Cultural Conceptualizations of shame & dishonor in Early Poetic Arabic (EPA)

Bartosz  Pietrzak

Cultural Conceptualizations of shame & dishonor in Early Poetic Arabic (EPA)

Data publikacji: 18.11.2021

The Polish Journal of the Arts and Culture. New Series, 2021, 14 (2/2021), s. 73 - 94

https://doi.org/10.4467/24506249PJ.21.018.15324

Autorzy

Pobierz pełny tekst

PDF

drukuj

Tytuły

Cultural Conceptualizations of shame & dishonor in Early Poetic Arabic (EPA)

Abstrakt

Persisting in a binary relationship with honor, shame was an important element of the pre-Islamic Arabic social evaluation system. In my study, I analyzed the two most important EPA concepts parallel to English shame – ˁayb and ˁār – applying the Cultural Linguistic approach. Based on the analyses on corpus of Early Arabic poetry and Classical Arabic dictionaries, I represented cultural schemata encoding the knowledge shared by pre-Islamic Arabs about those phenomena. The paper presents also metaphoric, metonymic, and image-schematic models, which account for the specifics of associated linguistic frames. Moreover, I posit a hypothesis on the existence of a schema subsuming the honor- and shame-dishonor-related schemata in form of social evaluation of usefulness, which seems to correspond to the historical and linguistic data.

Słowa kluczowe

Cultural linguistics, shame, dishonor, Early Poetic Arabic, pre-Islamic Arabic Culture

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię

Abou-Loghod, Lila. 2016.Veiled Sentiments. Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Oakland: University of California Press.

Abou-Zeid, Ahmad. 1966. “Honour and Shame among the Bedouins of Egypt.” In Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society, edited by John G.Peristiany, 245‒259. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Ali, Jawwad. 1993. Al-Mufassal fi Ta’rikh al-Arab qabl al-Islam, vol. IV. Bagdad.

Al-Jallad, Nader. 2010a. “The Concept of “Shame” in Arabic: Bilingual Dictionaries and the Challenge of Defining Culture-Based Emotions.”Language Design, 12: 13‒57.

Al-Jallad, Nader. 2010b. “The Semantic Concept of ‘shame’ in the Holy Qur’an.” In Sacred Text. Explorations in Lexicography, edited by Juan PedroMonferrer-Sala and Angel Urban, 81‒106. Berlin: Peter Lang Verlag.

Alrabiah, Maha S. 2014. King Saud University Classical Arabic Corpus. Ar-Riyāḍ.

Alsheddi, Abeer. 2016. Edit Distance Adapted to Natural Language Words. M.A. Thesis: Ar-Riyāḍ.

Baroja, Julio C. 1966. “Honour and Shame: A Historical Account of Several Conflicts.” In Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society, edited by John G. Peristiany, 81‒121. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Cambell, J.K. 1965. “Honour and the Devil.” In Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society, edited by Peristiany, J. G., 139‒170. Chicago: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Casson, Ronald W. 1983. “Schemata in Cognitive Anthropology.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 12: 429‒462.

Dodd, Peter C. 1973. “Honor and the Forces of Change in Arab Society.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 4 (1): 40‒54.

Farès, Bichr. 1938. “ˁIrḍ”. In The Encyclopedia of Islam. Supplement, 96‒97. Leyeden–London.

Fried, Mirjam and Kiki Nikiforidou. 2013. Advances in Frame Semantics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Guth, Stephan. 2016. “The Etymology of Generosity-Related Terms A Presentation of the EtymArab© Project – Part II”. Folia Orientalia, 53: 59‒104.

Knauf, Ernest A. 2010. “Arabo-Aramaic and ˁArabiyya: From Ancient Arabic to Early Standard Arabic, 200 CE‒600 CE”. InThe Qurˀān in Context ‒Historical and Literary Investigations, edited by Angelika Neuwirth, Michael Marx and Nicolai Sinai. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

Kollareth, Dolichan, Fernandez-Dols, Jose-Miguel, and James A. Russell. 2018. “Shame as a Culture-Specific Emotion Concept.”Journal of Cognition and Culture, 18 (3‒4): 274–292.

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2017. “Context in Cultural Linguistics: The Case of Metaphor.” In Advances in Cultural Linguistics, edited by Farzad Sharifian, 307‒323. Singapore: Springer.

Lane, Edward. 1968a. An Arabic-English Lexicon, vol. IV. Beirut: Libraire Du Liban.

Lane, Edward. 1968b. An Arabic-English Lexicon, vol. V. Beirut: Libraire Du Liban.

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. 2007. “Polysemy, Prototypes, and Radial Categories.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 139‒169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oakley, Todd. 2007. “Image Schemas.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraertsand Hubert Cuyckens, 214‒235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Palmer, Gary B. 2007. “Cognitive Linguistics and Anthropological Linguistics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 1045‒1073. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Linda I. Thornburg. 2007. “Metonymy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraertsand Hubert Cuyckens, 236‒258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Peristiany, John G. (ed.) 1966. Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Sharifian, Farzad. 2003. “On Cultural Conceptualisations.” Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3 (3): 187‒207.

Sharifian, Farzad. 2015. “Cultural Linguistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture, Routledge, edited by Farzad Sharifian, 473‒492. London and New York: Routledge.

Sharifian, Farzad (ed.). 2017. Advances in Cultural Linguistics. Singapore: Springer Nature.

Steward, Frank H. 1994. Honor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Turner, Mark. 2007. “Conceptual Integration.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraertsand Hubert Cuyckens, 377‒397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wehr, Hans. 1976. A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic. New York: Spoken Language Service, Inc.

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Wikan, Unni. 1984. „Shame and Honour: A Contestable Pair.” Man, 19: 635‒52.

Informacje

Informacje: The Polish Journal of the Arts and Culture. New Series, 2021, 14 (2/2021), s. 73 - 94

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/24506249PJ.21.018.15324

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Angielski:

Cultural Conceptualizations of shame & dishonor in Early Poetic Arabic (EPA)

Polski:

Cultural Conceptualizations of shame & dishonor in Early Poetic Arabic (EPA)

Autorzy

Bartosz Pietrzak

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4588-3380

Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków

Publikacja: 18.11.2021

Status artykułu: Otwarte

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND

Udział procentowy autorów:

Bartosz Pietrzak (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 718

Liczba pobrań: 793

<div id="cke_pastebin"> Cultural Conceptualizations of shame & dishonor in Early Poetic Arabic (EPA)</div>

Pobierz xml