FAQ
Jagiellonian University logo

Teories of political philosophy as guiding principles in social securit

Publication date: 06.09.2018

Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy, Volume 25 (2018), Volume 25 Issue 3, pp. 271 - 291

https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.18.017.8827

Authors

Luka Mišič
University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
All publications →

Titles

Teories of political philosophy as guiding principles in social securit

Abstract

In the contribution, I explore some of the value-based foundations of social security, i.e. foundations of social security and social assistance schemes, deriving them from three selected theories of political philosophy: liberalism, libertarianism and communitarianism. The three theories are briefly accompanied by the theory of utilitarianism, in the contribution limited to the notion economic efficiency. Relying on the theories’ hallmarks, I address the notions of social solidarity, property and freedom (of conduct) as three commonly conflicting elements linked to the legal framework of every social protection scheme. By doing so, I try to show how arguments stemming from political philosophy can be used in order to morally affirm, legitimize or invalidate particular institutions or regulatory elements regarding social security. If used by courts or the legislator,  they can offer guidance in bringing about changes to the (use or development of) social security legislation. Different arguments can be used in order to achieve different, even diverging goals, e.g. broadening or limiting personal or material scope of coverage, increasing or decreasing the level of benefits, enhancing or diminishing the role of private insurance.
The discussion is based upon a generalized or textbook model of Bismarckian social insurance and tax-funded social assistance schemes with universal, tax-funded social security schemes added to the debate only briefly. Several generalizations also apply to the depiction of key features of the selected theories, since their in-depth analysis would by far transgress the scope of this contribution. 

References

Bader R.M., Robert Nozick, Major Conservative and Libertarian Thinkers, Series Editor: Meadowcroft J., New York 2010.

Bauböck R., Citizenship and collective identities as political sources of solidarity in the European Union, in: K. Banting, W. Kymlicka (eds.), The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, Oxford 2017.

Becker U., Solidarity, financing and personal coverage, The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy 2007, 6, 1.

Bloom A., Justice: John Rawls vs. the tradition of political philosophy, The American Political Science Review 1975, 69, 2.

Daniels N., Individual and social responsibility for health, in: C. Knight, Z. Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice, Oxford 2011.

Deigh J., Liberalism and freedom, in: J.P. Sterba (ed.), Social and Political Philosophy: Contemporary Perspectives, London and New York 2001.

Dworkin R., What is equality? Part 2:Equality of resources, Philosophy & Public Affairs 1981, 10, 4.

Eichenhofer E., Social security and philosophy, Študije FDV 2006, 3, 3.

Esping-Andersen G., Towards a good society, once again?, in: G. Esping-Andersen (ed.), Why we Need a New Welfare State, Oxford 2002.

Etzioni A., Citizenship in a communitarian perspective, Ethnicities 2011, 11, 3.

Ferrera M., The Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection, Oxford 2005.

Fleishacker S., A Short History of Distributive Justice, Cambridge, Mass. 2004.

Freeman S., Introduction: John Rawls – An overview, in: S. Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge 2003.

Gómez Heredero A., Social Security as a Human Right: The Protection Afforded by the European Convention on Human Rights, Strasbourgh 2007.

Kelly P., Liberalism, Cambridge 2005.

Kymlicka W., Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction, Oxford 2002.

Lacey A.R., Robert Nozick, Chesham 2001.

Le Grand J., Individual choice and social exclusion, in: K. Dowding et al. (eds.), Justice and Democracy, Cambridge 2004.

Lenaerts K., European Union citizenship, national welfare systems and social solidarity, Jurisprudence 2011, 18, 2.

Locke J., Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge 1992.

Machan T.R., Libertarian justice, in: J.P. Sterba (ed.), Social and Political Philosophy: Contemporary Perspectives, London and New York 2001.

Maffetone S., Rawls: An Introduction, Cambridge 2010.

Marshall T.H., Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge 1950.

