2543-6104 Wieloaspektowość problemu uzależnień kobiet I mężczyzn The multifaceted nature of the problem of addiction among women and men Czerwiec Karolina author Piątek Karolina author Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie Correspondence to: Karolina Czerwiec karolina.czerwiec@uken.krakow.pl Correspondence to: Karolina Piątek 31 03 2025 Nr 9/2024 2024 72 86 Copyright © 2025 2025 Eksperci nauk behawioralnych uważają, że wszystkie czynniki zdolne do stymulowania człowieka mogą uzależniać; a ilekroć nawyk zmienia się w obowiązek, można to uznać za uzależnienie. Uważają także, że istnieje zarówno wiele podobieństw, jak i różnic między objawami diagnostycznymi uzależnienia chemicznego i behawioralnego (Poikolainen, 2023). Coraz więcej dowodów sugeruje, że doświadczenia kobiet i mężczyzn w procesie zdrowienia również mogą się różnić. Wyjście z uzależnienia nie przebiega liniowo i jest procesem wieloczynnikowym i długotrwałym. Celem artykułu jest scharakteryzowanie różnych podejść do problemu uzależnienia i terapii kobiet i mężczyzn. 1 Abreu Minero V., Best D., Brown L. i in. (2022). Differences in addiction and recovery gains according to gender – gender barriers and specific differences in overall strengths growth. „Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy”, nr 17, 21. 2 Alavi S.S., Maracy M.R., Jannatifard F., Eslami M. (2011). The effect of psychiatric symptoms on the internet addiction disorder in Isfahan’s University students. „J Res Med Sci.”, Jun., nr 16(6), s. 793–800. 3 Alavi S.S., Ferdosi M., Jannatifard F., Eslami M., Alaghemandan H., Setare M. (2012). Behavioral Addiction versus Substance Addiction: Correspondence of Psychiatric and Psychological Views. „Int J Prev Med.”, Apr., nr 3(4), s. 290–294. 4 Andersson C., Wincup E., Best D., Irving J. (2021). Gender and recovery pathways in the UK. „Drugs Educ Prev Policy”, nr 28(5), s. 454–464. 5 Becker J.B. (2016). Sex differences in addiction. „Dialogues Clin Neurosci.”, Dec., nr 18(4), s. 395–402. 6 Becker J.B., McClellan M., Reed B.G. (2016). Sociocultural context for sex differences in addiction. „Addict Biol.”, Sep., nr 21(5), s. 1052–1059. 7 Best D., Edwards M. (2018). International experiences of life in recovery. „Alcohol Treat Q.”, nr36(4), s. 429–436. 8 Bezrutczyk D. (2024). The Differences In Addiction Between Men And Women. Addiction Center. 9 Collinson B., Hall L. (2021). The role of social mechanisms of change in women’s addiction recovery trajectories. „Drugs Educ Prev Policy.”, nr 28(5), s. 426–436. 10 Cornish J.L., Prasad A.A. (2021). Sex Differences in Substance Use Disorders: A Neurobiological Perspective. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health. 11 Cummings J.A., Jagannathan L., Jackson L.R., Becker J.B. (2014). Sex differences in the effects of estradiol in the nucleus accumbens and striatum on the response to cocaine: neurochemistry and behavior. „Drug Alcohol Depend.”, Feb., nr 135, s. 22–28. 12 Evans S.M. (2007). The role of estradiol and progesterone in modulating the subjective effects of stimulants in humans. „Exp Clin Psychopharmacol.”, Oct., nr 15(5), s. 418–426. 13 Grace S., Rossetti M.G., Allen N., Batalla A., Bellani M., Brambilla P. i in. (2021). Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of alcohol dependence: hippocampus and amygdala subregions in a sample of 966 people from the ENIGMA Addiction Working Group. „Transl Psychiatry”, nr 11, s. 156. 14 Kleinhans N.M., Sweigert J., Blake M., Douglass B., Doane B., Reitz F. i in. (2020). FMRI activation to cannabis odor cues is altered in individuals at risk for a cannabis use disorder. „Brain Behav.”, nr 10, s. e01764. 