Alramadan M.M. 2016. Appraisal in English and Arabic academic discourse: A contrastive study within a systemic functional perspective. [unpublished PhD dissertation, King Saud University].
Arnaudet M.L., Barrett M.E. 1984. Approaches to academic reading and writing. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
Atkinson D. 1998. Integrating multiple analyses in historical studies of scientific discourse: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. – Battalio J.T. (ed.). Essays in the study of scientific discourse: Methods, practice, and pedagogy. Stamford (CT) London: Ablex: 139–165.
Bamford J. 2005. Subjective or objective evaluation? Prediction in academic lectures. – Tognini-Bonelli E., Del Lungo Camiciotti G. (eds.). Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 17–29.
Berger P.L., Luckmann T. 1966/1967. The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
Biber D. 2006. Stance in spoken and written university registers. – Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 97–116.
Biber D., Finegan E. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. – Discourse Processes 11: 1–34.
Bralczyk J. 1978. O leksykalnych wyznacznikach prawdziwościowej oceny sądów. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Burgess S., Martín-Martín P. (eds.). 2008. English as an additional language in research publication and communication. Bern: Peter Lang.
Coates J. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
Conrad S., Biber D. 2000. Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. – Hunston S., Thompson G. (eds.). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 56–73.
Crompton P. 1997. Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems. – English for Specific Purposes 16.4: 271–287.
Crosthwaite P., Cheung L., Jiang F. 2017. Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. – English for Specific Purposes 46: 107–123.
Diani G. 2009. Reporting and evaluation in English book review articles: A cross-disciplinary study. – Hyland K., Diani G. (eds.). Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan: 87–104.
Dontcheva-Navratilova O. 2018. Intercultural and interdisciplinary variation in the use of epistemic lexical verbs in linguistics and economics research articles. – Linguistica Pragensia 28.2: 154–167.
Dudley-Evans T. 1994. Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. – Coulthard M. (ed.). Advances in written text analysis. London, New York: Routledge: 219–228.
Fortanet I. 2008. Evaluative language in peer review referee reports. – Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 27–37.
Freddi M. 2005. From corpus to register: The construction of evaluation and argumentation in linguistics textbooks. – Tognini-Bonelli E., Del Lungo Camiciotti G. (eds.). Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 133–151.
Gavins J. 2005. (Re)thinking modality: A text-world perspective. – Journal of Literary Semantics 34: 79–93.
Gilbert G.N., Mulkay M. 1984. Opening Pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gries S. 2013. Statistics for linguistics with R. [2nd ed.]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Grzegorczykowa R. 1996/1998. Wykłady z polskiej składni. [3rd ed.]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Grzegorczykowa R. 2001. Wprowadzenie do semantyki językoznawczej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Halliday M.A.K. 1985/1994. Functional grammar. [2nd ed.]. London: Arnold.
Hewings M., Thaine C. 2012. Cambridge academic English: An integrated skills course for EAP. Advanced. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hinkel E. 2002. Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hood S. 2010. Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hopkins A., Dudley-Evans T. 1988. A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. – English for Specific Purposes 7: 113–121.
Hoye L. 1997. Adverbs and modality in English. London, New York: Longman.
Hunston S., Thompson G. (eds.). 2000. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland K. 1999. Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. – Candlin C.N., Hyland K. (eds.). Writing: Texts, processes and practices. London, New York: Longman: 99–121.
Hyland K. 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. – Discourse Studies 7.2: 173–192.
Hyland K., Milton J. 1997. Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. – Journal of Second Language Writing 6.2: 183–205.
Kashiha H. 2015. Recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers. – 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies 21.1: 47–59.
Kim C., Crosthwaite P. 2019. Disciplinary differences in the use of evaluative that: Expression of stance via that-clauses in business and medicine. – Journal of English for Academic Purposes 41: 100775.
Krzyżyk D. 2008. Synonimia pojęć prawdziwościowych – teoria i nauczanie. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Ligara B. 1997. Polskie czasowniki modalne i ich francuskie ekwiwalenty tłumaczeniowe. Kraków: Universitas.
Łyda A., Warchał K. (eds.). 2014. Occupying niches: Interculturality, cross-culturality and aculturality in academic research. Cham: Springer.
Martin J.R. 2000. Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. – Hunston S., Thompson G. (eds.). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 142–175.
Martin J.R., White P.R.R. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mur-Dueñas P., Šinkūnienė J. (eds.). 2018. Intercultural perspectives on research writing. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Myers G., Lampropoulou S. 2012. Impersonal you and stance-taking in social research interviews. – Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1206–1218.
Palmer F.R. 1979. Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.
Palmer F.R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pérez-Llantada C. 2010. The “dialectics of change” as a facet of globalisation: Epistemic modality in academic writing. – Ruiz-Garrido M.F., Palmer-Silveira J.C., Fortanet-Gómez I. (eds.). English for professional and academic purposes. Amsterdam: Rodopi: 25–41.
Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rezzano N.S. 2004. Modality and modal responsibility in research articles in English. – Facchinetti R., Palmer F. (eds.). English modality in perspective: Genre analysis and contrastive studies. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang: 101–118.
Römer U. 2005. “This seems somewhat counterintuitive, though…” Negative evaluation in linguistics book reviews by male and female authors. – Tognini-Bonelli E., Del Lungo Camiciotti G. (eds.). Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 97–115.
Rytel D. 1982. Leksykalne środki wyrażania modalności w języku czeskim i polskim. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Scott M. 2008. WordSmith Tools 5.0 for Windows. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software. Simpson P. 1993. Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge.
Stępień B. 2016. Zasady pisania tekstów naukowych. Prace doktorskie i artykuły. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Suomela-Salmi E., Dervin F. (eds.). 2009. Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives on academic discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Swales J.M. 1981. Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham: The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.
Swales J.M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales J.M. 2001. EAP-related linguistic research: An intellectual history. – Flowerdew J., Peacock M. (eds.). Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 42–54.
Swales J.M., Feak C.B. 2012. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. [3rd ed.]. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Tutak K. 2003. Leksykalne nieczasownikowe wykładniki modalności epistemicznej w autobiografiach. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.
Vold E.T. 2006. Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and crossdisciplinary study. – International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16.1: 61–87.
Wallace M., Wray A. 2016. Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. [3rd ed.]. Los Angeles, London: Sage.
Warchał K. 2015. Certainty and doubt in academic discourse: Epistemic modality markers in English and Polish linguistics articles. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Westney P. 1995. Modals and periphrasics in English: An investigation into the semantic correspondence between certain English modal verbs and their periphrastic equivalents. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Wu B., Paltridge B. 2021. Stance expressions in academic writing: A corpus-based comparison of Chinese students’ MA dissertations and PhD theses. – Lingua 253: 103071.
Yang R., Allison D. 2003. Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. – English for Specific Purposes 22: 365–385.
Zamani G., Ebadia S. 2016. Move analysis of conclusions as components of research articles in Persian and English. – Cypriot Journal of Educational Science 11.1: 9–20.
Zaśko-Zielińska M., Majewska-Tworek A., Piekot T. 2008. Sztuka pisania. Przewodnik po tekstach użytkowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Żabowska M. 2006. Zróżnicowanie semantyczne partykuł epistemicznych. – LingVaria 1.1: 203–213.
Żydek-Bednarczuk U. 2014. Polski język naukowy wczoraj i dzisiaj. – Transformacje 1–2 (80– 81): 207–219.