FAQ

Pragmatics of Communication and Neo-Sophists: Models of Theatrical Oratory

Data publikacji: 2020

Quaestiones Oralitatis, 2020, V , s. 97-112

https://doi.org/10.34616/QO.2020.5.97.112

Autorzy

Chiara Lo Verde
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9979-2367 Orcid
Kontakt z autorem
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Pobierz pełny tekst

Tytuły

Pragmatics of Communication and Neo-Sophists: Models of Theatrical Oratory

Abstrakt

The biographer Flavius Philostratus (II-III AD), in his work Lives of the Sophists, coins the expression “Second Sophistic” to depict new outlooks and new trends in Greek oratory, focusing mostly on the II century AD. The perspective of his narration is quite clear: the performative aspects of declamations and the behavioral elements of sophists. Contemporary studies about pragmatics of communication can provide us with lens with which to read these biographies. Histrionic and theatrical characters, such as Scopelian from Clazomenae and Polemo of Laodicea, with their dramatic performances and self-presentations, let us analyze the sequence of interactions during the “ritual game” between the public and the orators. The analogic communication is to a large extent entrusted to non-verbal traits, like gestures, glance, face expressions and deportment. To avoid a dysfunctional relation between the speaker and listeners/spectators, especially in a so-called ‘face to face society’, accurate knowledge of the rules of the ‘social contact’ is required.

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię

ANDERSON 1986: G. Anderson, Philostratus. Biography and Belles Lettres in the Third Century a.D., London–Sydney– Dover 1986.

ANDERSON 1989: G. Anderson, The pepaideumenos in Action: Sophists and Their Outlook in the Early Empire, “ANRW II-Prinzipat” 33.1 (1989), pp. 79–208.

ANDERSON 1993: G. Anderson, The Second Sophistic. A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire, London–New York 1993.

BOWERSOCK 1969: G.W. Bowersock, Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire, Oxford 1969.

CIVILETTI 2002: M. Civiletti, Filostrato. Vite dei Sofisti, Milano 2002.

ESHLEMAN 2008: K. Eshleman, Defining the Circle of Sophists: Philostratus and the Construction of the Second Sophistic, “Classical Philology” 103 (2008), pp. 395–413.

ESHLEMAN 2012: K. Eshleman, The Social World of Intellectuals in the Roman Empire. Sophists, Philosophers and Christians, Cambridge 2012.

FORTENBAUGH, HUBY, SHARPLES, GUTAS 1992: W.W. Fortenbaugh, P.M. Huby, R.W. Sharples, D. Gutas, Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, part II, Leiden–New York–Köln 1992.

GLEASON 1995: M.W. Gleason, Making Men. Sophists and Self-presentation in Ancient Rome, Princeton 1995.

GOFFMAN 1967: E. Goffman, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, New York 1967.

GOFFMAN 1971: E. Goffman, Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order, New York 1971.

GOFFMAN 1974: E. Goffman, Frame Analysis. An Essay on Organization of Experience, New York 1974.

KENDON 1972: A. Kendon, Some Relationship between Body Motion and Speech, [in:] A. Siegman, B. Pope (eds.), Studies in Dyadic Communication, New York 1972, pp. 177– 210.

KORENJAK 2000: M. Korenjak, Publikum und Redner: Ihre Interaktion in der sophistischen Rhetorik der Kaiserzeit, München 2000.

RICHTER 1965: G.M.A. Richter, The Portraits of the Greeks I, II, III, London 1965.

SCHMITZ 1997: T. Schmitz, Bildung und Macht. Zur sozialen und politischen Funktionen der Zweiten Sophistik in der Griechischen Welt der Keiserzeit, München 1997.

SCHMITZ 2009: T. Schmitz, Narrator and Audience in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists, [in:] E. Bowie, J. Elsner (eds.), Philostratus, Cambridge 2009, pp. 49–68.

SIDEBOTTOM 2009: H. Sidebottom, Philostratus and the Symbolic Roles of the Sophist and Philosopher, [in:] E. Bowie, J. Elsner (eds.), Philostratus, Cambridge 2009, pp. 69–99.

SIRAGO 1989: V.A. Sirago, La seconda sofistica come espressione culturale della classe dirigente del II sec, “ANRW II-Prinzipat” 33.1 (1989), pp. 36–78.

STANTON 1973: G.R. Stanton, Sophists and Philosophers: Problems of Classification, “The American Journal of Philology” 94.4 (1973), pp. 350–364.

SWAIN 1991: S. Swain, The Reliability of Philostratus’s Lives of the Sophists, “Classical Antiquities” 10 (1991), pp. 148– 163.

WATZLAWICK, HELMICK BEAVIN, JACKSON 1967: P. Watzlawick, J. Helmick Beavin, D.D. Jackson, Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interaction Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes, New York 1967.

WHITMARSH 2001: T. Whitmarsh, Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation, Oxford 2001.

WHITMARSH 2005: T. Whitmarsh, The Second Sophistic, Oxford 2005.

Informacje

Informacje: Quaestiones Oralitatis, 2020, V , s. 97-112

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Publikacja: 2020

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Chiara Lo Verde (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Pragmatics of Communication and Neo-Sophists: Models of Theatrical Oratory

cytuj

Pobierz PDF Pobierz

pobierz pliki

RIS BIB ENDNOTE