@article{bac72c2f-58bc-439c-91af-628dedb417f7,
author = {Maria  Flis},
title = {Does psychology require a concept of human nature?},
journal = {Developmental Psychology},
volume = {2012},
number = {Volume 17, Issue 1},
year = {2012},
issn = {1895-6297},
pages = {31-38},keywords = {action; culture; evolution; human nature; metaphysics; mind; myth; rationality; thinking},
abstract = {Does psychology require a concept of human nature?
	The primary thesis of this article is in accord with the postulate that notions about mankind are rooted in the concept of human nature. From the perspective of the history of ideas, it is clearly evident that the essence of the human being is intertwined with history while the influence of this intrinsic understanding of man has been and continues to exceed that of history. The strongest evidence of this is found in the philosophy of the human individual constantly present in the psychological discourse despite the intervening, temporary dominance of the empirical paradigm. The belief that everything can be measured and counted stems from mythical thought. This text undertakes an attempt to categorize the conceptual apparatus of contemporary cognitive science. Concurrently, it indicates the definitions and relationships which encompass such concepts as the mind, consciousness, and thinking.},
doi = {10.4467/20843879PR.12.002.0377},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/en/journal/psychologia-rozwojowa/article/czy-psychologia-potrzebuje-koncepcji-ludzkiej-natury}
}