Basic Assumptions of Organizational Culture In Religiously Diverse Environments

Barbara Mazur

Titles

Abstract

Background. The framework of this study is guided by “organizational culture”, which directs the way people behave in an organization. Culture, together with religion is considered to be an influential source of basic cultural assumptions, cultural values and artifacts reflected in organizational culture.

Research aims. This paper explores the relationship between culture, religion and the culture of an organization at the level of basic assumptions. The research hypothesis is that religion, which is considered a factor of culture and is operationalized by cultural dimensions such as: individualism/collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance and masculinity/femininity affects the level of basic assumptions of organizational culture. The main objective of the paper is to build the model of organizational culture on the level of basic assumptions and test this model by two-fold verification in companies operating in different religious environments.

Methodology. The scope of the research is the organizational culture of two companies performing in Podlasie region. The method used in the research is comparative case study built on quantitative research techniques. Those techniques embrace two kinds of questionnaires addressed to the employees of both studied organizations.

Key findings. The study shows that cultural dimensions could be used to explore religion’s influence (Catholic and Orthodox) on an organizational culture.

Background. The framework of this study is guided by “organizational culture”, which directs the way people behave in an organization. Culture, together with religion is considered to be an influential source of basic cultural assumptions, cultural values and artifacts reflected in organizational culture.

Research aims. This paper explores the relationship between culture, religion and the culture of an organization at the level of basic assumptions. The research hypothesis is that religion, which is considered a factor of culture and is operationalized by cultural dimensions such as: individualism/collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance and masculinity/femininity affects the level of basic assumptions of organizational culture. The main objective of the paper is to build the model of organizational culture on the level of basic assumptions and test this model by two-fold verification in companies operating in different religious environments.

Methodology. The scope of the research is the organizational culture of two companies performing in Podlasie region. The method used in the research is comparative case study built on quantitative research techniques. Those techniques embrace two kinds of questionnaires addressed to the employees of both studied organizations.

Key findings. The study shows that cultural dimensions could be used to explore religion’s influence (Catholic and Orthodox) on an organizational culture.

Keywords

organizational culture, basic assumptions, religion, management

References

Alvesson, M., & Berg, P.O. (1992). Corporate Culture and Organizational Symbolism: An Overview. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Alvesson, M. (1993). The play of metaphors. In: J. Hassard, M. Parker (eds.), Postmodernism and Organizations. London: Sage.

Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding Organizational Culture. London: Sage Publications.

Buchanan, M., Iyer, R., & Karl, C.A. (1999). The case study in business research. Global Research Business, http://www.bechervaise.com/page/CaseStudies/ (access: 16.02.2015).

Gahan, P., & Abeysekera, L. (2009). What shapes an individual’s work values? An integrated model of the relationship between work values, national culture and self-Construal. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(1), 126–147.

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Mc Graw-Hill, London.

Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G.J. (2005). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Karczewski, L. (2008). Etyka biznesu: kulturowe uwarunkowania. Opole: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Opolskiej.

Kostera, M. (2010). Zarządzanie międzykulturowe. In: A.K. Koźmiński, W. Piotrowski (eds.), Zarządzanie. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 596–599.

Mazur, B. (2010). Cultural diversity in organizational theory and practice. Journal of Intercultural Management, 2(2), 5–15.

Mazur, B. (2012). Kultura organizacyjna w zróżnicowanym kulturowo otoczeniu. Białystok: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej.

Martin, J. (2002). Organizational Culture. Mapping the terrain. London–Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Meyerson, D., & Martin, J. (1987). Cultural change: An integration of three different views. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), 623–647.

Parboteeah, P.K., Paik, Y., & Cullen, J.B. (2010). Religious groups and work values: A focus on buddhism, christianity, hinduism, and islam. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(1), 51–67.

Pavett, C., & Morris, T. (1995). Management styles within a multinational corporation: A five country comparative study. Human Relations, 48(10).

Philips, M.E. (1990). Industry as a Cultural Grouping. Los Angeles: University of California. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation.

Ralston, D.A., Holt, D.H., Terpstra, R.H., & Yu, K.C. (1997). The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: A Study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1).

Sadowski, A. (2004). Zróżnicowania kulturowe mieszkańców województwa podlaskiego. In: K. Krzysztofek, A. Sadowski (eds.), Pogranicza i multikulturalizm w warunkach Unii Europejskiej: implikacje da wschodniego pogranicza Polski, t. 1. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.

Schein E.H. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco–Washington–London: Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Schein, E.H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco–Washington–London: Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Schein, E.H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Schultz, M. (1994). On Studying Organizational Cultures – Diagnosis and Understanding. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Shipper, F., Kincaid, J., Rotondo, D.M., & Hoffman, R.C. (2003). A cross-cultural exploratory study of the linkage between emotional intelligence and managerial effectiveness. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11, 171–191.

Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quartely, 28 / 3.

Søndergaard, M. (1994). Research note: Hofstede’s consequences: A study of reviews, Citations and replications. Organization Studies, 15(3), 447–456.

Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publ.

Yin, R.K. (2002). Case Study Research Design and Method. California: Sage Publications.

Information

Information: International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2015, Issue 14(3), pp. 115 - 132

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/24498939IJCM.15.007.4309

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

Basic Assumptions of Organizational Culture In Religiously Diverse Environments

English:

Basic Assumptions of Organizational Culture In Religiously Diverse Environments

Authors

Barbara Mazur

Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45a, Białystok, Poland

Published at: 30.11.2015

Article status: Open

Licence: None

Percentage share of authors:

Barbara Mazur (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English

View count: 2340

Number of downloads: 24237

<p> Basic Assumptions of Organizational Culture In Religiously Diverse Environments </p>

Pobierz pełny tekst

Titles

Abstract

Keywords

References

Information

Authors