Miller D., Principles of Social Justice, Cambridge, Mass. 2003.

Mullard M., Discourses on citizenship: The challenge to contemporary citizenship, in: J. Bussemaker, Citizenship and Welfare State Reform in Europe, London and New York 1999.

Murphy L., Nagel T., The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice, Oxford 2002.

Mišič L., Odsevi politične filozofije v pravu socialne varnosti [Reflections of political philosophy in social security law], Delavci in delodajalci 2018, 18, 1.

Mišič L., Meje zdravstvenega zavarovanja so meje mojega sveta: O svobodi ravnanja in izbire življenjskega sloga [Limits of health insurance are the limits of my world: On freedom of conduct and the choice of a lifestyle], Pravna praksa 2017, 36, 30/31.

Nagel T., Equality and Partiality, Oxford 1991.

Nagel T., Rawls and liberalism, in: S. Freeman, The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge 2003.

Nozick R., Anarchy State and Utopia, Oxford 1974.

Overbeek H., Transnational political economy and the politics of European (un)employment: Introducing the themes, in: H. Overbeek (ed.), The Political Economy of European Employment: European Integration and the Transnationalization of the (Un)employment Question, London 2003.

Paden R., Social security, insurance, and justice, Public Affairs Quarterly 1998, 12, 2.

Pieters D., Social Security: An Introduction to the Basic Principles, Alphen aan den Rijn 2006.

Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass. 1971.

Rawls J., Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, Mass. 2001.

Rogers N., Scannell R., Walsh J., Free Movement of Persons in the Enlarged European Union, London 2012.

Rogers N., Scannell R., Free Movement of Persons in the Enlarged European Union, London 2005.

Shapiro D., Is the Welfare State Justified?, Cambridge 2007.

Spiegel B. (ed.) (et al.), The Relationship between Social Security Coordination and Taxation Law, Analytical Report 2014, FreSsco, European Commission, April 2015.

Sterba J.P., in: J. Naverson, J.P. Sterba, Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?, Cambridge 2010.

Strban G., in: B. Kresal, K. Kresal Šoltes, G. Strban, Social Security Law in Slovenia, Alphen aan den Rijn 2016.

Strban G., Terminološke zagate pri vsebinskem razlikovanju izrazov v pravu socialne varnosti [Terminological issues in substantive distinctions between terms in social security law], accepted for publication in: M. Jemec Tomazin, G. Strban, K. Škrubej (eds.), Pravna terminologija: V teoriji, zgodovini in praksi (working title), Pravna obzorja, Ljubljana 2018–2019.

Ter Meulen R., Solidarity, justice and recognition of the other, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2016, 37.

Vandenbroucke F., Vanhercke B., A European Social Union: 10 Tough Nuts to Carck, Friends of Europe, Brussels 2014.

Van Houdt F., Suvarierol S., Schinkel W., Neoliberal communitarian citizenship: Current trends towards ‘earned citizenship’ in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands, International Sociology 2011, 26, 3.

Van Houdt F., Schinkel W., A Genealogy of neoliberal communitarianism, Theoretical Criminology 2013, 17, 4.

Verschueren H., Free movement or benefit tourism: The unreasonable burden of Brey, European Journal of Migration and Law 2014, 16, 2.

Verschueren H., Preventing “benefit tourism” in the EU: A narrow or broad interpretation of the possibilities offered by the ECJ in Dano, Common Market Law Review 2015/1, 52, 2.

Verschueren H., Free movement of EU citizens: Including for the poor?, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2015/2, 22, 1.

Walzer M., Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, New York 1983.

Information

Information: Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy, Volume 25 (2018), Volume 25 Issue 3, pp. 271 - 291

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

Teories of political philosophy as guiding principles in social securit

English:

Teories of political philosophy as guiding principles in social securit

Authors

University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Published at: 06.09.2018

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND  licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Luka Mišič (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English