<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en"
    xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <processing-meta tagset-family="jats" base-tagset="publishing" mathml-version="2.0" table-model="xhtml"/>
    <front>
                        
                        <journal-meta>
            <issn>1689-927X</issn>
                                </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <title-group>
                                    <article-title>Czy empiryczne świadectwa na rzecz „ucieleśnienia” poznania są anomaliami w świetle klasycznych koncepcji procesów poznawczych? Na przykładzie problemu natury pojęć</article-title>
                                    <article-title>Are Empirical Proofs of Embodied Cognition Anomalies in the Context of Classical Models of Cognition?</article-title>
                            </title-group>

                        <contrib-group>
                                                            <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
                            <name>
                                <surname>Gładziejewski</surname>
                                <given-names>Paweł </given-names>
                            </name>
                            <role>author</role>
                                                                                                                                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
                                                                                        <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-1"/>
                        </contrib>
                                                </contrib-group>

                                                                                        <aff id="aff-1">
                    <institution-wrap>
                        <institution>Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu</institution>
                                            </institution-wrap>
                </aff>
                            
            <author-notes>
                                    <corresp id="cor-1">Correspondence to: Paweł  Gładziejewski <email></email></corresp>
                            </author-notes>

                            <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2011-12-15">
                    <day>15</day>
                    <month>12</month>
                    <year>2011</year>
                </pub-date>
            
            <volume>Tom 4</volume>
            <issue>2010</issue>
                        <fpage>73</fpage>
                                    <lpage>80</lpage>
            
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2011</copyright-statement>
                                    <copyright-year>2011</copyright-year>
                            </permissions>

            <funding-group specific-use="Crossref">
                <funding-statement></funding-statement>
            </funding-group>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        
    </body>
    <back>
                    <ref-list>
                                                                                <ref id="B1">
                            <label>1</label>
                            <article-title>Barsalou L. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 22, s. 577–660.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B2">
                            <label>2</label>
                            <article-title>Barsalou L. (2009). Simulation, Situated Conceptualization and Prediction. „Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B” 364, s. 1281–1289.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B3">
                            <label>3</label>
                            <article-title>Costello F.J., Keane M.T. (2000). Efficient Creativity: Constraint Guided Conceptual Combination. „Cognitive Science” 24(2), s. 299–349.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B4">
                            <label>4</label>
                            <article-title>Fodor J. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B5">
                            <label>5</label>
                            <article-title>Gallese V. (2007). Before and Below „Theory of Mind”: Embodied Simulation and the Neural Correlates of Social Cognition. „Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B” 362, s. 659–669.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B6">
                            <label>6</label>
                            <article-title>Kuhn T. (2001). Struktura Rewolucji Naukowych. Ttłum. H. Ostromęcka. Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B7">
                            <label>7</label>
                            <article-title>Machery E. (2007). Concept Empiricism: a Methodological Critique. „Cognition” 104, s. 19–46.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B8">
                            <label>8</label>
                            <article-title>Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Barsalou L. (2003). Verifying Properties from Different Modalities for Concepts Produces Switching Costs. „Psychological Science” 14, s. 119–124.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B9">
                            <label>9</label>
                            <article-title>Simmons W.K., Ramjee V., Beauchamp M.S., McRae K., Martin A., Barsalou L. (2007). A Common Neural Substrate for Perceiving and Knowing about Color. „Neuropsychologia” 45, s. 2802–2810.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B10">
                            <label>10</label>
                            <article-title>Wu L.L, Barsalou L. (2009). Perceptual Simulation in Conceptual Combination: Evidence from Property Generation. „Acta Psychologica” 132, s. 173–189.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                </ref-list>
            </back>
</article>
