FAQ

Uti frui arbitrio boni viri: Standard of Behaviour or Reference to an Arbitrator?

Publication date: 15.06.2012

Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History, Volume 4 (2011), Volume 4, pp. 13 - 19

https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.12.001.0502

Authors

Elena Giannozzi
Panthéon-Assas University – Paris II
All publications →

Titles

Uti frui arbitrio boni viri: Standard of Behaviour or Reference to an Arbitrator?

Abstract

The objective of this contribution is to analyse the meaning of the expression uti frui arbitrio boni viri. This expression is contained in one of the clauses of the cautio fructuaria, which is the warranty given by the usufructuary to the owner. We can find this expression in a dozen passages of the Digest. The entire title 9 of book seven is dedicated to the cautio fructuaria, which was given in the form of a stipulatio praetoria. Uti frui arbitrio boni viri raises a question, that this paper aims to answer: does it refer to an arbitrator or to an abstract standard of behaviour? The expression arbitrium boni viri is not the only one that we fi nd in our sources. In fact there is a concurrent expression, diligens pater familias, which can be found in two passages of the Digest and in two passages of the Pauli Sententiae. I aim to understand why our sources left us two different expressions and if there is a difference between them.

Information

Information: Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History, Volume 4 (2011), Volume 4, pp. 13 - 19

Article type: Original article

Titles:

English: Uti frui arbitrio boni viri: Standard of Behaviour or Reference to an Arbitrator?

Authors

Panthéon-Assas University – Paris II

Published at: 15.06.2012

Article status: Open

Licence: None

Percentage share of authors:

Elena Giannozzi (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English