Institutional Surrounding of Innovative Activity – Based on Opinions of Women and Men Engaged in the Process of Innovation
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEInstitutional Surrounding of Innovative Activity – Based on Opinions of Women and Men Engaged in the Process of Innovation
Data publikacji: 03.11.2017
International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2017, Numer 16(1), s. 11 - 33
https://doi.org/10.4467/24498939IJCM.17.001.7045Autorzy
Institutional Surrounding of Innovative Activity – Based on Opinions of Women and Men Engaged in the Process of Innovation
Abels, G. (2012). Research by, for and about Women: Gendering Science and Research Policy. In: G. Abels & J.M. Mushaben (eds.), Gendering European Union. New Approaches to Old Democratic Deficits (pp. 187–207). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alsos, G.A., Ljunggren, E. & Hytti, U. (2013). Gender and innovation: state of the art and a research agenda. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 236–256.
Amable, B. (2000). Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 645–687.
Beede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B. & Doms, M. (2011). Women in STEM. A Gender Gap to Innovation. U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of the Chief Economist, Washington. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/womeninstemagaptoinnovation8311.pdf (access: 12.03.2016).
Bunker Whittington, K. & Smith-Doerr, L. (2005). Gender and commercial science – Women’s patenting in the life sciences. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(4), 355–370.
Carrasco, I. (2014). Gender gap in innovation: an institutionalist explanation. Management Decision, 52(2), 410–424.
Chavance, B. (2009). Institutional Economics. London & New York: Routledge.
Degraff, J. & Quinn, E. (2007). Leading Innovation. New York: McGraw – Hill.
Deza, M. & Deza E. (2009). Encyclopedia of Distance. Berlin: Sprnger-Verlag.
Dudel, B., Kowalczuk-Walędziak, M., Łogwiniuk, K.M., Szorc, K. & Wróblewska, U. (2014). Innowacje w teorii i praktyce edukacyjnej. Białystok: Fundacja Centrum Transferu Wiedzy i Innowacji Społeczno-Pedagogicznych. [Online] Retrieved from: http://pedagogika.uwb.edu.pl/files/file/PDF/PUBLIKACJE/Innowacje.pdf http://www://pedagogika.uwb.edu.pl/files/file/PDF/PUBLIKACJE/Innowacje.pdf (access: 23.03.2016).
Eriksson, A.F. (2014). A gender perspective as trigger and facilitator of innovation. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 163–180.
Everitt, B., Landau, S., Leese, M. & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster Analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Willey & Sons.
Foss, L., Woll, K. & Moilanen, M. (2013). Creativity and implementations of new ideas: do organizational structure, work environment and gender matter? International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 298–322.
Freeman, Ch. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Printer Publisher.
Frietsch, R., Haller, I., Vrohlings, M. & Grupp, H. (2008). Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, 16.
Frietsch, R., Haller, I., Funken-Vrohlings, M. & Grupp, H. (2009). Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing. Research Policy, 38, 590–599.
Galindo, M.-A. & Ribeiro D. (eds.) (2012). Women’s Entrepreneurship and Economics. New Perspectives, Practices, and Policies, New York: Springer.
Gonet, D. (2015). Innowacyjność na przykładzie kobiet i mężczyzn prowadzących gospodarstwa rolne z gminy Bojanowo. Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu, 5(17), 59–64.
Grabiński, T. (1984). Wielowymiarowa analiza porównawcza w badaniach dynamiki zjawisk ekonomicznych. Special issue: monographies, no. 61. Kraków: AE.
Grabiński, T., Wydymus, S. & Zeliaś, A. (1989). Metody taksonomii numerycznej w modelowaniu zjawisk społeczno-gospodarczych. Warszawa: PWN.
Hunt, J., Garant, J.-P., Herman, H. & Munroe, D.J. (2013). Why are women underrepresented amongst patentees? Research Policy, 42, 831–843.
Jacobsen, J.P. (2003). Some Implications of the Feminist Project in Economics for Empirical Methodology. In: D.K. Barker & E. Kuiper(eds.), Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Economics (pp. 89–103). London: Routledge.
Jaworek, M., Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, A. (2015). Gender as a category of analysis in the social sciences. In: E. Okoń-Hoodyńska & A. Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz (eds.), Statistical profiles of women’s and men’s status in the economy, science and society. Kraków: WUJ.
Jönsson, P. & Carlsson, I. (2000). Androgyny and creativity: a study of the relationships between a balanced sex-role and creative function. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 269–274.
Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P. (2005). Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. West Sussex: John Willey & Sons.
Larivière, V., Ni, Ch., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B. & Sugimoto C.R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504, 211–213.
Malhotra, A., Schulte, J., Patel, P. & Petesch, P. (2009). Innovation for Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality. Washington D.C.: The international Center for Research on Women (ICRW).
North, D. (1994). Institutions matter, mimeo. Washington University.
Okoń-Horodyńska, E. (2015). From Innovation to Innovative Gender. In: E. Okoń-Hoodyńska & A. Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz (eds.), Statistical profiles of women’s and men’s status in the economy, science and society (pp. 231–254). Kraków: WUJ.
Okoń-Hoodyńska, E. & Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, A. (eds.) (2015). Statistical Profiles of Women’s and Men’s Status in the Economy, Science and Society. Kraków: WUJ.
Okoń-Horodyńska, E., Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, A., Sierotowicz, T. & Wisła, R. (2015). Gender in the creation of intellectual property of the selected European Union countries. Economics and Sociology, 8(2), 11–25.
Okoń-Horodyńska, E. (2015). Regional Innovation Strategy as One of the Fields for Research in Innovative Gender (InnoGend). OPTIMUM. Studia Ekonomiczne, 5(77), 93–109.
Østergaard, C.R., Timmermans, B. & Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500–510.
Panek, T., Zwierzchowski, J. (2013). Statystyczne metody wielowymiarowej analizy porównawczej. Teoria i zastosowania. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
PARP (2007).Rola kobiet w innowacyjnej przedsiębiorczości wysokich technologii. Warszawa: ARC Rynek i Opinia, PARP.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1912). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (2nd ed.). München und Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1926. English edition: The Theory of Economic Development, New York: Oxford University Press, 1934.
Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149.
Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Stanisz, A. (2007). Przystępny kurs statystyki z zastosowaniem STATISTICA PL na przykładach z medycyny. Tom 3: Analizy wielowymiarowe. Kraków: StatSoft Polska.
Storper, M. (2000). Conventions and institutions: rethinking problems of state reform, governance and policy. In: L. Burlamaqui, A.C. Castro & H.-J. Chang (eds.), Institutions and the Role of the State (pp. 73–102). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Whalen, Ch.J. (1996). The institutional approach to political economy. In: F.E. Foldvary (ed.), Beyond Neoclassical Economics; Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory (pp. 83–99). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Womenable (2010). Innovation and Women’s Entrepreneurship. An Exploration of Current Knowledge. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, London.
Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, A. & Sierotowicz, T. (2016). Women, men and creativity in business sector – comparative studies of leading EU and ECE countries. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management (JRBEM), 5(3), February, 609–624.
Informacje: International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2017, Numer 16(1), s. 11 - 33
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Institutional Surrounding of Innovative Activity – Based on Opinions of Women and Men Engaged in the Process of Innovation
Institutional Surrounding of Innovative Activity – Based on Opinions of Women and Men Engaged in the Process of Innovation
Jagiellonian University in Kraków
Jagiellonian University in Kraków
Jagiellonian University in Kraków
Jagiellonian University in Kraków
Publikacja: 03.11.2017
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1023
Liczba pobrań: 987