Trends in regional inequalities between 1910 and 1930 in Hungary and the successor states
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTETrends in regional inequalities between 1910 and 1930 in Hungary and the successor states
Data publikacji: 2020
Wschodnioznawstwo, 2020, Tom 14, s. 95 - 115
https://doi.org/10.4467/20827695WSC.20.006.13334Autorzy
Trends in regional inequalities between 1910 and 1930 in Hungary and the successor states
Trends in regional inequalities between 1910 and 1930 in Hungary and the successor states
The present article is a summary of a 5-year research on historical peripheries of Hungary between 1910 and 2010. The identification of peripheral zones in Hungary in 1910 – which geographers failed to do up to now – contributed to the assessment of mistargeted regional development planning policies in the last hundred years. On the other hand it also caused debates, because many of the backward areas coincided with regions dominated by ethnic minorities, thus strengthening the opinion of the historians of the successor states that Austria-Hungary oppressed national minorities.
The first part of the article summarizes the opinions, interpretations, misunderstandings emerging from this debate around mapping of inequalities and the implementation of geographical methods in historical research. The second part of the article goes further and – by drawing up the regional differences in 2010 – evaluates the development policies of the successor states, claiming that these were not better, than in historical Hungary; the successor states were driven by the same convictions and pursued similar policies toward zones inhabited by minorities as Hungary did. We show that there were remarkable shifts in the extension of backward zones and the question naturally arises when this process began. Using the census data of the 1930s we try to analyze whether some of these changes observable by 2010 can be traced back to WWII (or were generated only later), and if yes, whether these are direct consequences of the new borders drawn in 1920 or, contrary, it was the former processes during the Hungarian rule that culminated (implying that the first 10 years of the successor states was a failure regarding the integration attempts of the new territories). For this a distric level complex development level map of the region was created by combining 10 variables and the patterns in the 1930s were compared to those in 1910 and in 2010.
Ablonczy, B., Ismeretlen Trianon – Az osszeomlas es a bekeszerződes tortenetei 1918–1921, Budapest 2020.
Balaton, P., The Szekely Action (1902–1914). The Example of Regional Economic Development in Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, „Ungarn Jahrbuch, Zeitschrift für Interdisziplinäre Hungarologie” 2016, no. 33, p. 223-236.
Balaton, R., Regionalis gazdasagfejlesztes –a felvideki akcio. A Foldművelesugyi Miniszterium zsolnai kirendeltsege (1908–1919), [in:] Videktortenet II. Eletvilagok es tarsadalmi gyakorlatok a 18–20. szazadban, eds. G. K. Horváth, G. Csikós, I. Hegedűs, J. Ö. Kovács, Budapest 2017, p. 157-187.
Bán, G., Magyarorszag fejlettsegi vizsgalata a 20. szazad elsőfeleben, „Új Nézőpont” 2020, no. 4 (in press).
Braun, L., A hegyvideki akcio tortenete 1897–1910 kozott, Debrecen 2017 (unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Debrecen).
Demeter, G., Torteneti kerdesek foldrajzi szemszogből: mi az, amit maskepp lat egy foldrajzos? A Trianonhoz vezetőut regionalis aspektusai, „Történeti Földrajzi Közlemények” 2017, no. 3-4, p. 22-36.
Demeter, G., Radics, Zs., A gazdasagi fejlettseg regionalis kulonbsegeinek vizsgalata az Osztrak–Magyar Monarchia utodallamaiban jarasszintűadatok alapjan, „Történeti Földrajzi Közlemények” 2015, no. 2, p. 233-246.
Demeter, G., Az 1938–1941 kozott visszatert teruletek fejlettsege es szerepe az anyaorszag es az utodallamok gazdasagaban a kulonfele torteneti narrativak tukreben, „Pro Minoritate” 2019, no. 3, p. 35-69.
