Ingrid Lanczová
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 16, Zeszyt 3, Tom 16 (2023), s. 441 - 446
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.23.031.18395Ingrid Lanczová
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 17, Zeszyt 3, Early Access
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.24.022.21006Ingrid Lanczová
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 17, Zeszyt 3, Early Access
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.24.032.21016Ingrid Lanczová
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 15, Zeszyt 3, Tom 15 (2022), s. 485 - 488
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.22.032.16180Ingrid Lanczová
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 13, Zeszyt 3, Tom 13 (2020), s. 403 - 406
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.20.026.12522Ingrid Lanczová
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 14, Zeszyt 3, Tom 14 (2021), s. 421 - 424
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.21.034.14099Ingrid Lanczová
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 12, Zeszyt 3, Tom 12 (2019), s. 451 - 453
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.19.018.10939Ingrid Lanczová
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 15, Zeszyt 2, Tom 15 (2022), s. 339 - 352
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.22.023.15726The author reviews mental disorder as a ground for divorce in the Czechoslovak Act No. 320 of 1919 Coll. This Act was called the Marriage Amendment and was in effect for the Czech countries until 1950. The author considers the wording of the Act itself, the explanatory report, jurisprudence, and the court practice. The author compares it to the Hungarian marriage law that continued to be effective in Slovakia until 1950. It was Act No. XXXI of 1894 (the so-called Marriage Act), which regulated divorces in Slovakia, despite adopting the Czechoslovak Marriage Amendment. The Hungarian Marriage Act did not recognise mental illness as a ground for divorce. However, it was a controversial topic in both legal environments, the Hungarian and Czechoslovak.
Ingrid Lanczová
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Tom 15, Zeszyt 3, Tom 15 (2022), s. 493 - 503
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.22.034.16182