Pope John Paul II's concept of the indirect employer as exemplified by transnational corporations
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEPope John Paul II's concept of the indirect employer as exemplified by transnational corporations
Publication date: 05.09.2019
Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy, Volume 26 (2019), Volume 26 Issue 4, pp. 291 - 301
https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.19.020.10910Authors
Pope John Paul II's concept of the indirect employer as exemplified by transnational corporations
The term “indirect employer” when used in labour law literature usually refers to the usage of work performed by persons formally employed by a third party. In such a situation, employee seems to have the direct (formal) employer and the indirect one who appropriates the results of the work done without entering into an employment relationship. Pope John Paul II in the encyclical Laborem Exercens uses the notion of the indirect employer in a somewhat different meaning. The Pope refers rather to the sphere of politics and the ability to shape the statutory labour law or the actual working (living) standards for the entire society. The article explains the concept of the indirect employer as it was used in the encyclical and indicates the ideas that are behind it. The article also attempts to show the usefulness of the John Paul II’s concept of the indirect employer in considering issues related to the transnational corporations and labour law.
ASJC: 3308
JEL: K31
Anioł W. (2002) Deficyt demokratyczny w systemie globalnym, “Studia Europejskie”, nr 4.
Arthurs H.W. (2002) Private Ordering and Workers’ Rights in the Global Economy: Corporate Codes of Conduct as a Regime of Labour Market Regulation [in:] J. Conaghan, R.M. Fischl, K. Klare (eds), Labour Law in an Era of Globalization. Transformative Practices and Possibilities, Oxford–New York.
Arthurs H.W. (2006) Who’s Afraid of Globalization? Reflections on the Future of Labour Law [in:] J.D.R. Craig, S. Michael Lynk (eds.), Globalization and the Future of Labour Law, Cambridge.
Backer L.C. (2008) From Moral Obligation to International Law: Disclosure Systems, Markets and the Regulation of Multinational Corporations, “Georgetown Journal of International Law”, vol. 39, issue 4.
Bakan J. (2005) The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, New York.
Benedict XVI (2009) Caritas in veritate, http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate.html (access: 19 August 2019).
Biskup P. (2010) Korporacje transnarodowe a współczesne formy państwa i suwerenności [in:] J. Menkes, T. Gardocka (red.), Korporacje transnarodowe. Jeden temat, różne spojrzenia, Warszawa.
Davidov G. (2015) Indirect Employment: Should Lead Companies be Liable?, “Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal”, vol. 37.
Garcia R.A. (2016) Modern Accountability for a Modern Workplace: Reevaluating the National Labor Relations Board’s Joint Employer Standard, “The George Washington Law Review”, vol. 84.
ILO (2017) Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, 5th Edition, http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/---multi/documents/publication/wcms_094386.pdf (access: 19 August 2019).
Institut de Droit International (1995) Obligations of Multinational Enterprises and their Member Companies, http://www.idi-iil.org/app/uploads/2017/06/1995_lis_04_en.pdf (access: 19 August 2019).
John Paul II (1981) Laborem Exercens, https://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091981_laborem-exercens.html (access: 19 August 2019).
John Paul II (1987) Sollicitudo rei socialis, http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis.html (access: 19 August 2019).
John Paul II (1991) Centessimus annus, https://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_01051991_centesimus-annus.html (access: 19 August 2019).
John Paul II (2005) Pamięć i tożsamość. Rozmowy na przełomie tysiącleci, http://zwola-old.karmelicibosi.pl/p/z/formacja/pamitozs.pdf (access: 19 August 2019).
Johnson M. (2005) Indirect Employer Liability: The Ninth Circuit Limits Liability for Racial Discrimination, “U.C. Davis Law Review”, vol. 38, issue 2.
Karski K. (2010) Zakres podmiotowości korporacji transnarodowej w prawie międzynarodowym [in:] J. Menkes, T. Gardocka (red.), Korporacje transnarodowe. Jeden temat, różne spojrzenia, Warszawa.
Kelley F. (1908) The Responsibility of the Consumer, “The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science”, vol. 32.
Lech M. (2010) Zdolność oddziaływania korporacji transnarodowych na współczesne stosunki międzynarodowe w dobie procesu globalizacji [in:] J. Menkes, T. Gardocka (red.), Korporacje transnarodowe. Jeden temat, różne spojrzenia, Warszawa.
Lower M. (2007) John Paul II and Employee Participation in Corporate Governance, “Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy”, vol. 21.
Marzęda K. (2007) Proces globalizacji korporacyjnej, Bydgoszcz.
McMorran Sulentic A. (2006) Human Dignity First: John Paul II, Systems Analysis and The ERISA Fiduciary, “Journal of Catholic Legal Studies”, vol. 45.
Mielnik B. (2008) Kształtowanie się pozapaństwowej podmiotowości w prawie międzynarodowym, Wrocław.
O’Boyle E.J. (2005) John Paul II’s Vision of the Social Economy, “International Journal of Social Economics”, vol. 32, issue 6.
OECD (2011) OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/48004323.pdf (access: 19 August 2019).
Oniszczuk J. (2010) Prawo pracy a korporacje transnarodowe [in:] J. Menkes, T. Gardocka (red.), Korporacje transnarodowe. Jeden temat, różne spojrzenia, Warszawa.
Oręziak L. (2012) OFE w Polsce – produkt ekspansji globalnych instytucji finansowych, “Polityka Społeczna”, nr 11/12.
Otok S. (2011) Geografia polityczna. Geopolityka – ekopolityka – globalistyka, Warszawa.
Pius XI (1931) Quadragesimo anno, http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_19310515_quadragesimo-anno.html (access: 19 August 2019).
Ravenswood K., Kaine S. (2015) The Role of Government in Influencing Labour Conditions through the Procurement of Services: Some Political Challenges, “Journal of Industrial Relations”, vol. 57, issue 4.
Sanetra W. (1989) Pracownicy i pracodawcy – niektóre podstawowe problemy, pojęcia i konstrukcje [in:] W. Sanetra (red.), Pracownicy i pracodawcy: materiały XVI Zimowej Szkoły Prawa Pracy, Karpacz, marzec 1989, Wrocław.
Scaperlanda A. (1998) John Paul II’s Vision of the Role of Multinational Enterprise Expansion in Building the Social Economy, “International Journal of Social Economics”, vol. 25, issue 11/12.
Wagner B. (1990) W sprawie „pracodawcy pośredniego”, “Państwo i Prawo”, nr 10.
Williams G.H. (1982) John Paul II’s Concepts of Church, State, and Society, “Journal of Church and State”, vol. 24, issue 3.
Wratny J. (1994) Conflict and Co-Operation in the Labour – Management Relations Comparative Legal Approach: Canada-Poland, “Revue generale de droit”, vol. 25.
Zieliński T. (1986) Prawo pracy. Zarys systemu. Część I ogólna, Warszawa.
Zorska A. (2007) Korporacje transnarodowe. Przemiany, oddziaływania, wyzwania, Warszawa.
Information: Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy, Volume 26 (2019), Volume 26 Issue 4, pp. 291 - 301
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Pope John Paul II's concept of the indirect employer as exemplified by transnational corporations
Pope John Paul II's concept of the indirect employer as exemplified by transnational corporations
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
Dewajtis 5, 01-815 Warszawa, Polska, Poland
Published at: 05.09.2019
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 1309
Number of downloads: 2617