In search for useful understanding of the term “privacy” for tax matters Drywa Anna author Katedra Prawa Finansowego, Wydział Prawa i Administracji, Uniwersytet Gdański Correspondence to: Anna Drywa a.drywa@prawo.ug.edu.pl 30 09 2022 Issue 27 (3)/2022 2022 1 15 Copyright © 2022 2022 <p>The terminology issue regarding the concept of “privacy” seems to be increasingly important in the context of the changing tax reality in which the emphasis is put even more strongly than before on the protection of fiscal interest, at the expense of limiting the sphere of taxpayers&#039; privacy, in particular through the expansion of their surveillance on an unprecedented scale.</p> <p>The OECD, in its notable achievements, treats the taxpayer&#039;s right to privacy very superficially. In one of the documents, which is a kind of report on the rights and obligations of taxpayers in force in individual countries, we can read that “All taxpayers have the right to expect that the tax authorities will not intrude unnecessarily upon their privacy”. I would argue that this statement is far not enough in the reality of current technological possibilities and realizes too narrow protection of taxpayer’s right. The issue of taxpayers’ right to privacy should be introduced to public and scientific awareness. But how should the term privacy itself be understood? The answer is not easy, one the term is not precise so understanding is difficult though the literature on this issue is very broad. Two it is rarely used on the ground of debate on taxation. The critical approach has led to a review of the immensely rich body of literature on the theory of privacy and the right to privacy, and an attempt to adopt an understanding of the term “privacy” that will also be useful in tax matters. There is the absence of a consensus on the adoption of a particular way of defining “privacy”. For that reason it has to be emphasized that there is no theoretical basis to conduct a discussion on this specific taxpayer right, which is right to privacy. This paper is an attempt to find such understanding of the term &#34;privacy&#34; that will be useful in tax context.<br /><br /></p> 1 Beardsley E., Privacy: Autonomy and Selective Disclosure [in:] Nomos XIII: Privacy, J.R. Pennock, J.W. Chapman eds., New York 1971. 2 Bloustein E.J., Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser, New York University Law Review 1964, vol. 39, No. 6. 3 Brzeziński B., Szkice z wykładni prawa podatkowego, Gdańsk 2002. 4 DeCew J.W., In Pursuit of Privacy. Law, Ethics, and Rise of Technology, Ithaca and London 1997. 5 DeCew J.W., The Scope of Privacy in Law and Ethics, Law and Philosophy, 1986, vol. 5, no. 2. 6 Dopierała R., Prywatność w perspektywie zmiany społecznej [Privacy in the perspective of social change], Kraków 2013. 7 Drywa A., Taxpayer’s Right to Privacy?, Intertax 2022, vol.50, issue 1. 8 Ferenc-Kopeć D., Definicje legalne w dokumentach międzynarodowej ochrony praw człowieka [w:] M. Król, A. Bartczak, M. Zalewska (red.), Integracja zewnętrzna i wewnętrzna nauk prawnych, cz. 2, Łódź 2014. 9 Gavison R., Privacy and the Limits of the Law, Yale Law Review, 1980, no. 89. 10 Gross H., Privacy and Autonomy [in:] Nomos XIII: Privacy, J.R. Pennock, J.W. Chapman eds., New York 1971. 11 Henkin L., Human Dignity and Constitutional Rights [in:] the Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values, M.J. Meyer, W.A. Parent eds., 1992. 12 Henkin L., Privacy and Autonomy, Columbia Law Review, 1974, vol. 74, no. 8. 13 Hudson Jr. D.L., The Right to Privacy, New York 2011. 14 Innes J.C., Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation, Oxford 1992. 15 Janion M., Odnawianie znaczeń [Renewal of meanings], Kraków 1980. 16 Kahn J., Privacy as a Legal Principle of Identity Maintenance, Seton Hall Law Review, 2003, vol. 33. 17 Kański L., Prawo do prywatności, nienaruszalności mieszkania i tajemnicy korespondencji [Right to privacy, inviolability of the home, and secrecy of correspondence [in:] Prawa człowieka. Model prawny [Human rights. Legal model], R. Wieruszewski eds., Wrocław 1991. 18 Kopff A., Koncepcja praw do intymności i do prywatności życia osobistego. Zagadnienia konstrukcyjne, Studia Cywilistyczne, [Conception of the right to intimacy and privacy of personal life. Design questions. Civil Law Studies] vol. XX, Warszawa-Kraków 1972. 19 Leith P., The Socio-Legal Context of Privacy, International Journal of Law in Context, 2006, no. 2. 20 Marcus A., Privacy in Eighteenth-Century Aleppo: the Limits of Cultural Ideals, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 1986, vol. 18. 21 OECD, Taxpayers’ Rights and Obligations – Practice Note, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, 1990, p. 5; available at: https://www.oecd.org/tax/administration/Taxpayers%27_Rights_and_Obligations-Practice_Note.pdf  (accesed: 21.03.2022) 22 Osiatyński W., Prawa człowieka i ich granice, Kraków 2011. 23 Parent W.A., A New Definition of Privacy for the Law, Law and Philosophy, 1983, vol.2, No.3. 24 Parent W.A., Recent Work on the Concept of Privacy, American Philosophical Quarterly, 1983A, vol 20, no. 4. 25 Posner R.A., Privacy, Surveillance, and Law, The University of Chicago Law Review, 2008, no. 75. 26 Post R.C., Three Concepts of Privacy, The Georgetown Law Journal, 2001, vol. 89 (6). 27 Prosser W., Privacy, California Law Review, 1960, vol. 48, No. 3. 28 Regan P.M., Legislating Privacy. Technology, Social Values and Public Policy, The University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill &amp; London, 1995. 29 Reiman J.H., Privacy, Intimacy and Personhood, Philosophical &amp; Public Affairs 1976, no. 6. 30 Rössler B., The Value of Privacy, Cambridge-Malden 2005. 31 Schwartz P., The Future of Tax Privacy, National Tax Journal, 2008, vol. 61, No. 4., p. 883. 32 Shils E., Privacy: its Constitution and Vicissitudes, Law and Contemporary Problems, 1966, no.31. 33 Sofsky W., Privacy. A Manifesto, Princeton&amp; Oxford, 2008. 34 Solove D.J., Conceptualizing Privacy, California Law Review, 2002, vol 1087, no. 90. 35 Solove D.J., Understanding Privacy, Cambridge-London 2009. 36 Thomson J.J., The Right to Privacy, Philosophy &amp; Public Affairs, 1975, vol. 4, no. 4. 37 Warren S.D., Brandeis L.D., The Right to Privacy, Harvard Law Review, 1890, vol. 4, no. 5. 38 Westin A.F., Privacy and Freedom, New York 1967. 39 Yang C., Kluver R., Information Society and Privacy in the People's Republic of China, Journal of E-Government, 2006, vol. 2, no. 4. 40 Zaborek T. [w:] Ordynacja podatkowa w teorii i praktyce, pod red. B. Kucia-Guściory, M. Münnich, L. Bieleckiego, A. Krukowskiego, Lublin 2008. 42 CJEU, ruling of 2nd October 2018, Ministerio Fiscal, C-207/16. 43 ECHR, ruling of 18th December 1996, Loizidou v. Turkey, 15318/89. 44 ECHR, ruling of 22th December 2020, Usmanov v. Russia, 43936/18. 45 ECHR, ruling of 26th March, 1987, Leander v. Sweden, 9248/81. 46 ECHR, ruling of 16th February, 2000, Amann v. Switzerland, 27798/95.