1689-927X Istotność statystyczna II. Pułapki interpretacyjne Statistical significance II. Interpretive pitfalls Wolski Piotr author Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Polska, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków Correspondence to: Piotr Wolski 16 03 2017 Tom 9 2016 59 70 Copyright © 2017 2017 1 Bem, D.J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407–425. doi:10.1037/a0021524 2 Bem, D.J., Utts, J., Johnson, W.O. (2011). Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 716–719. doi:10.1037/a0024777 3 Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. doi:10.1177/0956797613504966 4 Fenton, N., Neil, M. (2011). Avoiding probabilistic reasoning fallacies in legal practice using bayesian networks. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 36, 114. 5 Fisher, R.A. (1971). The Design of Experiments (wyd. 8). New York: Hafner Publishing Company. 6 Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Mindless statistics. Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(5), 587–606. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033 7 Haller, H., Krauss, S. (2002). Misinterpretations of significance: A problem students share with their teachers? Methods of Psychological Research Online, 7(1). 8 Halsey, L.G., Curran-Everett, D., Vowler, S.L., Drummond, G.B. (2015). The fickle P value generates irreproducible results. Nature Methods, 12(3), 179–185. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3288 9 Kalinowski, P., Fidler, F., Cumming, G. (2008). Overcoming the inverse probability fallacy. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4(4), 152–158. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.4.4.152 10 Kirk, R.E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746. 11 Meehl, P.E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 806–834. 12 Oakes, M.W. (1986). Statistical Inference. A Commentary for the Social and Behavioural Sciences (s. 185). New York: Wiley. 13 Salsburg, D. (2013). The Lady Tasting Tea. How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century. New York: Henry Holt and Company. 14 Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. 15 Wagenmakers, E.J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H.L. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 426–432. doi:10.1037/a0022790 16 Westover, M.B., Westover, K.D., Bianchi, M.T. (2011). Significance testing as perverse probabilistic reasoning. BMC Medicine, 9, 20. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-20 17 Wilkinson, L., APA Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604. 18 Wojciszke, B. (2004). Systematycznie modyfikowane autoreplikacje: Logika programu badań empirycznych w psychologii. W: J. Brzeziński (red.), Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Wybór tekstów (s. 44–60). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.