1897-1059
Studies in tense, aspect and augment use: An unrecognized (?) timeless injunctive in Early Epic Greek. Part 2: Actual analysis
De Decker
Filip
author
Università degli Studi di Verona
039bp8j42
The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Poland
Correspondence to: Filip De Decker filipdedecker9@gmail.com
23
08
2024
Volume 141, Issue 3
2024
161
184
Copyright © 2024
2024
<div>Since West’s seminal 1898 article, it has been assumed that there were (only) four instances in epic Greek (Homer, Hesiod and the Homeric Hymns) in which the injunctive (often called an unaugmented indicative in the commentaries) could be interpreted as having a timeless (or omnitemporal) meaning. In the second part of the article, I will argue and show that there could be more of these injunctive forms than West originally argued for. I will also analyze several other instances in which an injunctive has been transmitted, instances in which it refers to a background action or an event in a remote past, and argue that some injunctive forms indeed describe the timeless habits of the gods, while others are not timeless, but refer to actions in a remote or even mythical past, or describe background actions; moreover, even some indicative present forms could conceal older timeless injunctive forms (without arguing that the indicative forms should be altered, however). In all these instances I will also investigate and describe the aspectual stems, as well as show that their use can be explained by the distinction perfective – imperfective, which agrees with what we would find in Attic Greek and is not controlled by the metre.</div>
[
Ahrens H.L. 1843. De Linguae Graecae Dialectis. Liber Secundus. De dialecto dorica. Allen T., Sikes E. 1904. The Homeric hymns. London: MacMillan.
]
[
Avery J. 1885. The unaugmented verb forms of the Rig and Atharva Vedas. – Journal of the American Oriental Society 11: 326–365.
]
[
Bakker E. 2002. Remembering the God’s arrival. – Arethusa 35: 63–81.
]
[
Baumeister A. 1860. Hymni Homerici. Recensuit, apparatum criticum collegit, annotationem cum suam tum selectam variorum subiunxit Augustus Baumeister. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
]
[
Brügger C. 2018. Homer Iliad. The Basel commentary. Book XVI. [Transl. by B.W. Millis and S. Strack. Ed. by S.D. Olson]. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. Càssola F. 1975. Inni Omerici. Firenze: Mondadori.
]
[
Clackson J. 2007. Indo-European linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]
[
Chantraine P. 1948. Grammaire homérique. Vol. 1: Phonétique et morphologie. Paris: Klincksieck.
]
[
Chantraine P. 1953. Grammaire homérique. Vol. 1 : Syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.
]
[
Chicago Homer [available at: https://homer.library.northwestern.edu/html/application.html, accessed: 30 January 2023]
]
[
Curtius G. 1869. Zur Bildung des griechischen Nominativ Singularis. – (Curtius’) Studien zur griechischen und lateinischen Grammatik 2: 159–175.
]
[
De Decker F. 2015. A morphosyntactic analysis of speech introductions and conclusions in Homer. [unpublished PhD dissertation, LMU München]. [available at: https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17995/].
]
[
De Decker F. 2016. A contrastive analysis of the Homeric and Hesiodic augment, with special focus on Hesiod. – International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Historical Reconstruction 13: 33–128.
]
[
De Decker F. 2017. Ὅμηρον ἐξ Ὁμήρου σαφηνίζειν: An analysis of the augment use in Iliad 1. – Journal of Indo-European Studies 47: 58–171.
]
[
De Decker F. 2018. The tense usage in the speech conclusions with past reference in Homer. – Journal of Indo-European Studies 46: 109–151.
]
[
De Decker F. 2019. Studies in Greek epic diction, metre and language: The augment use in The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite (HH 5). – International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Historical Reconstruction 16: 1–86.
]
[
De Decker F. 2020. A semantic-pragmatic analysis of the augment in epic Greek, applied to some longer passages. – Leiwo M., Vierros M., Dahlgren S. (eds.). Papers on Ancient Greek linguistics. Proceedings of the ninth international colloquium on Ancient Greek linguistics (ICAGL 9). 30 August – 1 September 2018. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica: 447–477.
]
[
De Decker F. 2022. Studies in Homeric speech introductions and conclusions: Tense, aspect, augment, mood, modality, and modal particle. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’ Orso.
