FAQ

Ułożyć świat na nowo. Rekonstrukcja koncepcji Tima Ingolda (cz. III)

Publication date: 2018

Ethnography. Practices, Theories, Experiences, 2018, Volume 4/2018, pp. 61 - 79

https://doi.org/10.4467/254395379EPT.18.004.11163

Authors

Katarzyna Wala
Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Katedra Etnologii i Antropologii Kulturowej
All publications →

Titles

Ułożyć świat na nowo. Rekonstrukcja koncepcji Tima Ingolda (cz. III)

Abstract

The article is the third part of the triptych published in the subsequent issues of “Ethnography” (2016, 2017), regarding the anthropological concepts and explorations of Tim Ingold. In this part, the author presents a critical analysis of Ingold’s proposals, referring to theories developed within the  contemporary humanities and social sciences by researchers such as Jane Bennett, Rosi Braidotti, Donna Haraway and Bruno Latour. The article also introduces Ingold’s attitude towards ethnography as a scientific discipline, and explores the possibilities of using his proposals in ethnographic fieldwork.

References

Download references

Anderson, B., Harrison, P. (2010). The Promise of Non-Representional Theories. W: B. Anderson, P.Harrison (eds.), Taking-Place. Non Representationl Theories and Geography (s. 1–36). London: Ashgate.

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.

Barreto, R. (2010). Ontology and anthropology of interanimality: Merleau-Ponty from Tim Ingold’s perspective. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana5(1), 32–57.

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Brocki, M. (2008). Antropologia. Literatura – Dialog – Przekład. Wrocław: Katedra Etnologii i Antropologii Kulturowej Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

Clark, E. (2013). “As long as it’s not the Nubians”: An exploration of the impact of human–animal relations on violence. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:OMvwzKKRcOQJ:https://ojs.standrews.ac.uk/index.php/SAEE/article/download/789/672/+&cd=2&hl=pl&ct=clnkgl=pl [dostęp: 05.05.2018].

Czapliński, P., Nycz, R. i in. (red.), 2017. Nowa humanistyka. Zajmowanie pozycji, negocjowanie autonomii. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN.

Deleuze, G., Giattari, F. (2015). Tysiąc Plateu. Przeł. J. Bednarek, Warszawa: Fundacja Bęc Zmiana .

Gieser, T. (2008). Embodiment, emotion and empathy. A phenomenological approach to apprenticeship learning. Anthropological Theory8(3), 299–318.

Hastrup, K. (2005). Anthropological knowledge incorporated. W: K. Hastrup, P. Hervik (eds.), SocialExperience and Anthropological Knowledge (s. 168–180). London-New York: Routledge.

Hastrup, K. (2008). Droga do antropologii. Między doświadczeniem a teorią. Przeł. E. Klekot. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Heron, J. (1996). Cooperative Inquiry. Research into the Human Condition.  Publications, London-Thousand Oaks-New Delhi: SAGE.

Heron, J., Reason, P. (1997). A Participatory Inquiry Paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry3, 274–294.

Hoły-Łuczaj, M. (2015). Posthumanizm. Między matematyką a etyką. Kultura i Wartości1(11), 45–61.

Howes, D. (2003). Sensual Relations. Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Howes, D. (2011). Reply to Tim Ingold. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale19(3), 318–322.

Ingold, T. (1986). Evolution and social life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the environment: esseys on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London – New York: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2005a). Kultura i postrzeganie środowiska. Przeł. G. Pożarlik. W: M. Kempny, E. Nowicka(red.), Badanie kultury. Elementy teorii kultury (s. 73–86). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Ingold, T. (2005b). Epilogue: Towards a Politics of Dwelling. Conservation and Society3(2), 501–508.

Ingold, T. (2007). Lines. A Brief History . London–New York: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2008). Anthropology is Not Ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy154, 69–92.

Ingold, T. (2011a). Being Alieve. Esseys on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London–New York: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2011b). Worlds of sense and sensing the world: a response to Sarah  Pink and David Howes. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale19(3), 313–317.

