FAQ

Frienemies de l’Antiquité: Aristide et Thémistocle vus par Plutarque

Publication date: 21.10.2022

ELECTRUM, 2022, Volume 29, pp. 147 - 160

https://doi.org/10.4467/20800909EL.22.010.15780

Authors

Lucia Visonà
Laboratoire ORIENT & MÉDITERRANÉE, Paris
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7236-7501 Orcid
All publications →

Titles

Frienemies de l’Antiquité: Aristide et Thémistocle vus par Plutarque

Abstract

In the Parallel Lives, Aristides and Themistocles are two antithetical characters. This opposition, already present in Herodotus’work and common to the literary tradition of the Persian wars, is particularly emphasized by Plutarch who shapes two characters endowed with opposing character traits who adopt completely different behaviors towards friends or wealth. This profound contrast is intended to highlight the collaboration between the two Athenians, ready to put aside personal differences to devote themselves together to the war against the Persians. The episode of reconciliation is in fact located, unlike other sources (Aristotle, Diodorus), before the battle of Salamis. However, Aristides and Themistocles do not limit themselves to settling their differences : they also take on the role of mediators during the war in order to address the disagreements between Athens and the other Greek cities and avoid hindering the common struggle against the barbarians. To do this, Plutarch adapts some passages of Herodotus (directly or by choosing sources that made such changes) to insert the protagonists of the Lives and create a climate of tension that they can happily resolve. His authorial choices appear consistent with the criticisms against Herodotus in De Herodoti Malignitate. The reflection about the Persian wars in Plutarch’s corpus seems therefore to be animated by a coherent vision, born from the tradition elaborated by the Attic orators in the fourth century : the conflict is seen as a privileged moment of the union between the Greeks, capable of overcoming the almost endemic rivalries that oppose them in view of the common good.