]
[
De Decker F. 2023. A contrastive study of the co-occurrence of the augmented, unaugmented and iterative forms in -σκin Iliad 24. – (Kuhns) Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprach- forschung 134: 9–95.
]
[
Delbrück B. 1888. Syntaktische Forschungen V. Altindische Syntax. Halle: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.
]
[
Edwards G. 1971. The language of Hesiod. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]
[
García-Ramón J. 2012. En travaillant à une grammaire du mycénien. – Carlier P. e.a. (eds.). Études mycéniennes 2010 : actes du XIIIe Colloque international sur les textes égéens : Sèvres, Paris, Nanterre, 20–30 septembre 2010. Pisa: Serra: 435–454.
]
[
Gemoll A. 1886. Die homerischen Hymnen. Leipzig: Teubner.
]
[
Goodwin W. Syntax of the moods and tenses of the Greek verb. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
]
[
Hermann G. 1801. De emendanda ratione Graecae grammaticae. Leipzig: Fleischer.
]
[
Hermann G. 1806. Homeri Hymni et Epigrammata. Leipzig: Weidmann.
]
[
Hoffmann K. 1967. Der Injunktiv im Veda. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
]
[
Kühner R., Blass F. 1892. Griechische Grammatik. Formenlehre. Zweiter Band. Hannover: Hahn.
]
[
Levin S. 1969. Remarks on the ‘historical’ present and comparable phenomena of syntax. – Foundations of Language 5: 386–390.
]
[
Misteli F. 1868. Über die accentuation des griechischen. – (Kuhns) Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 17: 81–134.
]
[
Monro D. 1891. A grammar of the Homeric dialect. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]
[
Paley F. 1861. The epics of Hesiod, with an English commentary. London: Whittaker.
]
[
Pelliccia H. 1985. The structure of the Archaic Greek Hymns. [unpublished PhD dissertation, Yale University]. Perseus [available at: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/collection?collection=Perseus: collection:Greco-Roman, accessed: 30 January 2023]
]
[
Renou L. 1928. Les formes dites d’injonctif dans le RgVeda. – [sine editore] Étrennes linguistiques offertes par quelques amis à Émile Benveniste. Paris: Paul Geuthner: 63–80.
]
[
Richardson N. 2010. Three Homeric hymns: To Apollo, Hermes and Aphrodite (Hymns 3, 4 and 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]
[
Rijksbaron A. 2009. Discourse cohesion in the proem of Hesiod’s Theogony. – Bakker S., Wakker G. (eds.). Discourse cohesion in Ancient Greek. Leiden: Brill: 241–265.
]
[
Rowe, C.J. 1978. Essential Hesiod. Theogony 1–232, 453–733 works and days 1–307 with introduction and notes by C.J. Rowe. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.
]
[
Ruijgh C.J. 1971. Autour de “τε épique”. Études sur la syntaxe grecque. Amsterdam: Hakkert.
]
[
Schmidt M. 1982. δείκνυμι. – Voigt E. (eds.). Lexikon des frühgriechischen Epos. 10. Lieferung: βάδην – Διώνη. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht: 232–233.
]
[
Schneidewin F. 1847. Die homerischen Hymnen auf Apollon. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
]
[
Sjölund R. 1938. Metrische Kürzung im Griechischen. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells. Thesaurus Linguae Graecae [available at: http://stephanus.tlg.uci.edu/Iris/inst/tsearch.jsp, accessed: 30 January 2023].
]
[
Troxler H. 1964. Sprache und Wortschatz Hesiods. Zürich: Juris.
]
[
Veitch W. 1879. Greek verbs. Defective and irregular. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]
[
Vendler Z. 1957. Verbs and times. – The Philosophic Review 66: 143–160. Vogrinz G. 1889. Grammatik des homerischen Dialektes. Paderborn: Schöningh.
]
[
Von Hartel W. 1871. Homerische Studien I. – Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Classe der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften aus Wien 68: 383–468.
]
[
Von Hartel W. 1874a. Homerische Studien II. Wien: Karl Gerold’s Sohn.
]
[
Von Hartel W. 1874b. Homerische Studien III. Wien: Karl Gerold’s Sohn.
]
[
West M. 1978. Hesiod. Works and days. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]
[
West M. 1989. An unrecognized injunctive usage in Greek. – Glotta 67: 135–138.
]