Ingold, T. (2011c). Reply to David Howes. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale19(3), 323–327.

Ingold, T. (2014). That’s enough about ethnography!. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 383–395.

Ingold, T. (2017). Correspondences. Knowing from the inside. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen.

Ingold, T., Wala, K., Zych, M. (2014). Ruch, którym jesteśmy, zawiera też ruch naszych myśli. Z Timem Ingoldem rozmawiają Katarzyna Wala i Magdalena Zych. Autoportret. Pismo o DobrejPrzestrzeni, 2(45), 10–15.

Ingold, T., Wala, K., Zych, M. (2017). Letters from CracowW: T. Ingold, Correspondences. Knowing from the inside (s. 122–143). Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen.

Kenrick, J. (2011). Unthinking Eurocentism: The political writing of Adam Kuper and Tim Ingold. Anthropological Notebooks17(2), 11–36.

Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural Geography: the busyness of being ‘more-then-representational . Progress in Human Geography32(4), 83–94.

MacDougall, S. (2014). Enough about Ethnography: An Interview with Tim Ingold. https:// culanth.org/fieldsights/841-enough-about-ethnography-an-interview-with-tim-in-gold [dostęp: 10.05.2018].

Moores, S. (2012). Loose Ends: Lines, Media and Social Changehttp://www.media-anthropology.net/file/moores_loose_ends.pdf [dostęp: 23.05.2018].

Mroczkowski, B. (2017). Schizofreniczna materia. O produkcji ciał, pojęć i podmiotowości. Praktyka Teoretyczna3(25), 342–353.

Nagel, S.K. (2015). Thickening Descriptions with Views from Pragmatism and Anthropology. W:Metzinger T., Windt J. M. (eds.), Open MIND (s1–11). Frankfurt: MIND Group.

Overmann, K.A. (2017). Materiality and numerical cognition: A Material Engagement Theoryperspective. W: T. Wynnm, F.L. Coolidge (eds.), Cognitive models in Palaeolithic archeology (s. 89–112). London: Oxford University Press.

Pink, S. (2011). The future of sensory anthropology / the anthropology of the senses. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale18(3), 331–333.

Pink, S. (2012). Situating everyday life, Practices and places. Los Angeles-London-New Delhi: Sage .

Pokropski, M. (2013). Cielesna geneza czasu i przestrzeni. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.

Shryock, A. (2016). Ethnography: Provocationhttps://culanth.org/fieldsights/871-ethnography-provocation [dostęp: 23.05.2018].

Simpson, P. (2010). Ecologies of Street Performance: Bodies, Affects, Politics. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Bristol: University of Bristol.

Teksty Drugie. Etnografia przedtekstowa. 2018, 1.

Thin, N. (2002). A Review of Ingold’s ‘The perception of the environment’. Anthropological Theory, 2(1), 120–121.

Thrift, N. (1996). Spatial Formations. London: Sage.

Thrift, N. (2007). Non-Representional Theory: Space / Politics / Affect. London: Routledge.

Uchiyamada, Y. (2004). A Review of Ingold’s ‘The perception of the environment’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 10(3), 723–724.

Wala, K. (2016). Ułożyć świat na nowo. Rekonstrukcja koncepcji Tima Ingolda. Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia2, 189–209.

 Wala, K. (2018). Ułożyć świat na nowo. Rekonstrukcja koncepcji Tima Ingolda (cz. II). Etnografia. Praktyki, Teorie, Doświadczenia3, 303–329.

Zawada, Ł. (2018). Fragmenty dziennika SI. Warszawa: Nisza.

Information

Information: Ethnography. Practices, Theories, Experiences, 2018, Volume 4/2018, pp. 61 - 79

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

Ułożyć świat na nowo. Rekonstrukcja koncepcji Tima Ingolda (cz. III)

English:

Arranging the world anew. Re-creation of Tim Ingold’s concept/idea (part III)

Authors

Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Katedra Etnologii i Antropologii Kulturowej

Published at: 2018

Article status: Open

Licence: None

Percentage share of authors:

Katarzyna Wala (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

Polish