Kristin Hausler
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2017 (3), 2017, s. 357 - 358
Kristin Hausler
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2015 (1), 2015, s. 117 - 146
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.15.016.4514This article considers whether there are any gaps within the legal framework protecting cultural heritage from attacks conducted by non-state armed groups. It first looks at the existing obligations of states vis-à-vis non-state armed groups with regard to the protection of such heritage, in particular their obligations stemming from the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. It also examines the obligations of non-state armed groups with regard to cultural heritage, clarifying their obligations under international humanitarian law, including customary international norms, and other sources of international law. Finally, this article discusses accountability mechanisms, in particular with the application of international criminal law to prosecute the members of non-state armed groups who have conducted attacks against cultural property.
Kristin Hausler
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2021 (7), 2021, s. 193 - 202
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.21.025.15270This Note considers the Conclusions on EU Approach to Cultural Heritage in Conflicts and Crises, which were adopted by the Council of the European Union on 21 June 2021. It starts by analysing the shift in the way cultural heritage has been perceived since the introduction of cultural heritage within the EU’s external relations’ strategy. It then considers how the role of cultural heritage as a vector of peace and development could be strengthened and consolidated through a better articulation of its linkages with climate change.