@article{018e9e37-85dd-7173-9fa9-27dc7ffbf5b6,
author = {Józef  Wołczański},
title = {The correspondence of Rev. Dr Jan Kwolek and Rev. Prof. Jan Fijałek between 1919 and 1936 (part 2)},
journal = {Rocznik Przemyski. Historia},
volume = {2022},
number = {1 (27) 2022},
year = {2022},
issn = {2449-7347},
pages = {215-402},keywords = {Rev. Prof. Jan Fijałek; Rev. Dr Jan Kwolek; Archbishop Adam Stefan Sapieha; Bishop Józef Sebastian Pelczar; Bishop Anatol Nowak; Bishop Franciszek Barda; Bishop Karol Józef Fischer; Rev. Stefan Momidłowski; Rev. Kazimierz Wais; Prof. Stanisław Kot; Prof. Władysław Abraham; Prof. Władysław Semkowicz; Prof. Stanisław Zakrzewski; Dr Kazimierz Kaczmarczyk; Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences; Diocesan Archive},
abstract = {The second part of the correspondence between Rev. Dr Jan Kwolek (Przemyśl) and Rev. Prof. Jan Fijałek (Kraków) presented here covers eight years: 1928-1936. As for the former priest it was the prime of his spiritual, intellectual and organizational development, whereas the latter was approaching the end of his life, enjoying deserved renown in the field of historical research; he died in 1936.
No wonder then that the subject matter of the letters – in vast majority authored by the Przemyśl priest – was largely an account of his successive achievements, in particular in the field of modern organization of the Diocesan Archive which he headed, requests for academic consultations about the formation of a reference library, and discussions on current academic work. Rev. Jan Kwolek would regularly write to his correspondent about concentrating the records from the parish churches of the whole Przemyśl diocese, systematically deposited in Przemyśl. He also used to tell him about the positive reception of his work all over Poland, he shared his joy about significant interest among local theology students in archive work, he did not hide his concern for the fate of the Diocesan Archive due to lack of a successor; finally, he would inform Rev. Fijałek about current events in the local church: changes in managerial positions, deficiencies of the personal policy and his own successive promotions. On the other hand, Rev. Fijałek would spontaneously respond to his younger colleague’s requests, not so much instructing him on the matters of organizing the archive, as that was something Rev. Kwolek managed perfectly well, as indicating the titles of academic books indispensable in an archive library. He did not spare words of praise, which must have been an incentive for the younger priest to keep up the good work.
The correspondence makes the reader admire the enormous achievements of one person in the field of establishing in the interwar Przemyśl a second modern research and academic institution (after the Archdiocesan Archive) accessible to historians dealing with matters of the church. The letters published here enhance the reader’s knowledge and awareness by so far unknown facts from the history of research under the aegis of Roman Catholic Church in the Second Republic of Poland.},
doi = {10.4467/24497347RPH.22.025.16650},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/en/journal/rocznik-przemyski-historia/article/korespondencja-ks-dra-jana-kwolka-z-ks-prof-janem-fijalkiem-za-lata-1919-1936-czesc-2}
}