Against the Psych Causative Alternation in Polish

Bożena  Rozwadowska; Anna Bondaruk

Against the Psych Causative Alternation in Polish

Data publikacji: 21.03.2019

Studies in Polish Linguistics, Special Volume, Special Volume 1 (2019), s. 77 - 97

https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.19.007.10987

Autorzy

Pobierz pełny tekst

PDF

drukuj

Tytuły

Against the Psych Causative Alternation in Polish

Abstrakt

The paper examines Object Experiencer (henceforth, OE)/Subject Experiencer (henceforth, SE) verb alternations in Polish in order to check whether Polish exhibits the causative/ anticausative alternation in the psych domain (psych causative alternation of Alexiadou and Iordăchioaia 2014, henceforth A&I 2014). The focus is on two types of SE reflexive alternants of OE verbs, i.e., (i) SE forms with an obligatory instrumental case-marked DP derived from stative OE roots, and (ii) SE forms with an optional instrumental DP derived from eventive OE roots. It is argued that in both cases the reflexive SE alternants of either stative or eventive OE verbs have an obligatory or optional instrumental DP which acts as a complement and represents a Target/Subject Matter (henceforth, T/SM, cf. Pesetsky 1995), not a Cause. Therefore, the reflexive OE/SE verb alternation cannot be of the causative/anticausative type. Monovalent reflexive SE verbs, lacking an instrumental DP altogether, are unergative (Reinhart 2001), not unaccusative (contra A&I 2014). The overall conclusion reached in the paper is that the psych causative alternation is absent in Polish.

Słowa kluczowe

Subject Experiencer verbs, Object Experiencer verbs, psych causative alternation, unergative verbs, unaccusative verbs, the Polish language

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to two anonymous SPL reviewers, whose insightful comments significantly contributed to the final shape of the paper. All errors remain our responsibility

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię

Alexiadou Artemis (2016). English psych verbs and the causative alternation: A case study in the history of English. Questions and Answers in Linguistics 3(2), 1–14.

Alexiadou Artemis, Iordăchioaia Gianina (2014). The psych causative alternation. Lingua 148, 53–79.

Alexiadou Artemis, Anagnostopoulou Elena, Schäfer Florian (2006). The properties of anticausatives crossslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–211. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Arad Maya (1998a). Psych-notes. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 203–223.

Arad Maya (1998b). VP-Structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics.

Arad Maya (1999). On “little v”. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (Papers on Morphology and Syntax, Cycle One) 33, 1–25.

Belletti Adriana, Rizzi Luigi (1988). Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352.

Biały Adam (2005). Polish Psychological Verbs at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Bondaruk Anna (in press). Argument and case linking of Polish Experiencers. Canadian Journal of Linguistics.

Cançado Márcia (2015). The syntactic-semantic behaviour of psych verbs in Brazilian Portuguese. Paper presented at 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. UNICAMP.

Cetnarowska Bożena (2000). The unergative/unaccusative distinction in Polish. In Proceedings of GLiP-1, Piotr Bański and Adam Przepiórkowski (eds.), 35–46. Warszawa: IPIPAN.

Cetnarowska Bożena (2002). Unaccusativity mismatches and unaccusativity diagnostics from Derivational Morphology. In Many Morphologies, Paul Boucher and Marc Plénat (eds.), 48–81. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Cuervo María Cristina (2015). Causation without a CAUSE. Syntax 18(4), 388–424.

Doron Edit (2017). The causative component of locative and psychological verbs. Paper presented at Linguistic Perspectives on Causation, June 28–30, 2017. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Engelberg Stefan (2018). The argument structure of psych-verbs: A quantitative corpus study on cognitive entrenchment. In Constructional Approaches to Argument Structure in German, Hans Boas and Alexander Ziem (eds.), 47–84. Boston and Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Franco Jon (1990). Towards a typology of psych verbs: Evidence from Spanish. In MITWPL12: Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of SCIL, Thomas Green and Sigal Uziel (eds.), 46–62. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

García-Pardo Alfredo (2018). The morphosyntax of states. Deriving aspect and event roles from argument structure. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. PhD dissertation.

Grimshaw Jane (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Haspelmath Martin (1993). More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity, Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky (eds.), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hoekstra Teun (1984). Transitivity. Dordrecht: Foris.

Iwata Seizi (1995). The distinctive character of psych-verbs as causatives. Linguistic Analysis 1–2, 95–120.

Jurth Réka (2017). On alternating experiencer verbs in Hungarian. In Constraints on Structure and Derivation in Syntax, Phonology and Morphology, Anna Bloch-Rozmej and Anna Bondaruk (eds.), 131–157. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Landau Idan (2010). The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Levin Beth (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Levin Beth, Rappaport Hovav Malka (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Maienborn Claudia (2019) Events and states. In The Oxford Handbook of Event Structure, Robert Truswell (ed.), 50–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Malicka-Kleparska Anna (2017). Middles in English and Polish. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Pesetsky David (1982). Paths and categories. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. PhD dissertation.

Pesetsky David (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Petersen Maria Carolina de Oliveira Almeida (2016). On Experiencers and minimality. College Park, MD: University of Maryland. PhD dissertation.

Preminger Omer (2008). Argument externality. [URL: http://ling.auf.net/ling-buzz/000569, accessed March 15, 2018].

Przepiórkowski Adam (1999). Case assignment and the complement-adjunct dichotomy: A non-configurational constraint-based approach. Universität Tübingen, Tübingen. PhD dissertation.

Przepiórkowski Adam (2017). On the argument-adjunct distinction in the Polish Semantic Syntax tradition. Cognitive Studies 17: 1–10. DOI: 10.11649/cs.1344.

Rákosi György (2006). Dative Experiencer Predicates in Hungarian. Utrecht: LOT Publications.

Rákosi György (2009). Ablative causes in Hungarian. In Approaches to Hungarian: Vol. 11: Papers from the 2007 New York Conference, Marcel den Dikken and Robert M. Vago (eds.), 167–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Reinhart Tanya (1996) Syntactic effects of lexical operations: Reflexives and anticausatives. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. University of Utrecht.