<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en"
    xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <processing-meta tagset-family="jats" base-tagset="publishing" mathml-version="2.0" table-model="xhtml"/>
    <front>
                        
                        <journal-meta>
            <issn>1732-8160</issn>
                                </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <title-group>
                                    <article-title>On the Derivation of Denominal Adjectives in Polish</article-title>
                                    <article-title></article-title>
                            </title-group>

                        <contrib-group>
                                                            <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
                            <name>
                                <surname>Wasak</surname>
                                <given-names>Sebastian</given-names>
                            </name>
                            <role>author</role>
                                                                                                                                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
                                                                                        <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-1"/>
                        </contrib>
                                                </contrib-group>

                                                                                        <aff id="aff-1">
                    <institution-wrap>
                        <institution>Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II</institution>
                                                    <institution-id institution-id-type="ROR">765876</institution-id>
                                            </institution-wrap>
                </aff>
                            
            <author-notes>
                                    <corresp id="cor-1">Correspondence to: Sebastian Wasak <email>sebastian.wasak@kul.pl</email></corresp>
                            </author-notes>

                            <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2025-12-01">
                    <day>01</day>
                    <month>12</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </pub-date>
            
            <volume>Vol. 20, Issue 3</volume>
            <issue>Volume 20 (2025)</issue>
                        <fpage>99</fpage>
                                    <lpage>117</lpage>
            
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025</copyright-statement>
                                    <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
                            </permissions>

