1689-927X Dlaczego reprezentacje nie trzymają się modeli dynamicznych? Why representations don’t stick with dynamic models? Korbak Tomasz author Uniwersytet Warszawski 039bjqg32 Correspondence to: Tomasz Korbak 26 11 2014 Tom 7 2014 21 30 Copyright © 2014 2014 1 Brooks R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. „Artificial Intelligence” 47, s. 139–159. 2 Clark A., Toribio J. (1994). Doing without representing? „Synthese” 101, s. 401–431. 3 Clark A. (1997). The dynamical challenge. „Cognitive Science” 21, s. 461–481. 4 Clark A. (2001). Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science. New York–Oxford: Oxford University Press. 5 Dennett D. (1998). Revolution, no! Reform, si! „Brain and Behavioral Sciences” 21, s. 636–637. 6 Eliasmith C. (1997). Computation and dynamical models of mind. „Minds and Machines” 7, s. 531–541. 7 Gelder T. van (1995). What might cognition be, if not computation? „The Journal of Philosophy” 26, s. 345–381. 8 Gelder T. van, Port R. (1995). It’s about time: an overview of the dynamical approach to cognition [w:] R. Port, T. van Gelder (red.), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge–London: MIT Press. 9 Gelder T. van (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 21, s. 615–665. 10 Grush R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 27, s. 377–396. 11 Miłkowski M. (2013). Explaining the Computational Mind. Cambridge–London: MIT Press. 12 Mitchell M. (1998). A complex-systems perspective on the “computation vs. dynamics” debate in cognitive science [w:] M.A. Gernsbacher, S.J. Derry (red.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society – CogSci 1998, s. 710–715. 13 Newell A., Simon H. (1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. „Communications of the ACM” 19, s. 113–126. 14 Port R., Gelder T. van (red.) (1995). Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge–London: MIT Press. 15 Smith L., Thelen E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 7, s. 343–348. 16 Smolensky P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 11, s. 1–74. 17 Thompson E. (2010). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard: Harvard University Press. 18 Varela F., Thompson E., Rosch E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge–London: MIT Press. 19 Wiener N. (1948). Cybernetics; or, Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Paris: Technology Press.