2082-7695
Tendencje behawioralne w polityce zagranicznej Turcji w okresie rządów Partii Sprawiedliwości i Rozwoju
Behavioral trends in Turkish foreign policy during the rule of the Justice and Development Party
Kopyś
Tadeusz
author
Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie
03bqmcz70
Correspondence to: Tadeusz Kopyś tadeusz.kopys@uj.edu.pl
23
12
2023
Tom 17
2023
13
39
Copyright © 2023
2023
<p>Zachowania polityki zagranicznej Turcji w danym okresie można zrozumieć analizując partię rządzącą i stosunki wewnętrzne, interesy i skład rządzącej koalicji oraz dominującą dynamikę międzynarodową. Celem artykułu jest pokazanie, że zmiany paradygmatyczne w polityce zagranicznej i motory dążenia Turcji do autonomicznej przestrzeni politycznej mogą być rozumiane jako wynik powiązanych ze sobą przemian na poziomie globalnym, regionalnym i krajowym. Po 2010 r. turecka polityka zagraniczna naznaczona była okresem „autonomizacji”, w którym rządząca partia postanowiła wypełnić geopolityczną próżnię powstałą w regionie po fiasku negocjacji z Unią Europejską w zakresie stopniowego wycofywania się Stanów Zjednoczonych z lokalnej szachownicy dyplomatycznej. </p>
[
Altunışık, M.B., The New Turn in Turkey’s Foreign Policy in the Middle East: Regional and Domestic Insecurities, Istituto Affari Internazionali, 17 VII 2020.
]
[
Aydin, M., Determinants of Turkish Foreign Policy: Changing Patterns and Conjunctures during the Cold War, „Middle Eastern Studies” 2000, vol. 36, no. 1.
]
[
Aydin, U., Rule‑takers, rule‑makers, or rule‑promoters? Turkey and Mexico’s role as rising middle powers in global economic governance, „Regulation & Governance” 2019, vol. 15, no. 3.
]
[
Baker, R., The EastMed Gas and Philia Forums: Reimagining Cooperation in the Mediterranean [18 III 2021], https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy‑analysis/.
]
[
Çagaptay, S., Erdogan’s empire: Turkey and the politics of the Middle East, London 2019.
]
[
Chin, G. & Quadir, F., Introduction: Rising States, Rising Donors and the Global Aid Regime, „Cambridge Review of International Affairs” 2012, vol. 25, no. 4.
]
[
Dal, P.E. & Kursun, A.M., Assessing Turkey’s middle power foreign policy in MIKTA, „International Journal” 2016 , vol. 71, no. 4, Special Issue: Middle Power Diplomacy.
]
[
Davutoğlu, A., Turkey’s Mediation: Critical Reflections From the Field, „Middle East Policy” 2013, vol. 20, no. 1.
]
[
Donelli, F., Explaining the Role of Intervening Variables in Turkey’s Foreign Policy Behaviour, „Interdisciplinary Political Studies” 2020, no. 6(2).
]
[
East, A.M., Size and Foreign Policy Behavior: A Test of Two Models, „World Politics” 1973, vol. 25, no. 4.
]
[
Erşen, E., Evaluating the Fighter Jet Crisis in Turkish‑Russian Relations, „Insight Turkey” 2017, vol. 19, no. 4.
]
[
Florini, A., Rising Asian Powers and Changing Global Governance, „International Studies Review” 2011, vol. 13, no. 1.
]
[
Fotiou, E. & Triantaphyllou, D., Assessing Turkey’s „Soft Power” Role: Rhetoric versus Practice, „The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs” 2010, vol. 45, no. 1.
]
[
Gadelmola, S.M., Determinants and dimensions of the shift in Turkish behavior towards northern Syria since 2016, „Review of Economics and Political Science” 2020, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/REPS-07-2019-0096/full/html.
]
[
Galal, A.M., External behavior of small states in light of theories of international relations, „Review of Economics and Political Science” 2020, vol. 5, no. 1.
]
[
Jung, D. & Piccoli, W., The Turkish‑Israeli Alignment: Paranoia or Pragmatism?, „Security Dialogue” 2000, vol. 31, no. 1.