            <funding-group specific-use="Crossref">
                <funding-statement></funding-statement>
            </funding-group>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        This research investigates the derivation of denominal qualitative adjectives in Polish formed by the suffixes ‑&lt;em&gt;liwy&lt;/em&gt;, ‑&lt;em&gt;ny&lt;/em&gt;, ‑&lt;em&gt;sty&lt;/em&gt;, and ‑&lt;em&gt;owy &lt;/em&gt;(e.g. &lt;em&gt;wadliwy &lt;/em&gt;‘defective’, &lt;em&gt;pomocny &lt;/em&gt;‘helpful’, &lt;em&gt;górzysty &lt;/em&gt;‘mountainous’, &lt;em&gt;kolorowy &lt;/em&gt;‘colourful’). Employing an all-syntactic approach to word formation (and specifically the Distributed Morphology framework), the study investigates whether such adjectives are morphosyntactically denominal, that is, whether their internal structure projects a nominal head. To establish this, the examined adjectives have been subjected to the test diagnosing whether they can support anaphoric nouns and pronouns. The test reveals that denominal qualitative adjectives can support anaphoric nouns, but unlike denominal relational adjectives, denominal qualitative adjectives cannot support anaphoric pronouns in Polish. The reason for this difference is argued here to reflect a non-phasal status of the nominal head in the structure of denominal qualitative adjectives.
    </body>
    <back>
                    <ref-list>
                                                                                <ref id="B1">
                            <label>1</label>
                            <article-title>Alexiadou Artemis (2001). Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B2">
                            <label>2</label>
                            <article-title>Alexiadou Artemis, Gehrke Berit, &amp;amp; Schäfer Florian (2014). The argument structure of adjectival participles revisited. Lingua 149: 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.018.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B3">
                            <label>3</label>
                            <article-title>Alexiadou Artemis &amp;amp; Lohndal Terje (2017). On the division of labor between roots and functional structure. In The Verbal Domain, Roberta D’alessandro, Irene Franco, &amp;amp; Ángel Gallego (eds.), 85–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B4">
                            <label>4</label>
                            <article-title>Alexiadou Artemis &amp;amp; Schäfer Florian (2010). On the syntax of episodic vs. dispositional ‑er nominals. In The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks, Artemis Alexiadou &amp;amp; Monika Rathert (eds.), 9–38. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B5">
                            <label>5</label>
                            <article-title>Alexiadou Artemis &amp;amp; Stavrou Melita (2011). Ethnic adjectives as pseudo-adjectives: A case study on syntax-morphology interactions and the structure of DP. Studia Linguistica 65(2), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2011.01179.x.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B6">
                            <label>6</label>
                            <article-title>Anagnostopoulou Elena (2003). Participles and voice. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert, &amp;amp; Arnim Von Stechow (eds.), 1–36. Berlin: De Gruyter.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B7">
                            <label>7</label>
                            <article-title>Arad Maya (2003). Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21, 737–778. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025533719905.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B8">
                            <label>8</label>
                            <article-title>Bloch-Trojnar Maria (2018). Are dispositional adjectives a case of transposition? Semantic effects of -liw(y) attachment to verbal bases in Polish. Studies in Polish Linguistics 13(2), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.18.004.8743.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B9">
                            <label>9</label>
                            <article-title>Bruening Benjamin (2014). Word-formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32(2), 363–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9227-y.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B10">
                            <label>10</label>
                            <article-title>Cetnarowska Bożena (2014). To maximize polysemy or homonymy? On analysing denominal adjectives in Polish and English. In Extension and its Limits, Grzegorz Drożdź &amp;amp; Andrzej Łyda (eds.), 60–79. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B11">
                            <label>11</label>
                            <article-title>Cetnarowska Bożena (2015). Categorial ambiguities within the noun phrase: Relational adjectives in Polish. In How Categorical Are Categories? New Approaches to the Old Questions of Noun, Verb, and Adjective, Joanna Błaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska, &amp;amp; Krzysztof Migdalski (eds.), 115–153. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B12">
                            <label>12</label>
                            <article-title>Cetnarowska Bożena (2016). Outbound anaphora, English compound nouns and Polish relational adjectives. Linguistica Silesiana 37, 91–104.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B13">
                            <label>13</label>
                            <article-title>Embick David (2003). Locality, listedness and morphological identity. Studia Linguistica 57(3), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0039-3193.2003.00102.x.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B14">
                            <label>14</label>
                            <article-title>Embick David (2004). On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3), 355–392. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402634.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B15">
                            <label>15</label>
                            <article-title>Embick David (2010). Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B16">
                            <label>16</label>
                            <article-title>Embick David (2023). Smaller syntax for English stative passives: A first report. Acta Linguistica Academica 70(3), 285–316. https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2023.00644.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B17">
                            <label>17</label>
                            <article-title>Fábregas Antonio (2007). The internal syntactic structure of relational adjectives. Probus 19, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/PROBUS.2007.001.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B18">
                            <label>18</label>
                            <article-title>Gehrke Berit (2011). Stative passives and event kinds. In Sinn und Bedeutung 15: Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Semantik, Ingo Reich, Eva Horch, &amp;amp; Dennis Pauly (eds.), 241–257. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B19">
                            <label>19</label>
                            <article-title>Grimshaw Jane (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B20">
                            <label>20</label>
                            <article-title>Harley Heidi (2005). One-replacement, unaccusativity, acategorial roots and Bare Phrase Structure. In Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 11, Slava Gorbachow &amp;amp; Andrew Nevins (eds.), 59–78. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B21">
                            <label>21</label>
                            <article-title>Harley Heidi (2009). The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization, Anastasia Giannakidou &amp;amp; Monika Rathert (eds.), 321–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B22">
                            <label>22</label>
                            <article-title>Harley Heidi (2014). On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3–4), 225–276. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0010.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B23">
                            <label>23</label>
                            <article-title>Harley Heidi &amp;amp; Haugen Jason (2007). Are there really two different classes of instrumental denominal verbs in English? Snippets 16, 9–10.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B24">
                            <label>24</label>
                            <article-title>Iordăchioaia Gianina (2020). D and N are different nominalizers. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1111.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B25">
                            <label>25</label>
                            <article-title>Kiparsky Paul (1983). Word formation and the lexicon. In 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers, Frances Ingemann (ed.), 3–32. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B26">
                            <label>26</label>
                            <article-title>Kiparsky Paul (1997). Remarks on denominal verbs. In Complex Predicates, Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan, &amp;amp; Peter Sells (eds.), 473–499. Stanford: The Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B27">
                            <label>27</label>
                            <article-title>Marantz, Alec (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2), 201–225.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B28">
                            <label>28</label>
                            <article-title>Marchis Moreno Mihaela (2018). Relational Adjectives in Romance and English. Oxford: Blackwell.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B29">
                            <label>29</label>
                            <article-title>Roy Isabelle &amp;amp; Soare Elena (2013). Event-related nominals. In Categorization and Category Change, Gianina Iordăchioaia, Isabelle Roy, &amp;amp; Kaori Takamine (eds.), 121–152. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B30">
                            <label>30</label>
                            <article-title>Ruda Marta (2021). Polish personal pronouns: [PersP Pers [NumP Num [n]]] and [NumP Num [n]]. Studies in Polish Linguistics 16, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.21.002.13956.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B31">
                            <label>31</label>
                            <article-title>Szymanek Bogdan (2010). A Panorama of Polish Word Formation. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B32">
                            <label>32</label>
                            <article-title>Wood Jim (2023). Icelandic Nominalizations and Allosemy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                </ref-list>
            </back>
</article>
