@article{01936daa-87f0-73dd-bb95-082caa2cc05c,
author = {Marcin Laberschek},
title = {Ars, Ratio et Sensibilitas},
journal = {Culture Management},
volume = {2024},
number = {Volume 25, Issue 1–2},
year = {2024},
issn = {1896-8201},
pages = {341-349},keywords = {sensitivity in management; ethical sensitivity; morality in management; humanistic
management},
abstract = {The subject matter of the article is in line with the humanistic perspective of management and deals with management as an area of knowledge, the teaching of management in academic centres, and management as a human activity. The aim is to find an answer to the question of whether there is still a place for humanistic management – that is – a management in which human values are at least as important as material ones, in a world in which measurable results count, in which goals determine the means of achieving them, and if so, what such management should be distinguished by. Following the idea contained in Emil Orzechowski’s paper Arte et Ratione, the author indicates that such management is possible, while at the same time broadening this concept with the element of sensitivity (sensibilitas), or more precisely, ethical sensitivity. After all, management without human sensitivity is a mere tool for making profits regardless of the cost.},
doi = {10.4467/20843976ZK.24.028.20146},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/en/journal/zarzadzanie-w-kulturze/article/ars-ratio-et-sensibilitas}
}