TY - JOUR
TI - An inquiry into the use and meaning of the forms ἔθηκε(ν) and θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad: Syntax and semantics
AU - De Decker, Filip
TI - An inquiry into the use and meaning of the forms ἔθηκε(ν) and θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad: Syntax and semantics
AB - 
	In this article, I discuss the use and absence of the augment in the 3rd singular forms ἔθηκε(ν) and θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad. In the previous article (De Decker 2020), I explained why I chose this corpus and determined the value of the different forms. Here I proceed to the actual analysis of the forms: do they confirm the previous syntactic and semantic observations that have been made for the use and absence of the augment (the clitic rule by Drewitt and Beck, the reduction rule by Kiparsky and the distinctions: speech versus narrative, foreground versus background and remote versus recent past)?
VL - 2020
IS - Volume 137, Issue 2
PY - 2020
SN - 1897-1059
C1 - 2083-4624
SP - 135
EP - 155
DO - 10.4467/20834624SL.20.011.12443
UR - https://ejournals.eu/en/journal/studia-linguistica-uic/article/an-inquiry-into-the-use-and-meaning-of-the-forms-etheke-n-and-theke-n-in-the-iliad-syntax-and-semantics
KW - augment
KW - Homeric Greek morpho-syntax
KW - injunctive
KW - textual criticism