Algorithmic Subordination as a Novel Criterion for Determining Employee Status in the Context of Atypical Forms of Employment
Wybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 26.02.2026
Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej (Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy), Volume 33 (2026), Tom 33 Zeszyt 1, s. 15-23
https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.26.002.23178Autorzy
Algorithmic Subordination as a Novel Criterion for Determining Employee Status in the Context of Atypical Forms of Employment
This article advances the thesis that algorithmic subordination should operate as a legally cognisable indicator of employment status within European labour law. Building upon the Court of Justice’s autonomous concept of the “worker” and the Union legislature’s recent intervention in Directive (EU) 2024/2831 of 23 October 2024 on improving working conditions in platform work (OJ L 2024/2831, hereinafter referred to as: “the Directive”), the argument proceeds in three steps. First, it reconstructs subordination as a functional criterion that can be revealed through digital control measures, in particular the allocation of tasks, monitoring, price setting, evaluation and deactivation effected by algorithms. Secondly, it examines how this control reconfigures both sides of the personal work relation, by sharpening tests for employee status and by pressing toward a re‑specification of the employer concept, including scenarios of joint or indirect employer responsibility. Thirdly, it draws on Member State practice, notably Spain and Italy, to show how rebuttable presumptions, transparency obligations and data‑protection enforcement can be linedup to evidence and to constrain algorithmic power in the workplace. The article concludes that algorithmic subordination, when bounded by appropriate procedural and substantive safeguards, warrants recognition as a criterion for classifying work performed in atypical arrangements as employment. It recommends legislative and judicial techniques to ensure the effective implementation of Directive (EU) 2024/2831, while preserving the distinction between genuine self‑employment and employment.
Adams ‑Prassl J., Gruber ‑Risak M. (2016) Uber, Taskrabbit, & Co.: Platform as Employers? Rethinking the Legal Analysis of Crowdwork, “Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal,” No. 8.
Cavallini G. (2018) The First Italian Decision on the Status of Gig Workers Denies Reclassification, https://elw-network.eu/first-italian-decision-status-gig-workers-denies-reclassification/ (access: 10 March 2025).
De Stefano V., Aloisi A. (2018) European Legal Framework for Digital Labour Platforms, Luxembourg.
EU-OSHA (2022) Spain: The ‘Riders’ Law’, New Regulation on Digital Platform Work, https://healthy-workplaces.osha.europa.eu/en/publications/spain-riders-law-new-regulation-digital-platform-work-0 (access: 14 February 2025).
Eurofound (2018) Turin Tribunal Denies Employee Status for Foodora Riders – Overturned, https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/platformeconomydb/turin-tribunal-denies-employee-status-for-foodora-riders-overturned-97101 ( access: 10 March 2025).
Griesbach K., Reich A., Elliott ‑Negri L., Milkman R. (2019) Algorithmic Control in Platform Food Delivery Work, “Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World,” 30 August.
Hießl C. (2011) Case Law on Algorithmic Management at the Workplace, Cross ‑European Comparative Analysis and Tentative Conclusions, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3982735 (access: 6 May 2025).
Hießl C. (2022) Platform Workers: Employees ‑to ‑Be in the EU?, https://global-workplace-law-and-policy.kluwerlawonline.com/2022/11/10/platform-workers-employees-to-be-in-the-eu/ (access: 25 October 2025).
Litardi C. et al. (2024) Regulatory Responses to Algorithmic Management in the EU, https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/all/regulatory-responses-algorithmic-management-eu (access: 25 October 2025).
Purificato I. (2021) Behind the Scenes of Deliveroo’s Algorithm: The Discriminatory Effect of Frank’s Blindness, “Italian Labour Law e ‑Journal,” Vol. 14, No. 1.
Tomaszewska M. (2011) Prawo integracji stosunku pracy między jednością a rożnorodnością [The Law of Integration of the Employment Relationship. Between Unity and Diversity], Gdańsk.
Tomaszewska M. (2025) Transparency and Algorithmic Oversight in the Digital Workplace: Legal Challenges under Directive 2024/2831, “Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej,” vol. 32, No. 3.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 23 March 1982, 53/81, Levin, ECLI:EU:C:1982:105.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 3 July 1986, 66/85, Lawrie ‑Blum, ECLI:EU:C:1986:284.
Judgment of the Court of 15 December 1995, C-415/93, Union royale belge des sociétés de football association and Others v. Bosman and Others, ECLI:EU:C:1995:463.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 12 May 1998, C-85/96, Martínez Sala v. Freistaat Bayern, ECLI:EU:C:1998:217.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 13 January 2004, C-256/01, Allonby, ECLI:EU:C:2004:18.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 7 September 2004, C-456/02, Trojani, ECLI:EU:C:2004:488.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 4 December 2014, C-413/13, FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media v. Staat der Nederlanden, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2411.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 10 September 2015, C-47/14, Holterman Ferho Exploitatie BV and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2015:574.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 20 December 2017, C-434/15, Asociación Profesional Elite Taxi v. Uber Systems Spain SL, ECLI:EU:C:2017:981.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 20 November 2018, C-147/17, Sindicatul Familia Constanța and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2018:926.
Order of the Court of Justice of 22 April 2020, C-692/19, B v. Yodel Delivery Network Ltd, ECLI:EU:C:2020:288.
Directive (EU) 2024/2831 of 23 October 2024 on improving working conditions in platform work, OJ L 2024/2831.
Informacje: Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej (Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy), Volume 33 (2026), Tom 33 Zeszyt 1, s. 15-23
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Uniwersytet Gdański
ul. Bażyńskiego 1a 80-952 Gdańsk, Polska
Publikacja: 26.02.2026
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY 4.0
Udział procentowy autorów:
Numer klasyfikacji:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 93
Liczba pobrań: 118