Disability and (Dis)empowering Technologies: The Case of Blind Translators
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEDisability and (Dis)empowering Technologies: The Case of Blind Translators
Publication date: 2022
Arts & Cultural Studies Review, 2022, Issue 3 (53) Technology between empowerment and exclusion, pp. 476 - 491
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.22.031.16620Authors
Disability and (Dis)empowering Technologies: The Case of Blind Translators
This paper is based on fifteen in-depth interviews with blind translators and interpreters from Poland. Due to the age-diverse sample of participants, three periods based on available assistive technologies have been isolated: the analogue period, the transitional period and the current, digital period. The paper discusses in detail challenges and opportunities faced by the interviewees working in each of these periods, with particular emphasis on accounts of analogue period and transition into digital technologies provided by three veteran translators.
The data is analysed within the theoretical framework provided by Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of capitals. The results of the study suggest that there is a growing gap between the volumes of embodied and objectivised cultural capital indispensable for sighted and blind translators. The more technologically advanced the world of translators becomes, the more surplus technologies have to be mastered by the blind. And some of the digital tools which have become essential for translators are hardly accessible for the blind.
In conclusion, the author argues that modern technologies, far from eliminating the need for additional volumes of cultural and social capital, have actually aggravated it. Unless digital translation tools and settings are made accessible blind and low sighted translators and interpreters will continue facing exclusion from the labour market. Moreover, looking at the experiences of the older generation of successful translators and interpreters with visual impairment, we can draw conclusions on what factors sup ort the inclusion of younger generations of blind translators and interpreters in the labour market.
* The research reported in this paper was financed by the research grant no. DEC-2013/09/N/HS2/02096 of the Polish National Centre of Science.
Babbie E., The Practice of Social Research, 12th ed., Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont 2010.
Barkhordar Y., Yousefi K., Major Skills and Abilities of Blind and Visually Impaired Translators, “Translation Journal” 2015, http://translationjournal.net/April-2015/major-skillsand-abilities-of-blind-and-visually-impaired-translators.html (accessed: 15.06.2022).
Barnes C., Mercer G. (eds.), Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research, Disability Press, Leeds 2004.
Bourdieu P., The Forms of Capital [in:] J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood, Westport 1986, pp. 241–258.
Bourdieu P., Language and Symbolic Power, Polity Press, Cambridge 1991.
Bourdieu P., The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups, “Theory and Society” 1985, vol. 14 (6), pp. 723–744.
Dold D., Die Notizentechnik blinder DolmetscherInnen beim Konsekutivdolmetschen (unpublished MA Thesis), Faculty of Translation Studies, University of Graz, Graz 2015.
Figiel W., Levelling the Playing Field with (In)accessible Technologies? How Technological Revolution Has Changed the Working Conditions of Blind Translators, “Między Oryginałem a Przekładem” 2018, vol. 24, no. 3 (41), pp. 75–88.
Figiel W., New Technologies in Teaching Interpreting to Students with Visual Impairments [in:] M.D. Rodriguez-Melchor, I. Horvath (eds.), The Role of Technology in Conference Interpreter Training, Peter Lang, Bern 2020, pp. 221–236.
Figiel W., Niewidomi tłumacze, (nie)widzialni aktywiści?, “Teksty Drugie” 2020, no. 2, pp. 40–57.
Kellett Bidoli C.J., The Training of Blind Students at the SSLMIT – Trieste, “The Interpreter’s Newsletter” 2003, no. 12, pp. 189–199.
O’Brien S., Rodriguez-Vázquez S., Translation and Technology [in:] S. Laviosa, M. González-‑Davies (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Education, Routledge, New York 2020, pp. 264–277.
Refaat I., Accessibility in the Computer-Aided Translation Tools for English-Arabic Language Pair, “Transcultural Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences” 2021, vol. 1 (2), pp. 36–52. DOI: 10.21608/tjhss.2021.57339.1028.
Rodriguez-Vázquez S., Fitzpatrick D., O’Brien S., Is Web-Based Computer-Aided Translation (CAT) Software Usable for Blind Translators? [in:] K. Miesenberger, G. Kouroupetroglou (eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2018, Springer, Cham 2019, pp. 31–34.
Rodriguez-Vázquez S., Mileto F., On the Lookout for Accessible Translation Aids: Current Scenario and New Horizons for Blind Translation Students and Professionals, “Journal of Translator Education and Translation Studies (TETS)” 2016, vol. 1 (2), pp. 115–135.
Wengraf T., Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles 2001.
Information: Arts & Cultural Studies Review, 2022, Issue 3 (53) Technology between empowerment and exclusion, pp. 476 - 491
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Disability and (Dis)empowering Technologies: The Case of Blind Translators
Disability and (Dis)empowering Technologies: The Case of Blind Translators
University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland
Published at: 2022
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 568
Number of downloads: 355