2391-7997
The Getty Trust Case: Human Rights, Property Issues, and Cultural Heritage Protection
Zaręba
Szymon
author
Instytut Nauk Prawnych Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Correspondence to: Szymon Zaręba s.zareba@inp.pan.pl
11
12
2025
2/2025 (11)
2025
207
222
Copyright © 2025
2025
This article examines the 2024 judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in <em>J. Paul Getty Trust and Others v. Italy</em>, concerning the ownership and cultural heritage status of the ancient bronze statue <em>Atleta di Fano</em> (<em>Victorious Youth</em>). It analyses how the ECtHR addresses questions of cultural property and its inclusion in a nation’s cultural heritage. The judgment demonstrates that, when evaluating the cultural heritage value of a work of art for a particular country, the Court considers the issue of possible state ownership to be of little importance, and instead takes a range of other, even relatively unconventional factors into account, provided that the national authorities have done so as well. This approach reveals the ECtHR’s willingness to grant States Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights a wide margin of appreciation in determining both the relevant facts and their legal interpretation. Moreover, the judgment in <em>J. Paul Getty Trust and Others v. Italy</em> shows a degree of deference even towards domestic findings that may appear less persuasive. Such reasoning ultimately benefits states that have long maintained robust legal frameworks for the appropriation of discovered cultural property, reinforcing their capacity to protect and retain objects of archaeological heritage.
[
Bjorge E., The Convention as a Living Instrument: Rooted in the Past, Looking to the Future, “Human Rights Law Journal” 2017, Vol. 36(7-12).
]
[
Chechi A., Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and Right to Take Part in Cultural Life at the ECtHR: A Critical Examination of Different Approaches to Recurring Issues, “Ordine Internazionale e Diritti Umani” 2025, Vol. 2.
]
[
Chechi A., Contel R., Renold M.-A., Case Victorious Youth – Italy v. J. Paul Getty Museum, https://plone.unige.ch/art-adr/cases-affaires/victorious-youth-2013-italy-v-j-paul-getty-museum [accessed: 15.07.2025].
]
[
Chen R., Healing the Past: Recovery of Chinese Cultural Objects Lost During the Colonial Era, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2022, Vol. 8(2).
]
[
Codice della Navigazione [Italian Navigation Code], Gazzetta Ufficiale no. 93, 18 April 1942.
]
[
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 4 November 1950, ETS No. 005.
]
[
Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 14 November 1970, 823 UNTS 231.
]
[
Corte d’Appello di Perugia, Judgment no. 15, 10 of 27 January 1967.
]
[
Corte d’Appello di Roma, Judgment no. 2089 of 18 November 1970.
]
[
Corte di Cassazione Penale, Judgment no. 22 of 2 January 2019.
]
[
Corte Suprema di Cassazione, Judgment no. 1291 of 22 May 1968.
]
[
Council of Europe, Articles 8-11, https://www.coe.int/en/web/echr-toolkit/les-articles-8-a-11 [accessed: 15.02.2025].
]
[
Cryan J.M., The Battle of the Bronze: International Law and the Restitution of Cultural Property, “Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce” 2019, Vol. 47(1).
]
[
Curfman D., Thar Be Treasure Here: Rights to Ancient Shipwrecks in International Waters. A New Policy Regime, “Washington University Law Review” 2008, Vol. 86(1).
]
[
de Clippele M.-S., Who Owns Art over Time? The Judicial Saga of the Statue of Victorious Youth in Getty Trust v. Italy, “Strasbourg Observers”, 16 August 2024, https://strasbourgobservers.com/2024/08/16/who-owns-art-over-time-the-judicial-saga-of-the-statue-of-victorious-youth-in-getty-trust-v-italy/ [accessed: 15.02.2025].
]
[
Deconinck C., Prized Greek Bronze Sculpture Can Be Retrieved by Italians from US Getty Museum, ECHR Rules, “Brussels Signal”, 3 May 2024, https://brusselssignal.eu/2024/05/prized-greek-bronze-sculpture-can-be-retrieved-by-italians-from-us-getty-museum-echr-rules/ [accessed: 15.02.2025].
]
[
Dromgoole S., Underwater Cultural Heritage and International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013.
]
[
European Court of Human Rights, Beyeler v. Italy, Application No. 33202/96, Judgment of 5 January 2000.
]
[
European Court of Human Rights, J. Paul Getty Trust and Others v. Italy, Application No. 35271/19, Judgment of 2 May 2024.
]
[
European Court of Human Rights, Marckx v. Belgium, Application no. 6833/74, Judgment of 13 June 1979.