]
[
Kalaycıoğlu, E., Public Choice and Foreign Affairs: Democracy and International Relations in Turkey, „New Perspectives on Turkey” 2009, no. 40.
]
[
Kardas, S., Turkey on NATO’s Role in the MENA: Perspectives from a „Central Country”, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2012.
]
[
Keyman, F.E., A new Turkish policy: Towards „Moral Realism”, „Insight Turkey” 2017.
]
[
Kirişçi, K., The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State, „New Perspectives on Turkey” 2009, no. 40.
]
[
Kuru, T.A., Turkey’s Failed Policy Toward the Arab Spring: Three Levels of Analysis, „Mediterranean Quarterly” 2015, vol. 26, no. 3.
]
[
Kutlay, M. & Öniş, Z., Turkish foreign policy in a post‑western order: strategic autonomy or new forms of dependence?, „International Affairs” 2021, vol. 97, issue 4.
]
[
Merz, F., Trouble with Turkey in the Eastern Mediterranean, CSS Analysis in Security Policy, 2020, no. 275.
]
[
Meyer, H., Turkey’s à la carte foreign policy [25 XI 2022], https://www.ips‑journal.eu/topics/foreign‑and‑security‑policy/turkeys‑a‑la‑carte‑foreign‑policy-6346/.
]
[
Oğurlu, E., Rising Tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy, Istituto Affari Internazionali Working Papers” 2012, vol. 12, no. 4.
]
[
Oğuzlu, H.T., Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order, „All Azimuth” 2020, vol. 9, no. 1.
]
[
Öniş, Z. & Kutlay, M., Rising powers in a changing global order: the political economy of Turkey in the age of BRICs, „Third World Quarterly” 2013, vol. 34, no. 8.
]
[
Öniş, Z., Multiple Faces of the ‘New’ Turkish Foreign Policy: Underlying Dynamics and a Critique, „Insight Turkey” 2011, vol. 13, no. 1.
]
[
Öniş, Z., The Triumph of Conservative Globalism: The Political Economy of the AKP Era, „Turkish Studies” 2012, vol. 13.
]
[
Özel, S., Quest for Autonomy: History, Geopolitics and Ideology in Turkish Foreign Policy [5 I 2023], https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/quest‑autonomy‑history‑geopolitics‑and‑ideology‑turkish‑foreign‑policy.
]
[
Özkan, B., Turkey, Davutoglu and the Idea of Pan‑Islamism, „Survival” 2014, vol. 56, no. 4.
]
[
Rubin, J., State Department: Israel was never invited to the NATO summit, „Washington Post”, 25 IV 2012.
]
[
Schirm, A.S., Leaders in Need of Followers: Emerging Powers in Global Governance, „European Journal of International Relations” 2020, vol. 16, no. 2.
]
[
Schmid, D. & Domingues dos Santos, E., The France‑Greece Partnership Beyond the Eastern Mediterranean, II 2022, The Center for Applied Turkey Studies.
]
[
Stephen, M., The Concept and Role of Middle Powers during Global Rebalancing, „Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations” 2013, vol. 14, no. 2.
]
[
Tahiroğlu, M., Adrift, at Home and Abroad: What’s Driving Turkey’s Foreign Policy Toward Greece?, 16 XII 2022, Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Washington.
]
[
Talbot, V., Is Turkey Making Friends Again?, The Italian Institute for International Political Studies, 29 XI 2021.
]
[
Terhalle, M., Reciprocal Socialization: Rising Powers and the West, „International Studies Perspectives” 2011, vol. 12, no. 4.
]
[
Yorulmazlar, E. & Turhan, E., Turkish Foreign Policy Towards the Arab Spring: Between Western Orientation and Regional Disorder, „Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies” 2015, vol. 17, no. 3.
]
[
Urbanik, A., Neoosmanizm. Polityka zagraniczna Turcji okresu rządów Partii Sprawiedliwości i Rozwoju (AKP), „Edukacja Humanistyczna” 2014, vol. 31, no. 2.
]
[
Uzgel, İ., Turkey and the Mediterranean imbroglio, XI 2010, Friedrich‑Ebert‑Stiftung.
]
[
Zalewski, P., How Turkey Went From ‘Zero Problems’ to Zero Friends, „Foreign Policy”, 22 VIII 2013.
]