15 Kogachi S., Chang L., Alicata D., Cunningham E., Ernst T. (2017). Sex differences in impulsivity and brain morphometry in methamphetamine users. „Brain Struct Funct.”, nr 222, s. 215–227. 16 Lim T.V., Ersche K. (2023). Theory-driven computational models of drug addiction in humans: Fruitful or futile?, „Addiction Neuroscience”, nr 5, s. 100066. 17 Lind K.E., Gutierrez E.J., Yamamoto D.J., Regner M.F., McKee S.A., Tanabe J. (2017). Sex disparities in substance abuse research: evaluating 23 years of structural neuroimaging studies. „Drug Alcohol Depend.”, nr 173, s. 92–98. 18 Moeller S.J., Tomasi D., Honorio J., Volkow N.D., Goldstein R.Z. (2012). Dopaminergic involvement during mental fatigue in health and cocaine addiction. „Transl Psychiatry.”, Oct., 23, 2(10), s. e176. 19 Moningka H., Lichenstein S., Worhunsky P.D., DeVito E.E., Scheinost D., Yip S.W. (2019). Can neuroimaging help combat the opioid epidemic? A systematic review of clinical and pharmacological challenge fMRI studies with recommendations for future research. „Neuropsychopharmacology”, nr 44, s. 259–273. 20 NIDA, (2022), May 4. Sex and Gender Differences in Substance Use. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/research-reports/substance-use-in-women/sex-gender-differences-in-substance-use [dostęp: 12.05.2024]. 21 Phillips L. (2023). The Role of Education in Recovery, 3, 27. 22 Poikolainen K. (2023). A new paradigm for addictions. „Alcohol Alcohol.”, Sep., 9, nr 58(5), s. 512–514. 23 Rossetti M.G., Patalay P., Mackey S., Allen N.B., Batalla A., Bellani M. i in. (2021).Gender-related neuroanatomical differences in alcohol dependence: findings from the ENIGMA Addiction Working Group. „Neuroimage Clin.”, nr 30, s. 102636. 24 Schamp J., Simonis S., Roets G., Van Havere T., Gremeaux L., Vanderplasschen W. (2021). Women’s views on barriers and facilitators for seeking alcohol and drug treatment in Belgium. „Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs.”, nr 38(2), s. 175–189. 25 Shan Q., Ge M., Christie M.J., Balleine B.W. (2014). The acquisition of goal-directed actions generates opposing plasticity in direct and indirect pathways in dorsomedial striatum. „J Neurosci.”, Jul., 9, nr 34(28), s. 9196–9201. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0313-14.2014. 26 Staddon P. (2015). Women and alcohol: Social perspectives. W: Policy Press. 27 Tweed E., Miller R., Matheson C.I. (2018). Why are drug-related deaths among women increasing in Scotland? A scoping of possible explanations. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research. 28 Topiwala A., Allan C.L., Valkanova V., Zsoldos E., Filippini N., Sexton C. i in. (2017). Moderate alcohol consumption as risk factor for adverse brain outcomes and cognitive decline: longitudinal cohort study. „BMJ”, nr 357, s. j2353. 29 Van Steenberghe T., Vanderplasschen W., Bellaert L., De Maeyer J. (2021). Photovoicing interconnected sources of recovery capital of women with a drug use history. „Drugs Educ Prev Policy.”, nr 28(5), s. 411–425. 30 Volkow N. (2020). How Science Has Revolutionized the Understanding of Drug Addiction. National Institute on Drug Abuse, USA. 31 Wen X., Du Z., Wang Z., Xu Y., Wang K., Yu D., Liu J., Yuan K. (2023). Medicine-engineering interdisciplinary researches for addiction: Opportunities and challenges. „Meta-Radiology”, 1, 2. 32 White W.L. (2007). Addiction recovery: Its definition and conceptual boundaries. „J Subst Abus Treat.”, nr 33(3), s. 229–241. 33 Young K.S. (2007). Cognitive behavior therapy with Internet addicts: treatment outcomes and implications. „Cyberpsychol Behav.”, Oct., nr 10(5), s. 671–679.