<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en"
    xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <processing-meta tagset-family="jats" base-tagset="publishing" mathml-version="2.0" table-model="xhtml"/>
    <front>
                        
                        <journal-meta>
            <issn>1689-927X</issn>
                                </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <title-group>
                                    <article-title>Kognitywistyczne spojrzenie na skale psychometryczne: kiedy trudne jest łatwiejsze od łatwego</article-title>
                                    <article-title>The Cognitive Approach Towards Psychometric Scales: When Difficult is Easier than Easy</article-title>
                            </title-group>

                        <contrib-group>
                                                            <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
                            <name>
                                <surname>Górkiewicz</surname>
                                <given-names>Maciej </given-names>
                            </name>
                            <role>author</role>
                                                                                                                                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
                                                                                                        <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/>
                                                                                        <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-1"/>
                        </contrib>
                                                </contrib-group>

                                                                                        <aff id="aff-1">
                    <institution-wrap>
                        <institution>Zakład Epidemiologii i Badań Populacyjnych, Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego, Wydział Nauk o Zdrowiu, Uniwersytet Jagielloński Collegium Medicum, Kraków</institution>
                                            </institution-wrap>
                </aff>
                                                                                            <aff id="aff-2">
                    <institution-wrap>
                        <institution>Collegium Medicum Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego</institution>
                                            </institution-wrap>
                </aff>
                            
            <author-notes>
                                    <corresp id="cor-1">Correspondence to: Maciej  Górkiewicz <email></email></corresp>
                            </author-notes>

                            <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2011-12-15">
                    <day>15</day>
                    <month>12</month>
                    <year>2011</year>
                </pub-date>
            
            <volume>Tom 4</volume>
            <issue>2010</issue>
                        <fpage>81</fpage>
                                    <lpage>86</lpage>
            
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2011</copyright-statement>
                                    <copyright-year>2011</copyright-year>
                            </permissions>

            <funding-group specific-use="Crossref">
                <funding-statement></funding-statement>
            </funding-group>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        
    </body>
    <back>
                    <ref-list>
                                                                                <ref id="B1">
                            <label>1</label>
                            <article-title>Bereby-Meyer Y., Meyer J., Flasher O.M. (2002). Prospect Theory Analysis of Guessing in Multiple Choice Tests. „Journal of Behavioral Decision Making” 15(4), s. 313–327.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B2">
                            <label>2</label>
                            <article-title>Bjorner J., Ware J., Kosinski M. (2003). Th e Potential Synergy Between Cognitive Models and Modern Psychometric Models. „Quality of Life Research” 12, s. 261–274.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B3">
                            <label>3</label>
                            <article-title>Chan J.C.K., McDermott K.B. (2006). Remembering Pragmatic Information. „Applied Cognitive Psychology” 20(5), s. 633–639.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B4">
                            <label>4</label>
                            <article-title>Clemen R.T. (2001). Naturalistic Decision Making and Decision Analysis. „Journal of Behavioral Decision Making” 14(5), s. 359–360.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B5">
                            <label>5</label>
                            <article-title>Collins D. (2003). Pretesting Survey Instruments, An Overview of Cognitive Methods. „Quality of Life Research” 12, s. 229–338.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B6">
                            <label>6</label>
                            <article-title>Fischer G.H., Molenaar I.W. (1995). Rasch Models – Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B7">
                            <label>7</label>
                            <article-title>Ghosh M. (1995). Inconsistent MLE for the Rasch Model. „Statistics and Probability Letters” 23, s. 165–170.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B8">
                            <label>8</label>
                            <article-title>Martin M., Kosinski M., Bjorner J.B., Ware J.E., MacLean R., Li T. (2007). Item Response Theory Methods Can Improve the Measurement of Physical Function by Combining the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire and the SF-36 Physical Function Scale. „Quality of Life Research” 16, s. 647–660.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B9">
                            <label>9</label>
                            <article-title>Masters G.N. (1982). A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring. „Psychometrika” 47, s. 149–173.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B10">
                            <label>10</label>
                            <article-title>Neisser U. (1994). Multiple Systems: A New Approach to Cognitive Theory. „European Journal of Cognitive Psychology” 6(3), s. 225–241.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B11">
                            <label>11</label>
                            <article-title>Schmidt F.L., Le H., Ilies R. (2003). Beyond Alpha, An Empirical Examination of the Effects of Different Sources of Measurement Error on Reliability Estimates for Measures of Individual-Differences Constructs. „Psychological Methods” 8(2) s. 206–224.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B12">
                            <label>12</label>
                            <article-title>Slovic P. (1995). The Construction of Preferences. „Am. Psychologist” 50, s. 364–371.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B13">
                            <label>13</label>
                            <article-title>Szałek P. (2004). Pamięć jako akt intencjonalny (trzy teorie psychologiczne). „Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria” 13(49), s. 23–38.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B14">
                            <label>14</label>
                            <article-title>Tennant A., Penta M., Tesio L., Grimby G., Th onnard J.-L., Slade A., Lawton G., Simone A., Carter J., Lundgren-Nilsson A., Tripolski M., Ring H., Biering-Sorensen F., Marincek C., Burger H., Phillips S. (2004). Disordered Thresholds: An Example from the Functional Independence Measure. „Rasch Measurement Transactions” 17(4), s. 945–948, http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt174a.htm (dostęp 29.06.2011).</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B15">
                            <label>15</label>
                            <article-title>Ware J.E., Kosinski M., Dewey J.E. (2000). How to Score Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                </ref-list>
            </back>
</article>
