Jagiellonian University in Kraków
The concept of methodology for communication and knowledge management in the organizations
Zając
Radosław
author
Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Management
Correspondence to: Radosław Zając
19
12
2016
Issue 4 (2016)
Volume 2
299
314
Copyright © 2016
2016
<div id="cke_pastebin">The article analyses selected arguments for a universal methodology for managing communication and knowledge in organizations. On the basis of those conditions the principles of knowledge management are presented. Axioms underlying the logic model consistent with methodology is accompanied by a logic diagram of the other three components: the themes, processes and maintenance.</div>
<div id="cke_pastebin">The postulated methodology of communication and knowledge management in organizations aims to provide a universal, cost-effective and efficient tool to support the daily operations of the company, change management and implementation of strategic objectives. At the same time implementation of the principles of this methodology may allow for an increase in commitment and enhanced performance of potential users of communication processes and knowledge management – by making users prosumers.</div>
[
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D.E. (1999). Knowledge management systems: Issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the AIS, 1(2), 1–36.
]
[
Beer, M., Finnstrom, M., & Schrader, D. (2016). The great training robbery. Harvard Business School Research Paper Series, 16–121.
]
[
Bugdol, M., & Jedynak, P. (2015). Quality in the selected management concepts. Jagiellonian Journal of Management, 1(2), 91–103.
]
[
Chalmeta, R., & Grangel, R. (2008). Methodology for the implementation of knowledge management systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 742–755.
]
[
Danto, A.C. (1964). The Artworld. Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), 571–584.
]
[
Dave Snowden’s 7 Principles of Knowledge Management (2009), retrieved from: http://www.gurteen.com/gurteen/gurteen.nsf/id/km-seven-principles [accessed: 16.09.2016].
]
[
du Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 20–29.
]
[
Goldhaber, G.M. (1993). Organizational Communication. Madison: Brown & Benchmark.
]
[
Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1995). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Performance Measurement, Management, and Appraisal Sourcebook, 66, 17511.
]
[
Kirkpatrick, D.L., & Kirkpatrick, J.D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
]
[
Langefors, B. (1980). Infological models and information user views. Information Systems, 5(1), 17–32.
]
[
Morgan, G. (1997). Obrazy organizacji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
]
[
Mostowski, A. (1948). Logika matematyczna. Warszawa–Wrocław: Instytut Matematyczny Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
]
[
Office of Government Commerce (2009). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. The Stationery Office.
]
[
Ollivier, B. (2010). Nauki o komunikacji. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
]
[
Pathirage, C.P., Amaratunga, R.D.G., & Haigh, R.P. (2004). Knowledge Management and Organisational Performance: A Literature Review. Research Institute for Built and Human Environment, University of Salford, Salford M7 1NU, retrieved from: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/9960/1/knowledge_management.pdf [accessed: 16.09.2016].
]
[
Rubenstein-Montano, B., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., McCaw, D., Newman, B., Rebeck, K., & Team, T.K.M.M. (2001). A systems thinking framework for knowledge management. Decision Support Systems, 31(1), 5–16.
]
[
Schreiber, G. (2000). Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
]
[
Shani, A.B., Sena, J.A., & Olin, T. (2003). Knowledge management and new product development: A study of two companies. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(3), 137–149.
]
[
Shannon, C.E. (2001). A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 5(1), 3–55.
]
[
Shelley, A. (2015). Active Learning Innovations in Knowledge Management Education Generate Higher Quality Learning Outcomes, retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2578654 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2578654 [accessed: 16.09.2016].
]
[
Sundgren, B. (1973). An Infological Approach to Data Bases. Stockholm: Skriftserie Statistika Centralbyran.
]
[
Sure, Y., Staab, S., & Studer, R. (2004). On-to-knowledge methodology (OTKM). In Handbook on Ontologies. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 117–132.
]
[
Szul, E. (2013). Prosumpcja jako aktywność współczesnych konsumentów – uwarunkowania i przejawy. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, (31), 347–358.
]
[
Szychta, A. (2004). Rachunek kosztów działań i system kosztów docelowych jako instrumenty strategicznej rachunkowości zarządczej w warunkach globalizacji. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 18(74), 133–157.
]
[
Taylor, S., Lacy, S., & MacFarlane, I. (2007). ITIL: Service Transition. Published by TSO (The Stationery Office).
]
[
Zuber, R. (2012). Innovation and Knowledge Management. Select Theoretical and Practical Issues. Warszawa: Difin.
]
[
Żmigrodzki, M. (2006). Metodyka zarządzania wiedzą. E-mentor, (1/13), 53–56, retrieved from: http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/13/id/247 [accessed: 16.09.2016].
]