FAQ
Logotyp Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego w Krakowie

Workaholism and work engagement: Differences and mutual relationship

Data publikacji: 19.12.2016

Jagiellonian Journal of Management, Tom 2, Numer 4 (2016), s. 275 - 286

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450114XJJM.16.022.6091

Autorzy

,
Magdalena Jaworek
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
Wszystkie publikacje autora →
Anna Dyląg
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Workaholism and work engagement: Differences and mutual relationship

Abstrakt

The main purpose of the study was to analyse the relationship between workaholism and work engagement which, in the light of current research, constitute two separate constructs, although they are in some way related to each other. In addition, their relationship with demographic data, such as, age, gender, type of position was examined.
The cross-sectional study, with the use of questionnaire methods (the Polish version of UWES and DUWAS), included in its scope 967 economically active people from Polish organizations, representing various professions.
The analysis of relationships (with the use of the method of structural equation modelling) of workaholism and work engagement showed – in spite of weak association through absorption – the separate nature of the constructs studied. Regarding the relationship with demographic factors, women obtained higher scores in all dimensions of workaholism and work engagement; older workers showed greater engagement and ­greater compulsion to work than younger workers; managers, when compared with non-managers, are characterized by a higher level of excessive work.
The results showed that workaholism and work engagement are two distinct phenomena, although they are related to each other to a little extent. The obtained differences in the examined constructs in terms of demographic factors provide a starting point for further research and analysis of their specific characteristics and causes.

Bibliografia

Arbuckle, J.L. (2006). AMOS (version 6.0). Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.

Burke, R.J. (1999). Workaholism in organizations: Gender differences. Sex Roles, 41(5/6), 333–345.

Burke, R.J., & Fiskenbaum, L. (2009). Work motivations, work outcomes, and health: Passion versus addiction. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 257–263.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Przepływ. Taszów: Biblioteka Moderatora.

del Líbano, M., Lorens, S., Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2010). Validity of brief workaholism scale. Psicothema, 22(1), 143–150.

Derbis, R., & Baka, Ł. (2011). Znaczenie wsparcia społecznego zaangażowania pracę dla związku stresorów pracy wypalenia zawodowego. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 17(2), 277–287.

Dudek, B. (2008). Pracoholizm – szkodliwy skutek nadmiernego zaangażowania pracę. ­Medycyna Pracy, 59(3), 247–254.

Fassel, D. (1990). Working Oourselves to Death: The High Costs of Workaholism, the Rewards of Recovery. San Francisco: Harper Collins.

Golińska, L. (2005). Skala do badania zaabsorbowania pracą. Acta Universitatis Lodzensis. ­Folia Psychologia, 9, 17–29.

Golińska, L. (2006). Pracoholizm małżonka rodzica percepcji odczuciach współpartnera dzieci. Nowiny Psychologiczne, 1, 47–54.

Golińska, L. (2008). Pracoholizm. Warszawa: Difin.

Gorgievski, M.J., Bakker, A.B., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2010). Work engagement and workaholism: Comparing the self-employed and salaried employees. The Journal of Positive Psychology5(1), 83–96.

Ho, V.T., Wong, S.S., & Lee, C.H. (2011). tale of passion: Linking job passion and cognitive engagement to employee work performance. Journal of Management Studies48(1), 26–47.

Hornowska, E., & Paluchowski, W.J. (2007). Praca – skrywana obsesja. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Jaworek, M. & Dyląg, A. (2015). Perception of work environment among women and men – workload and autonomy in relation to job engagement. Jagiellonian Journal of Management, 1(3), 155–174.

Killinger, B. (2007). Pracoholicy. Szkoła przetrwania. Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy REBIS.

Kożusznik, M.W., Dyląg, A., & Jaworek, M.A. (2014). The Polish adaptation of the short form of the Dutch Work Addiction Scale (Chapter 29). In T. Marek, W. Karwowski, M. Frankowicz, J. Kantola, P. Zgaga (eds.). Human Factors of Global Society: System of Systems Perspective. New York: CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 311–318.

Machlowitz, M. (1980). Workaholics: Living with Them, Working with Them. New York: Simon & Schuster.

McMillan, L.H.W., & O’Driscoll, M.P. (2006). Exploring new frontiers to generate an integrated definition of workaholism. In R. Burke (ed.), Research Companion to Working Time and Addiction. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 89–107.

Ng, T.W.H., Sorensen, K.L., & Feldman, D.C. (2007). Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: conceptual integration and extension. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(1), 111–136.

Oates, W.E. (1968). On being “workaholic.” Pastoral Psychology19(8), 16–20.

Oates, W.E. (1971). Confessions of Workaholic: The Facts about Work Addiction. New York: World Publishing.

Robinson, B.E. (1999). The work addiction risk test: Development tentative measure of workaholism. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 199–210.

Schaufeli, W.B., & Bakker, A.B. (2003). Work Engagement Utrecht Scale. Utrecht: Preliminary Manual.

Schaufeli, W.B., Shimazu, A., & Taris, T.W. (2009). Being driven to work excessively hard: The evaluation of two-factor measure of workaholism in the Netherlands and Japan. Cross-Culture Research43(4), 320–348.

Schaufeli, W.B., Taris, T.W., & Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(2), 173–203.

Scott, K.S., Moore, K.S., & Miceli, M.P. (1997). An exploration of the meaning and consequences of workaholism. Human Relations, 50(3), 287–314.

Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W.B., & Taris, T.W. (2010). How does workaholism affect worker health and performance? The mediating role of coping. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17(2), 154–160.

Spence, J.T., & Robbins, A.S. (1992). Workaholism: Definition, measurment, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58(1), 160–178.

Stoeber, J., Childs, J.H., Hayward, J.A., & Feast, A.R. (2011). Passion and motivation for studying: predicting academic engagement and burnout in university students. Educational Psychology, 31(4), 513–128.

Szabowska-Walaszczyk, A., Zawadzka, A.M., & Wojtaś, M. (2011). Zaangażowanie pracę jego korelaty: Adaptacja skali UWES autorstwa Schaufeliego Bakkera. Psychologia Jakości Życia, 10(1), 57–74.

Wojdyło, K. (2004). Pracoholizm – rozważania nad osobowościowymi wyznacznikami obsesji pracy. Nowiny Psychologiczne, 2, 55–75.

Wojdyło, K. (2005). Kwestionariusz Pracoholizmu (WART) – adaptacja narzędzia wstępna analiza właściwości psychometrycznych. Nowiny Psychologiczne, 4, 71–83.

Wojdyło, K. (2006). Osobowość pracoholiczna: Właściwości mechanizmy regulacyjne. Nowi­ny Psychologiczne, 2, 23–36.

Informacje

Informacje: Jagiellonian Journal of Management, Tom 2, Numer 4 (2016), s. 275 - 286

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Angielski:

Workaholism and work engagement: Differences and mutual relationship

Polski:

Workaholism and work engagement: Differences and mutual relationship

Autorzy

Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków

Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków

Publikacja: 19.12.2016

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: Żadna

Udział procentowy autorów:

Magdalena Jaworek (Autor) - 50%
Anna Dyląg (Autor) - 50%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski