Astington J. et al. (eds.) 1988. Developing theories of mind. Cambridge, New York.
Barsalou L. 1987. The instability of graded structure in concepts. – Neisser B. (ed.) Concepts and conceptual development. Cambridge, New York: 101–140. 
Barsalou L. 1993. Flexibility, structure and linguistic vagary in concepts. – Collins A. et al. (eds.) Theories of memory. Hove: 29–101. 
Carston R. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford. 
Fauconnier G., Turner M. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York. 
Fauconnier G., Turner M. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. – Gibbs R. (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: 53–66. 
Gibbs R. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge.
Gibbs R. 1998. The fight over metaphor in thought and language. – Katz N. et al. (eds.) Figurative language and thought. New York, Oxford: 88–118. 
Gibbs R., Tendahl M. 2006. Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. – Mind & Language 21: 379–403. 
Glucksberg S. 2001. Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford. 
Grady J.E. 1997. Theories are buildings revisited. – Cognitive Linguistics 8: 267–290. 
Hampe B. 2005. On the role of iconic motivation in conceptual metaphor: Has metaphor theory come full circle? – Maeder C. et al. (eds.) Outside in, inside-out. Iconicity in language and literature. [vol. 4]. Amsterdam: 39–66. 
Higashimori I. 2002. Metaphor understanding in relevance theory: From loan concept metaphor to time is space metaphor. – Translation and Meaning [Part 6]. 
Lakoff G., Johnson M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago. [2nd edition 2003]. 
Lasersohn P. 1999. Pragmatic halos. – Language 75: 522–551. 
Liszkowski U. et al. 2008. Twelve-month-olds communicate helpfully and appropriately for knowledgeable and ignorant partners. – Cognition 108: 732–739. 
McGlone M. 2001. Concepts as metaphors. – Glucksberg S. Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: 90–115. 
Matsui T. et al. 2006. On the role of language in children’s early understanding of others as epistemic beings. – Cognitive Development 21: 158–173. 
Matsui T. et al. 2009. Understanding of speaker certainty and false-belief reasoning: A comparison of Japanese and German preschoolers. – Developmental Science 12: 602–13.
Müller C. 2008. Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago. 
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez F., Perez Hernandez L. 2003. Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication. – Panther K.-U., Thornburg L. (eds.) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam: 23–49. 
Sodian B. 2004. Theory of mind: The case for conceptual development. – Schneider W. et al. (eds.) Young children’s cognitive development. London: 95–130. 
Southgate V. et al. 2007. Infant pointing: Communication to cooperate or communication to learn? – Child Development 78: 735–740. 
Southgate V. et al. 2009. Sensitivity to communicative relevance tells young children what to imitate. – Developmental Science: 1013–1019. 
Sperber D., Wilson D. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. [2nd edition]. Oxford. 
Sperber D., Wilson D. 1998. The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. – Carruthers P., Boucher J. (eds.) Language and thought. Cambridge: 184–200. 
Sperber D., Wilson D. 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. – Mind & Language 17: 3–23. 
Sperber D., Wilson D. 2008. A deflationary account of metaphors. – Gibbs R. (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: 84–105. 
Tendahl M., Gibbs R. 2008. Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. – Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1823–1864.
Vega Moreno R. 2007. Creativity and convention: The pragmatics of everyday figurative speech. Amsterdam.
Wellman H. et al. 2001. Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief. – Child Development 72: 655–684. 
Wilson D. 2009. Irony and metarepresentation. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 183–226.
Wilson D. [forthcoming]. Pragmatic processes and metarepresentational abilities: The case of verbal irony. – Matsui T. (ed.) Pragmatics and theory of mind. Amsterdam. 
Wilson D., Carston R. 2007. A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. – Burton-Roberts R. (ed.) Pragmatics. Basingstoke: 230–259. 
Wilson D., Carston R. 2008. Metaphor and the ‘Emergent Property’ problem: A relevancetheoretic approach. – The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3 (2007). Online: http://www.thebalticyearbook.org/. 
Wilson D., Sperber D. 2002. Truthfulness and relevance. – Mind 111: 583–632. 
Wilson D., Sperber D. 2004. Relevance theory. – Horn L., Ward G. (eds.) The Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: 607–632.