“Romanian October” Means Breakthroughs and Revaluations in Romania’s Foreign Policy in the First Half of the 60’s of the 20th Century (From the Windows of the Polish People’s Republic Embassy in Bucharest)
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 21.11.2024
Studia Środkowoeuropejskie i Bałkanistyczne, 2024, Tom XXXIII, s. 113 - 137
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543733XSSB.24.007.20031Autorzy
“Romanian October” Means Breakthroughs and Revaluations in Romania’s Foreign Policy in the First Half of the 60’s of the 20th Century (From the Windows of the Polish People’s Republic Embassy in Bucharest)
After the breakthrough of Polish October 1956, the substantive value of the information contained in the documentation of PPR diplomacy has undoubtedly increased, allowing a better understanding of international relations also between communist countries whose sovereignty was limited. This also applies to the foreign policy of Romania, whose activity in the first half of the 1960s, in the opinion of many historians, led to the country gaining considerable – compared to other Kremlin satellites – independence. The purpose of this article, therefore, is to show, on the basis of surviving sources, how PPR diplomacy perceived and assessed the transformation of Communist Romania’s foreign policy goals, directions and priorities during this period. These eventually led to Romania’s opening up to wider contacts with Western countries, but most importantly to Bucharest’s attempts to undermine the Soviet Union’s dictates in Eastern Bloc foreign policy, through such actions as vetoing Khrushchev’s plans to reform the Council of Mutual Economic Assistance and being cocksure about the Soviet-Chinese conflict. Changes also occurred on domestic grounds, mainly in the cultural sphere, in the form of a programmatic reduction of the influence of Russian and Slavic culture in general, a return to the world of Romanian culture, but also the rise of nationalist sentiment. The diplomacy observing the Romanian transformations and thus the PPR authorities generally supported the de-Stalinization of the “brotherly country” (it was even noted that Romanians referred to their own transition as the “Romanian October”), but were negative about any tendencies that challenged the Kremlin’s dominance in the Eastern Bloc’s foreign policy. The problem, however, was that at the root of the Romanian transition of the first half of the 1960s was also the desire of Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej’s team to avoid a broader de-Stalinization campaign in order to continue in power.
Archiwum Ministerstwa Spraw Zagranicznych w Warszawie – Departament I, Rumunia
Documente fundamentale ale regimului communist din Romania (1848–1989), C. Stanciu (ed.), Târgovişte 2012.
Buga V., O vară fierbinte în relaţiile româno-sovietice. Convorbilire de la Moscova din julie 1964, Bucureşti 2012.
Marx K., Însemnări despre Români, Bacău 2014.
Nowak K., Rumuńska afera z Karolem Marksem z 1964 r. (w świetle źródeł dyplomacji PRL), in: Środkowa i wschodnia Europa w zwierciadle historii wielkiej oraz codziennej. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana Profesorowi Sylwestrowi Fertaczowi, M. Gruszczyk, J. Januszewska-Jurkiewicz, L. Krzyżanowski, M. Skrzypek (eds.), Bielsko-Biała 2021.
Zbiór Dokumentów 1957, nr 11; 1960, nr 11–12.
Anton M., O vizită cu multe semne de întrebare: N.S. Hruşciov la Bucureşti 18–25 iunie 1962, “Archivele Totalitarismului” 2007, no. 3–4.
Boia L., Dlaczego Rumunia jest inna?, Kraków 2013.
Buga V., Lumini şi umbre. Relaţiile economice româno-sovietice 1965–1989, Bucureşti 2019.
Burakowski A., Geniusz Karpat. Dyktatura Nicolae Cauşescu 1965–1989, Warszawa 2008.
Catanuş D., Repariţia problemei Basarabiei în relaţiile româno-sovietice la începutul anilor 1960, in: Problema Basarabiei in relatiile Romano-sovietic 1918–2018, coord. F-R. Mihai, V. Buga, Bucureşti 2020.
Catanus D., Destalinizarea în versiune româneasca: cazul Miron Constantinescu-Iosif Chisinevschi 1956–1961, “Arhivele Totalitarismului” 1999, no. 3–4.
Catanus D., Romanian Communists Under the Impact of Destalinization 1956–1961, “Arhivele Totalitarismului” 2002, no. 1–2.
Catanuş D., Tot mai departe de Moscova… Politica externa a Romaniei 1956–1965, Bucureşti 2011.
Chiper I., Constantiniu F., Modelul stalinist de sovietizare a României, par. 1, “Arhivele Totalitarismului” 1995, no. 2.
Chiper I., Constantiniu F., Modelul stalinist de sovietizare a României, part 2, “Arhivele Totalitarismului” 1995, no. 3.
Costache B., Activitatea României in consiliul de ajutor economic reciproc 1949–1974, Bucuresti 2012.
Deletant D., Romania under communist rule, ed. II, Bucharest 2006.
Dragomir E., Opoziţia din interior. România şi politicile CAER faţă de CEE (1957–1989), vol. I, Târgovişte 2019.
Dubicki A., Współpraca polsko-rumuńska w ramach RWPG do roku 1962 (do XVI Sesji RWPG), “Studia Środkoweuropejskie i Bałkanistyczne” 2017, vol. XXV.
Historia dyplomacji polskiej, vol. VI: 1944/1945–1989, W. Materski, W. Michowicza (eds.), Warszawa 2010.
Manea G.S., Un adulter în familia comunistă. România şi SUA în ani’60, Târgovişte 2016.
Retegan M., Conducerea PMR şi evenimentele din Polonia şi Ungaria 1956, “Arhivele Totalitarismului” 1995, no. 1.
Roske O., Colectivizarea agricultirii-represiunea totală 1957–1962, III, “Arhivele Totalitarismului” 1995, no. 3.
Skobelski R., Polityka PRL wobec państw socjalistycznych w latach 1956–1970. Współpraca – napięcia – konflikty, Poznań 2010.
Tismăneanu V., Stalinizm na każdą okazję. Polityczna historia rumuńskiego komunizmu, Kraków 2010.
Willaume M., Rumunia, Warszawa 2004.
Informacje: Studia Środkowoeuropejskie i Bałkanistyczne, 2024, Tom XXXIII, s. 113 - 137
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
ul. Bankowa 12, 40-007 Katowice, Polska
Publikacja: 21.11.2024
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY
Udział procentowy autorów:
Informacje o autorze:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
Angielski