]
[
European Court of Human Rights, Rauno Koivusaari and Others v. Finland, Application no. 20690/06, Decision of 23 February 2010.
]
[
European Court of Human Rights, Ruspoli Morenes v. Spain, Application No. 28979/07, Judgment of 28 June 2011.
]
[
European Court of Human Rights, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 5856/72, Judgment of 25 April 1978.
]
[
European Court Upholds Italy’s Right to Claim Ancient Greek Statue from Getty Museum, “Wanted in Rome”, 2 May 2024, https://www.wantedinrome.com/news/italy-getty-museum-victorious-youth-statue.html [accessed: 15.02.2025].
]
[
Fincham D., Transnational Forfeiture of the Getty Bronze, “Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal” 2014, Vol. 32.
]
[
Herman A., The ‘Getty Bronze’ at the European Court of Human Rights, 21 May 2024, https://ial.uk.com/getty-bronze/ [accessed: 15.02.2025].
]
[
Kahn L.J., Sunken Treasures: Conflicts between Historic Preservation Law and the Maritime Law of Finds, “Tulane Environmental Law Journal” 1994, Vol. 7(2).
]
[
Lanciotti A., Claiming Restitution of Underwater Cultural Heritage: The Getty Bronze Case, “Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze” 2021, Vol. 25(2).
]
[
Legge 1 giugno 1939, n. 1089. Tutela delle cose di interesse artistico e storico [Law No. 1089 of 1 June 1939 on the Protection of Objects of Artistic or Historical Interest], Gazzetta Ufficiale no. 184, 8 August 1939.
]
[
Letsas G., The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and its Legitimacy, in: A. Føllesdal, B. Peters, G. Ulfstein (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013.
]
[
Li L., Sargent A.L.B., The Getty Bronze and the Limits of Restitution, “Chapman Law Review” 2017, Vol. 20(1).
]
[
Oxman B.H., Marine Archaeology and the International Law of the Sea, “Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts” 1988, Vol. 12.
]
[
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 20 March 1952, ETS No. 009.
]
[
Sapienza R., L’“Atleta di Fano” torna in Italia?, “Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale” 2024, Vol. 18(3).
]
[
Schrader A., A Court Rules the Getty Museum’s Prized Ancient Greek Statue Belongs to Italy, “Artnet”, 3 May 2024, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/court-determines-italy-owns-victorious-youth-getty-museum-2481038 [accessed: 15.02.2025].
]
[
Scudeler E., The Legality of Confiscation Orders of Stolen Cultural Property: The Fano Athlete Case before the European Court of Human Rights, “Italian Journal of Public Law” 2025, Vol. 17(1).
]
[
Solaro L., Case Review: Getty v. Italy (2024), 24 July 2024, https://itsartlaw.org/2024/07/24/case-review-getty-v-italy-2024/ [accessed: 15.07.2025].
]
[
Tribunale di Perugia, Judgment no. 181, 2 of 18 May 1966.
]
[
Tribunale ordinario di Pesaro, Order no. 2042/07 of 10 February 2010.
]
[
UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, 2 November 2001, 2562 UNTS 1.
]
[
UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 2421 UNTS 457.
]
[
Valentin P., The Victorious Youth: A Statue’s Odyssey and the Battle for Cultural Heritage, 26 June 2024, https://www.artlawyersassociation.com/post/the-victorious-youth-a-statue-s-odyssey-and-the-battle-for-cultural-heritage [accessed: 15.02.2025].
]
[
Visconti A., La Corte EDU sulla confisca obbligatoria di beni culturali illecitamente esportati: la vicenda dell’‘Atleta vittorioso’, “Diritto Penale Contemporaneo” 2024, Vol. 2.
]
[
von der Decken K., Article 4 of the 1970 UNESCO Convention: Cultural Property Forming Part of the Cultural Heritage of Each State, in: A.F. Vrdoljak, A. Jakubowski, A. Chechi (eds.), The 1970 UNESCO and 1995 UNIDROIT Conventions on Stolen or Illegally Transferred Cultural Property: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2024.
]
[
Walsh R.P., The 1995 UNIDROIT Convention’s Influence on the Development of Customary International Law for the Return of Cultural Property: The European Court of Human Rights 2024 Judgment in the Case of The J. Paul Getty Trust v. Italy, https://1995unidroitcap.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/FINAL_Extended-Note_European-Court-of- HR-CASE-OF-THE-J.-PAUL-GETTY-TRUST-AND-OTHERS-v.-ITALY.pdf [accessed: 15.02.2025].
]