1732-8160

Evidence for the Relevance of Secondary Stress in German: Prosodic Restrictions in Verbal Prefixation with ver-

Vogt

Barbara

author

Dipartimento di Scienze umane, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, Viale Nizza 14, 67100 L'Aquila

Correspondence to: Barbara Vogt barbaramaria.vogt@univaq.it

21 03 2019

Special Volume 1 (2019) Special Volume 153 169

2019

This contribution deals with secondary stress in Modern Standard German (MSG) and its relevance in affixation using the verbal prefix ver-. While the pattern ver+stressed syllable or ver+schwa is allowed, ver+unstressed syllable is avoided in contemporary German (see also Kaltenbacher 1999). Diachronical data reveals that in earlier stages this prosodic restriction was not as strong as in MSG. The consistency with which verbs with the pattern ver+unstressed syllable are discarded in MSG (confirmed by look-ups in corpora and dictionaries) is a strong argument for the hypothesis that the relinquishment is due to a form of blocking related to the stress properties of the direct base: The affix ver- needs a direct base with some initial prominence, that is with primary or secondary stress. The only (apparent) exception to this stress condition is a base containing a schwa syllable which seems to be “invisible” for the stress-seeking prefix. Verbal derivation with the prefix ver-demonstrates that the stress properties of the base have to be taken into account also with regard to secondary stress. The data provided in this paper can count as further evidence for the existence and relevance of secondary stress in Modern Standard German and its interaction with morphology

Alber Birgit (1997). Il sistema metrico dei prestiti del Tedesco. Aspetti e problemi della teoria prosodica. Padova: University of Padova. PhD dissertation.

Alber Birgit (1998). Stress preservation in German loan words. In Phonology and Morphology of the Germanic Languages, Wolfgang Kehrein and Richard Wiese (eds.), 113–114. Tübingen: Niemeyer. ROA#314

Alber Birgit (in press). Word-stress in Germanic. In Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics, Michael T. Putnam and Richard Page (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berg Thomas (2008). Emphatic stress shift in German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissen-schaft 27(2), 165–187.

Becker Thomas (1998). Das Vokalsystem der deutschen Standardsprache. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.

Domahs Ulrike, Wiese Richard, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky Ina, Schlesewsky Matthias (2008). The processing of German word stress: Evidence for the prosodic hierarchy. Phonology 25(1), 1–36.

Duden (2005). Aussprachewörterbuch, Vol. 6. Max Mangold and Dudenredaktion (eds.). Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.

Duden (2006). Die Grammatik, Vol. 4. Max Mangold and Dudenredaktion (eds.). Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.

Fleischer Wolfgang, Barz Ingeborg (2012). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegen-wartssprache. 4. ed. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.

Henzen Wolfgang (1956). Der heutige Bestand der Verben mit ‚ver-’: Vorstudie zu einer Erforschung der Wortschatzbewegungen. In Fragen und Forschungen im Bereich und Umkreis der germanischen Philologie, Elisabeth Karg-Gasterstädt and Johannes Erben (eds.), 173–189. Berlin: Akademieverlag.

Ito Junko, Mester Armin (2009). The extended prosodic word. In Phonological Domains: Universals and Derivations, Baris Kabak and Janet Grijzenhout (eds.), 135–194. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.

Jessen Michael (1999). German. In Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, Harry van der Hulst (ed.), 273–334. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Kager René (2000). Stem stress and peak correspondence in Dutch. In Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition, Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw and Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), 121–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kager René, Zonneveld Wim (1986). Schwa, syllables, and extrametricality in Dutch. The Linguistic Review 5(3), 197–221.

Kaltenbacher Erika (1999). Prosodische Aspekte der Verbpräfigierung. Linguistische Berichte 180, 447–466.

Kleber Felicitas, Klipphahn Nadine (2006). An acoustic investigation of secondary stress in German. Arbeitsberichte Institut für Phonetik Kiel 37, 1–18. [URL: http://www.ipds.unikiel.de/pub_exx/aipuk/aipuk_37/37_1_KleberKlipphahn.pdf; accessed January 11, 2018]

Knaus Johannes, Wiese Richard, Domahs Ulrike (2011). Secondary stress is distributed rhythmically with words: An EEG study on German. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Phonetic Sciences 2011, 1114–1117. Hong Kong.

Krech Eva-Maria, Stock Eberhard, Hirschfeld Ursula, Anders Lutz Christian (2009). Deutsches Aussprachewörterbuch. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.

Kristoffersen Gjert (2007). The Phonology of Norwegian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Löhken Sylvia (1997). Deutsche Wortprosodie: Abschwächungs- und Tilgungsvorgänge. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.

Mater Erich (2006). Gesamtverzeichnis deutscher Verben der Gegenwartssprache. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang Verlag.

Moulton William G. (1962). The Sounds of English and German. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Prince Alan, Smolensky Paul (2004) [1993]. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

Quasthoff Uwe, Fiedler Sabine, Hallsteinsdóttir Erla (eds.) (2011). Frequency Dictionary German. Häufigkeitswörterbuch Deutsch. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.

Raffelsiefen Renate (1996). Gaps in word formation. In Interfaces in Phonology, Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.), 194–209. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Shih Stephanie (2017). Phonological influences in syntactic choice. In The Morphosyntax-Phonology Connection, Vera Gribanova and Stephanie Shih (eds.), 223–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vogt Barbara (2015). Initial secondary stress in German. In pS-prominenceS. Prominences in Linguistics. Proceedings of the International Conference, Viterbo 12–14.12.2013, Amedeo De Dominicis (ed.), 114–134, Disucom Press: Viterbo.

Wiese Richard (2000). The Phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.