Demeter, G., Estimating regional inequalities in the Carpathian Basin –Historical origins and recent outcomes (1880–2010), „Regional Statistics” 2020, no. 1, p. 23-59.
Gellner, E., Nations and Nationalism, Ithaca 1983.
Gulyás, L., Trianon hatasa a Karpat-medence regioinak fejlődesere, „Közép-Európai Közlemények” 2010, no. 4, p. 140-147.
Gyáni, G., Torteneszdiskurzusok, Budapest 2002.
Győri R., Mikle, Gy., A fejlettseg teruleti kulonbsegeinek valtozasa Magyarorszagon, 1910–2011, „Tér és társadalom” 2017, no. 3, p. 144-164.
Hirschman, A., The strategy of economic development, New Haven 1958.
Ivanov M., Kopsidis, M., Was Gerschenkron Right? Bulgarian Agricultural Growth during the Interwar Period in the Light of Modern Development Economics, „Südost-Forschungen” 2015, no. 1.
Jakobi, Á., A terbeli elhelyezkedes differencialo szerepe a 20. szazad eleji Magyarorszagon, [in:] Teruleti egyenlőtlensegek nyomaban… 2018, p. 117-145.
Kincses, Á., Tóth, G., Magyarorszag terszerkezetenek valtozasai 1870-től napjainkig, „Statisztikai Szemle” 2020, no. 6, p. 522-546.
Myrdal, G., Economic theory and underdeveloped regions, New York 1963.
Pénzes, J., The impact of the Trianon Peace Treaty on the border zones –an attempt to analyse the historic territorial development pattern and its changes in Hungary, „Regional Statistics” 2020, no. 1, p. 60-81.
Rónai, A., Kozep-Europa Atlasz, Balatonfüred 1945.
Szilágyi, Zs., Az eletminőseg teruleti kulonbsegeinek valtozasa Magyarorszagon a 20. szazad elsőharmadaban, [in:] Teruleti egyenlőtlensegek nyomaban a torteneti Magyarorszagon: Modszerek es megkozelitesek, eds. G. Demeter, J. Szulovszky, Budapest–Debrecen 2018, p. 255-334.
Szilágyi, Zs., A Kárpát-medence fejlettségi membránja (1910). A fogalomalkotas es a vizualizalas egy lehetseges modszertani megoldasa, az eredmenyek kontextualizalasi kiserlete, [in:] Teruleti egyenlőtlensegek nyomaban… 2018, p. 47-85.
Tobler, W. R., A Computer Model Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region, „Economic Geography” 1970, p. 234-240.
Tomka, B., A Trianon-traumatol a sikeres alkalmazkodasig. Uj hangsulyok az 1920-as evek magyar gazdasaganak vizsgalataban, „Kommentár” 2013, no. 5, http://kommentar.info.hu/iras/2013_5/a_trianon-traumatol_a_sikeres_alkalmazkodasig.
Tomka, B., Gazdasagi novekedes, fogyasztas es eletminőseg. Magyarorszag nemzetkozi osszehasonlitasban az elsővilaghaborutol napjainkig, Budapest 2011.
Tomka, B., Gazdasagi rekonstrukcio Magyarorszagon az elsővilaghaboru utan: regi es uj szempontok, [in:] Grof Bethlen Istvan es kora, Budapest 2014, p. 75-95.
Tomka, B., The economic consequences of World War I and the Treaty of Trianon for Hungary, „Regional Statistics” 2020, no. 1, p. 82-101.
Williamson, J. G., Regional inequality and the process of national development: a description of the patterns, „Economic Development and Cultural Change” 1965, no. 1, p. 3-84.
Informacje: Wschodnioznawstwo, 2020, Tom 14, s. 95 - 115
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Trends in regional inequalities between 1910 and 1930 in Hungary and the successor states
Trends in regional inequalities between 1910 and 1930 in Hungary and the successor states
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Széchenyi István sqr. 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary
Publikacja: 2020
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 384
Liczba pobrań: 318