<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en"
    xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <processing-meta tagset-family="jats" base-tagset="publishing" mathml-version="2.0" table-model="xhtml"/>
    <front>
                        
                        <journal-meta>
            <issn>1897-1059</issn>
                                </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <title-group>
                                    <article-title>On Mańczak’s frequency and analogy</article-title>
                            </title-group>

                        <contrib-group>
                                                            <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
                            <name>
                                <surname>Stachowski</surname>
                                <given-names>Marek</given-names>
                            </name>
                            <role>author</role>
                                                                                                                                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
                                                                                        <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-1"/>
                        </contrib>
                                                </contrib-group>

                                                                                        <aff id="aff-1">
                    <institution-wrap>
                        <institution>Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie</institution>
                                                    <institution-id institution-id-type="ROR">03bqmcz70</institution-id>
                                            </institution-wrap>
                </aff>
                            
            <author-notes>
                                    <corresp id="cor-1">Correspondence to: Marek Stachowski <email>marek.stachowski@uj.edu.pl</email></corresp>
                            </author-notes>

                            <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2014-06-30">
                    <day>30</day>
                    <month>06</month>
                    <year>2014</year>
                </pub-date>
            
            <volume>Volume 131, Issue 2</volume>
            <issue>2014</issue>
                        <fpage>213</fpage>
                                    <lpage>220</lpage>
            
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2014</copyright-statement>
                                    <copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
                            </permissions>

            <funding-group specific-use="Crossref">
                <funding-statement></funding-statement>
            </funding-group>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        &lt;p&gt;Witold Mańczak’s oeuvre comprises various topics of historical linguistics. This article attempts to explain why some aspects of his theory are hardly accepted, yet his work still deserves interest and serious discussion.&lt;/p&gt;
    </body>
    <back>
                    <ref-list>
                                                                                <ref id="B1">
                            <label>1</label>
                            <article-title>Bammesberger A. 2005. Zur Polysemie von dt. Akt. – Sprachwissenschaft 30: 77–81.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B2">
                            <label>2</label>
                            <article-title>Best K.-H. 1973. Probleme der Analogieforschung. München.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B3">
                            <label>3</label>
                            <article-title>Kluge F. 1989. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. [Seebold E. (ed.), 22nd edition]. Berlin.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B4">
                            <label>4</label>
                            <article-title>Kluge F. 2011. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. [Seebold E. (ed.), 25th edition]. Berlin.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B5">
                            <label>5</label>
                            <article-title>Mańczak W. 1982. Der Ursprung von dt. Akt ‘nu’. – Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 219: 373.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B6">
                            <label>6</label>
                            <article-title>Mańczak W. 1983. Polska fonetyka i morfologia historyczna. Warszawa.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B7">
                            <label>7</label>
                            <article-title>Mańczak W. 1997. Étymologie de l’allemand Akt ‘nu’. – Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 2: 173.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B8">
                            <label>8</label>
                            <article-title>Mańczak W. 1998. Irrégularités du pronom yakoute tuox ‘quoi’. – Folia Orientalia 34: 105–111.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B9">
                            <label>9</label>
                            <article-title>Mańczak W. 2001. Etyczny aspekt badań nad etnogenezą Słowian. – Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 57: 67–75.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B10">
                            <label>10</label>
                            <article-title>Mańczak W. 2009. 50-lecie nieregularnego rozwoju fonetycznego spowodowanego frek­wencją. – Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 65: 237–246.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B11">
                            <label>11</label>
                            <article-title>Mańczak W. 2010. Irregular sound change due to frequency in Germanic languages. – Lingua Posnaniensia 52.1: 55–65.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B12">
                            <label>12</label>
                            <article-title>Mańczak W. 2012. Czy koniec zmowy milczenia wokół teorii nieregularnego rozwoju fonetycznego spowodowanego frekwencją? – Academic Journal of Modern Philology 1: 75–83.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B13">
                            <label>13</label>
                            <article-title>Mithun M. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B14">
                            <label>14</label>
                            <article-title>Paul H. 1898. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle a. S.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B15">
                            <label>15</label>
                            <article-title>Seuntjens W. 2012: Why ‘Akt’ and why not ‘Nackt’? – Journal of Unsolved Questions. [on Internet: http://junq.info/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/06/JUnQ_AktNackt.pdf]: 4–6.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B16">
                            <label>16</label>
                            <article-title>Stachowski M. 1990. Der Lautwandel in der Deklination des jakutischen Interrogativ­pronomens tuox? ‘was?’. – Zeszyty Naukowe UJ. Prace Językoznawcze 101: 115–120.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B17">
                            <label>17</label>
                            <article-title>Stachowski M. 1993. Geschichte des jakutischen Vokalismus. Kraków.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                                                                    <ref id="B18">
                            <label>18</label>
                            <article-title>Urbańczyk P. (ed.). 2006. Nie-Słowianie o początkach Słowian. Poznań, Warszawa.</article-title>
                        </ref>
                                                </ref-list>
            </back>
</article>
