The Negative Organisational Consequences of Average Leadership Skills. Case Studies Based on Ken Blanchard’s Paradigm

Jerzy Rosiński

Titles

Abstract

management science. It seems that the timeliness of the organizational leadership topic comes not only from the importance of managing teams of workers, but also from the changes that are taking place in: attitudes employees, the expectations of the organization and in the organizational environment. It causes the need for continuous reflection, because solutions adequate a couple of years ago, may not be conformed to contemporary situation. Organizational leadership is an interesting theme of reflection, because is an area of knowledge between management science and psychology. It is possible to venture the statement, that the reflection from one of these areas is enriched by the second one.

Research aims. An average level of managerial skills can be considered as “good enough”. However, does this mean that it is the same as “correct”? The article indicates that nowadays “average” is “too little”.

Methodology. On the basis of a few selected case studies of Polish organisations, the author presents the disadvantages of an average level of managerial skills. The analysis of the case studies and the particular types of organisational disorders will be based on the Situational Leadership Model developed by Ken Blanchard. The author analyses two situations in organisations: the leader using mainly styles S2 and S3 and the leader using mainly styles S1 and S4.

Key findings. The author shows the consequences of average level of managerial skills for: a single employee, the team, the effects for another organisational processes (recruitment, employee turnover). The article also describes the psychological mechanism (social game or the archetype) that is often the background of that kind of behaviour (S2–S3; S1–S4) in the organisation.

management science. It seems that the timeliness of the organizational leadership topic comes not only from the importance of managing teams of workers, but also from the changes that are taking place in: attitudes employees, the expectations of the organization and in the organizational environment. It causes the need for continuous reflection, because solutions adequate a couple of years ago, may not be conformed to contemporary situation. Organizational leadership is an interesting theme of reflection, because is an area of knowledge between management science and psychology. It is possible to venture the statement, that the reflection from one of these areas is enriched by the second one.

Research aims. An average level of managerial skills can be considered as “good enough”. However, does this mean that it is the same as “correct”? The article indicates that nowadays “average” is “too little”.

Methodology. On the basis of a few selected case studies of Polish organisations, the author presents the disadvantages of an average level of managerial skills. The analysis of the case studies and the particular types of organisational disorders will be based on the Situational Leadership Model developed by Ken Blanchard. The author analyses two situations in organisations: the leader using mainly styles S2 and S3 and the leader using mainly styles S1 and S4.

Key findings. The author shows the consequences of average level of managerial skills for: a single employee, the team, the effects for another organisational processes (recruitment, employee turnover). The article also describes the psychological mechanism (social game or the archetype) that is often the background of that kind of behaviour (S2–S3; S1–S4) in the organisation.

Keywords

leadership style, organisational psychology, relations in organisations

References

Abram, J. (2007). Language of Winnicott, A Dictionary of Winnicott’s Use of Words. Karnac Books: London.

Berne, E. (2010). W co grają ludzie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa.

Blanchard, K. et al., (2016). Przywództwo wyższego stopnia. Blanchard o przywództwie i tworzeniu efektywnych organizacji, wydanie II zmienione i rozszerzone. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa.

Cummings, T.G., Worley, Ch.G. (2009). Organization Development & Change, 9th Edition. South – Western Cengage Learning: Mason OH.

Czarniawska, B. (2010).Trochę inna teoria organizacji. POLTEXT: Warszawa.

Dilts, R. (1990). Changing Belief Systems with NLP. Meta Publications: Cupertino, California.

Dorczk, R. (2015). Zarządzanie i przywództwo w edukacji – gdzie jesteśmy i dokąd zmierzamy, w: Dorczak R., Mazurkiewicz G. (red.) Przywództwo edukacyjne. Próba zmiany. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.

Duhigg, Ch. (2013). Dlaczego robimy to, co robimy i jak można to zmienić w życiu i biznesie. Dom Wydawniczy PWN: Warszawa.

Duignan, P. Collins, V. (2003). Leadership challenges and ethical dilemmas in frontline service organizations’, in: Bennet N., Crawford M., Cartwright M. (eds.) Effective Educational Leadership, Open University Press in association with Paul Chapman Publishing: London.

Hersey, P. (1975). Situational Leadership: Some Aspects of Its Influence on Organizational Development, Ph. D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

Hersey, P.H., Blanchard, K.H., Johnson, D.E (2015). Management of Organizational Behavior – Leading Human Resources, 10th ed. Pearson Education: Upper Saddle River 2015.

Karpman, S. (1968). Fairy tales and script drama analysis. Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 7(26), 39–43.

Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing Organizations. Nelson Parker: Brussels.

Lees, R.J., Gabarro, J.J., DeLong, T.J. (2008). Dlaczego w warunkach hiperkonkurencji ważni są mentorzy, HBRP No. 65–66 July–August.

Maner, J. Czy potrafisz wymiennie stosować te dwa style przywództwa?, source: https://www.hbrp.pl/b/czy-potrafisz-wymiennie-stosowac-te-dwa-style-przywodztwa/lz9SpMBp [accessed: 16.06.2017].

Marzano, R.J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B.A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Murphy, D. (2007). Professional School Leadership – Dealing with Dilemas, Dundin Academic Press: Edinburgh.

Petriglieri, G. Dlaczego wybieramy liderów, którzy mają proste odpowiedzi, source: https://www.hbrp.pl/b/dlaczego-wybieramy-liderow-ktorzy-maja-proste-odpowiedzi/F66Uadjg [accessed: 16.06.2017].

Senge, P. (2008). Piąta dyscyplina. Materiały dla praktyka. Jak budować organizację uczącą się. Oficyna Wolters Kluwer Business: Kraków.

Western, S. (2012). An Overwiew of the Leadership Discourses, in: Preedy M., Bennet N., Wise Ch. (eds.) Educational Leadership, Context, Strategy and Collaboration, SAGE Publications: London.

Turek, A. (2015). Perfekcjonizm może zabić biznes. Nie jest dobrze mieć szefa perfekcjonistę ani samemu takim być, innpoland.pl, source: http://innpoland.pl/116957,perfekcjonizm-moze-zabic-twoj-biznes-nie-jest-dobrze-miec-szefa-perfekcjoniste-ani-samemu-takim-byc [accessed: 16.06.2017].

Information

Information: International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2017, Issue 16(4), pp. 165 - 184

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/24498939IJCM.17.043.8266

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

The Negative Organisational Consequences of Average Leadership Skills. Case Studies Based on Ken Blanchard’s Paradigm

English:

The Negative Organisational Consequences of Average Leadership Skills. Case Studies Based on Ken Blanchard’s Paradigm

Authors

Jerzy Rosiński

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8348-2839

The Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Institute of Economics, Finance and Management

Published at: 26.03.2018

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Percentage share of authors:

Jerzy Rosiński (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English

View count: 1036

Number of downloads: 1069

<p> The Negative Organisational Consequences of Average Leadership Skills. Case Studies Based on Ken Blanchard’s Paradigm</p>

Pobierz pełny tekst

Titles

Abstract

Keywords

References

Information

Authors