FAQ

Organon

The Construction of a Prehistory for the World Beyond Europe: Introduction to the File: Prehistory in the Tropics

Publication date: 14.12.2022

ORGANON, 2022, Volume 54, pp. 1 - 1

https://doi.org/10.4467/00786500.ORG.22.003.16953

Authors

,
Arnaud Hurel
Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, UMR 7194, 1 rue René Panhard, 75013 Paris, France
All publications →
Maddalena Cataldi
The Centre Alexandre-Koyré
All publications →

Abstract

From the second half of the 19th century, prehistory developed, both theoretically and in the field, according to a European model. Concepts and vocabulary, but also collections and European sites, were established as axioms. This construction of prehistory took place during the expansion of ethnographic missions and colonial empires. This European prehistory with universal ambitions had to take into account an otherness, current and embodied by the savage, which had become an object of study for the emerging human sciences. From a historiographical point of view, many relationships remain to be clarified with regard to the interactions between European prehistory and the construction of a prehistory beyond Europe.

References

Blanckaert C., 1800 – Le moment «naturaliste» des sciences de l’homme in: Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 3, 2000, pp. 117–160.
Cataldi M., Comparatisme ethnographique et datation de l’art rupestre (1860–1880) in: L’avant et l’ailleurs. Comparatisme, ethnologie et préhistoire, (éd.) J.–L. Georget, P. Grosos & R. Kuba, Le Cerf, Paris 2020, pp. 19–36.
Coye N., La Préhistoire en parole et en acte, méthodes et enjeux de la pratique archéologique, L’Harmattan, Paris 1997.
Di Brizio M. B., Histoire du concept de couvade: Edward Burnett Tylor et l’ethnologie victorienne, L’Harmattan, Paris 2021.
Drieënhuizen C. & Fenneke S., Java Man and the Politics of Natural History: An Object Biography in: Bijdragen Tot de Taal–, Land– En Volkenkunde 177, 2–3/2021, pp. 290–311.
Gillespie N. C., The Duke of Argyll, Evolutionary Anthropology, and the Art of Scientific Controversy in: Isis 68, 1/1977, pp. 40–54.
Laming–Emperaire A., La signification de l’art rupestre paléolithique. Méthodes et applications, Picard, Paris 1962.
Manias M., The problematic construction of ‘Palaeolithic Man’: The Old Stone Age and the difficulties of the comparative method, 1859–1914 in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 51, 2015, pp. 32–43.
Mortillet G. de, Promenades préhistoriques à l’exposition universelle in: Matériaux pour l’histoire positive et philosophique de l’homme 7–8, 1867, pp. 181–368.
Schlanger N. & Taylor A.–C., Archéologie et anthropologie: chemins parcourus et engagements partagés in: La préhistoire des autres. Perspectives archéologiques et anthropologiques, (éd.) N. Schlanger & A.–C. Taylor, La Découverte, Paris 2012, pp. 11–28.
Stocking G. W., Victorian Anthropology, The Free Press, New York 1987.
Trautmann T., The Revolution in Ethnological Time in: Man 27, 2/1992, pp. 379–397.
Trigger B., Alternative Archaeologies: Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist in: Man 19, 3/1984, pp. 355–370.
Trigger B. & Glover I., Editorial in: World Archaeology 13, 2/1981, pp. 133–137.

Information

Information: ORGANON, 2022, pp. 1 - 1

Article type: Original research article

Titles:

Polish:

La construction de la préhistoire hors d’Europe: Introduction au dossier Préhistoire sous les tropiques

Authors

Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, UMR 7194, 1 rue René Panhard, 75013 Paris, France

The Centre Alexandre-Koyré

Published at: 14.12.2022

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND  licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Arnaud Hurel (Author) - 50%
Maddalena Cataldi (Author) - 50%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

French

View count: 752

Number of downloads: 338