid
All publications →

Department of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1141-4527

Jan Bazyli Klakla
Department of Sociology of Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1141-4527 Orcid
All publications →

Department of Sociology of Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland

Published at: 21.06.2017

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND  licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Ewa Górska (Author) - 50%
Jan Bazyli Klakla (Author) - 50%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English