References

Download references
Bourriot, F. (1995), Kalos Kagathos—Kalokagathia. D’un terme de propagande de sophistes à une notion sociale et philosophique, Hildesheim–Zurich–New York.
Bowen, A. J. (1992), Plutarch, The Malice of Herodotus, Warminster.
Calabi Limentani, I. (1960), Aristide il Giusto. Fortuna di un nome, Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo 94 : 43–67.
Calabi Limentani, I. (1974), Plutarchi, Vita Aristidis, Firenze.
Cammarota, M. R. (2000), La tradizione retorica in tre declamazioni di Plutarco : De Alexandri Magni fortuna aut virtute, De fortuna Romanorum, De gloria Atheniensium, in : L. Van der Stockt (éd.), Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch, Leuven–Namur : 69–86.
Cuvigny, M., Lachenaud, G. (éds.) (1981), Plutarque, OEuvres morales. Tome XII, 1ère partie : Traités 54–57, Paris.
De Romilly, J. (1979), La douceur dans la pensée grecque, Paris.
Dognini, C. (2007), Il De Herodoti malignitate e la fortuna di Erodoto, in : Y. Perrin (éd.), Neronia VII.
Rome, l’Italie et la Grèce. Hellénisme et philhellénisme au premier siècle après J.–C., (Actes du VIIe Colloque international de la SIEN, Athènes, 21–23 octobre 2004), Bruxelles : 481–502.
Duff, T. E. (2008), The opening of Plutarch’s Life of Themistokles, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 48 : 159–179.
Frost, F. J. (1980), Plutarch’s Themistocles : A Historical Commentary, Princeton.
Gazzano, F., Traina, G. (2014), Plutarque, Historien militaire?, Ktèma 39 : 347–370.
Gazzano, F., Traina, G. (2020), Plutarque, lecteur critique. Jalons d’une recherche sur l’historiographie fragmentaire grecque et latine, in : E. Amato et al. (éds.), Les historiens fragmentaires de langue grecque à l’époque romaine impériale et tardive, Rennes : 323–342.
Gomme, A. W. (1945), A Historical Commentary on Thucydides, I, Oxford.
Hartog, F. (1980), Le miroir d’Hérodote. Essai sur la représentation de l’autre, Paris.
Holzapfel, L. (1884), Ueber die echtheit der plutarchischen schrift de Herodoti malignitate, Philologus 42 : 23–53.
Hornblower, S. (2006), Herodotus’Influence in Antiquity, in : C. Dewald, J. Marincola (éds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus, Cambridge : 306–318.
Inglese, L. (2003), Aspetti della fortuna di Erodoto in Plutarco, Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale 45 : 221–244.
Lenfant, D. (éd.) (2011), Les Perses vus par les Grecs, Paris.
Levi, M. A. (1955), Plutarco e il V secolo, Varese–Milano.
Marincola, J. (1994), Plutarch’s Refutation of Herodotus, The Ancient World 25 : 191–203.
Marincola, J. (2007), The Persian Wars in the Fourth Century Oratory and Historiography, in : E. Bridges, E. Hall, P. J. Rhodes (éds.), Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars, Oxford : 105–126.
Marincola, J. (2012), The Fairest Victor : Plutarch, Aristides and the Persian Wars, Histos 6.20 : 91–113.
Marr, J. L. (1998), Plutarch, Life of Themistocles, Warminster.
Martin, H. (1961), The Character of Plutarch’s Themistocles, TAPA 92 : 326–339.
Mayer, K. (1997), Themistocle, Plutarch and the Voice of the Other, in : C. Schrader, V. Ramón, J. Vela (éds.), Plutarco y la historia. Actas del V simposio español sobre Plutarco (Zaragoza, 20–22 de junio de 1996), Zaragoza : 297–304.
Mele, A. (1955), La battaglia di Platea, Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università di Napoli 5 : 5–41.
Moles, J. (2002), Herodotus and Athens, in : E. J. Bakker et al. (éds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, Leiden–Boston–Köln : 33–52.
Momigliano, A. (1958), The Place of Herodotus in the History of Historiography, History 43 : 1–13.
Muccioli, F. M. (2007), Le radici di un’ostilità: l’amore di Temistocle e di Aristide per Stesileo di Ceo (Plut., Them. 3.2; Arist. 2.3–4), in : J. M. Nieto Ibáñez, R. López López (éds.), El amor en Plutarco, León : 309–318.
Muccioli, F. M. (2012), La storia attraverso gli esempi, Milano–Udine.
Muccioli, F. M., Ghilli, L. (éds.) (2013), Plutarco, Vite Parallele, Temistocle—Camillo, Milano.
Parmeggiani, G. (2011), Eforo di Cuma : studi di storiografia greca, Bologna.
Payen, P. (1997), Les îles nomades. Conquérir et résister dans l’Enquête d’Hérodote, Paris.
Pelling, C. B. R. (2007), De Malignitate Plutarchi. Plutarch, Herodotus and the Persian Wars, in : E. Bridges, E. Hall, P. J. Rhodes (éds.), Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars, Oxford : 145–164.
Pérez Jiménez, A. (2008), El trofeo de Maratón : Adaptación y desarrollo de un tópico ético en Plutarco, in : A. G. Nikolaidis (éd.), The Unity on Plutarch’s Work, Berlin–New York : 591–600.
Piccirilli, L. (1987), Temistocle, Aristide, Cimone, Tucidide di Milesia, Genova.
Pisaniello, C. (2013), Aristide di Lisimaco, il “più desiderabile” degli Ateniesi. La problematica costruzione di un ethos, tesi, Universitàdegli Studi di Napoli Federico II.
Ramón Palerm, V. (2000), El De Herodoti malignitate de Plutarco como epideixis retórica, in : L. Van der Stockt (éd.), Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch, Leuven : 387–398.
Ramón Palerm, V. (2003), La tradizione erodotea nella Vita di Aristide di Plutarco, Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale 45.2 : 245–254.
Rhodes, P. J. (1981), A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia, Oxford. 
Scardigli, B. (éd.) (2011), Plutarco, Aristide e Catone, Milano.
Ziegler, K. (1965), Plutarco, Brescia, 1965 = (1949), Plutarchos von Chaironeia, Stuttgart.

Information

Information: ELECTRUM, 2022, Volume 29, pp. 147 - 160

Article type: Original article

Titles:

French: Frienemies de l’Antiquité: Aristide et Thémistocle vus par Plutarque

Authors

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7236-7501

Lucia Visonà
Laboratoire ORIENT & MÉDITERRANÉE, Paris
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7236-7501 Orcid
All publications →

Laboratoire ORIENT & MÉDITERRANÉE, Paris

Published at: 21.10.2022

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND  licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Lucia Visonà (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

French

Suggested citations: Harvard

Visonà, L., 2022. Frienemies de l’Antiquité: Aristide et Thémistocle vus par Plutarque. ELECTRUM, Volume 29 (2022), pp. 147-160