‘It was Worth Having a Go’ but ‘We Were Forced to Migrate’. Reconciling Contradictions in Poles’, Ukrainians’ and Belarusians’ Retrospective Accounts of their Migration Decision-Making
Wybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 09.06.2025
Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 2025 (LI), Nr 1 (195), s. 37-54
https://doi.org/10.4467/25444972SMPP.25.006.21389Autorzy
‘It was Worth Having a Go’ but ‘We Were Forced to Migrate’. Reconciling Contradictions in Poles’, Ukrainians’ and Belarusians’ Retrospective Accounts of their Migration Decision-Making
Based on semi-structured interviews which I conducted in Poland in 2019–24 with Ukrainians, Poles and Belarusians, this article discusses the motifs of coercion and volition in how interviewees talked about making decisions to migrate, move on or return. I try to unravel the apparently contradictory feelings with which they engaged in migration. On the one hand, they were participants in migration waves – large-scale movements of co-nationals which offered opportunities to migrate abroad with a certain security that someone they knew would be on hand to help. On the other hand, while acknowledging that they took such opportunities, sometimes on an experimental basis, labour migrants often say they felt ‘forced’ to migrate. They claim, apparently paradoxically, to have ‘decided’ (rather than ‘realised’) that migration was ‘necessary’. Their belief that they can decide for themselves implies a sense of agency, linked to the fact that neighbours and relatives are making similar choices. However, local migration cultures can act as constraints which make international migration seem ‘naturally’ preferable to livelihoods in their country of origin. The family is also a locus of control and women sometimes emphasised that they did not have a free choice: the household migration strategy was decided by their husband or partner.
Benson M., O’Reilly K. (2016). From lifestyle migration to lifestyle in migration: categories, concepts and ways of thinking. Migration Studies, 4, 1: 20–37.
Botterill K. (2011). Mobility and immobility in the European Union: experiences of young Polish people living in the UK. Studia Migracyjne-Przegląd Polonijny, 1: 47–70.
Brunarska Z., Kindler M., Szulecka M., Toruńczyk-Ruiz S. (2016). Ukrainian migration to Poland: a “local” mobility? in O. Fedyuk, M. Kindler (eds) Ukrainian Migration to the European Union: Lessons from Migration Studies, Cham: Springer, pp. 115–132.
Brzozowska, A. (2018). Społeczne zakotwiczenie w klasowo-etnicznych formach tożsamości a integracja polskich i ukraińskich migrantów. Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 1 (167): 69–99.
Carling J., Collins F. (2018). Aspiration, desire and drivers of migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 6: 909–926.
Czaika M., Bijak J., Prike T. (2021). Migration decision-making and its key dimensions, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 697(1): 15–31.
Eade J., Drinkwater S., Garapich M. P. (2007) Class and ethnicity – Polish migrants in London, Guildford: Universities of Surrey and Roehampton Centre for Research on Nationalism, Ethnicity and Multiculturalism CRONEM.
Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Engbersen G., Grabowska-Lusinska I., Leerkes A., Snel E., Burgers J. (2013). On the differential attachments of migrants from Central and Eastern Europe: a typology of labour migration, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(6): 959–81.
Erdal M. B., Oeppen C. (2018). Forced to leave? The discursive and analytical significance of describing migration as forced and voluntary. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44:6, 981–998.
Galasińska A., Kozłowska O. (2009). Discourses of a “normal” life among post-Accession migrants from Poland to Britain, in K. Burrell (ed) Polish Migration to the UK in the ‘New’ European Union: After 2004, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 87–105.
Górny A., Kołodziejczyk K., Madej K., Kaczmarczyk P. (2019). Nowe obszary docelowe w migracji z Ukrainy do Polski. Przypadek Bydgoszczy i Wrocławia na tle innych miast, Warsaw: Warsaw University Centre of Migration Research, Working Paper 118/176.
Grabowska I. (2016). Migration in working lives: looking back after return; a structure and agency approach, in R. Nadler, Z. Kovács, B. Glorius, T. Lang (eds) Return Migration and Regional Development in Europe. Mobility against the Stream, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 83–109.
Gwosdz K., Sobala-Gwosdz A., Górecki J., Jarzębiński M., Rotter-Jarzębińska K and Fiedeń Ł (2019). Potencjał miast średnich w Polsce dla lokalizacji inwestycji BPO/SSC/IT/R&D. Analiza, ocena i rekomendacje, Warsaw: Association of Business Service Leaders.
Hagen-Zanken J., Hennessey G., Mazzilli C. (2023). Subjective and intangible factors in migration decision-making: a review of side-lined literature, Migration Studies, 11, 2: 349–59.
Heffner K., Solga, B. (2013). Features of a migration region – an analysis using the example of the Opolskie Voivodship, in D. Szymańska, J. Chodkowska-Miszczuk (eds) Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, No. 20, Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press, pp. 43–58.
Hondagneu-Sotelo P. (1994). Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jończy R., Rokita-Poskart D. (2014). Zmiany w zakresie zatrudnienia w Polsce i za granicą ludności autochtonicznej województwa opolskiego w okresie 2004–2010, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 196: 145–57.
Kandel W., Massey, D. S. (2002). The culture of Mexican migration: a theoretical and empirical analysis, Social Forces 80(3): 981–1004.
Kindler M., Szulecka, M. (2022). Messy arrangements? A social networks perspective on migrant labor brokerage: the case of Ukrainian migration to Poland’, Polish Sociological Review, 220: 457–84.
Leffel L., Piller S., Peled E. (2023). Migration decision-making process: dialectic contradictions experienced by asylum-seeking women’, Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 52(5): 527–46.
Luthra R., Platt L., Salamońska J. (2014). Migrant diversity, migration motivations and early integration: the case of Poles in Germany, the Netherlands, London and Dublin, LSE Europe in Question Series (LEQS) discussion paper No. 74.
Main I. (2016). Motivations for mobility and settlement of Polish female migrants in Barcelona and Berlin, Social Identities, 22(1): 62–79.
Morawska E. (2001). Structuring migration: the case of Polish income-seeking travelers to the West, Theory and Society, 30(1): 47–80.
Pszczółkowska D. (2024) How Migrants Choose their Destinations. Factors Influencing Post-EU Accession Choices and Decisions to Remain, London: Routledge.
Robins D. (2022). Immobility as loyalty: ‘voluntariness’ and narratives of a duty to stay in the context of (non)migration decision making, Geoforum, 134: 22–9.
Smart G. (2023). Discourse-oriented ethnography, in J. P. Gee and M. Handford (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edition, London: Routledge.
Śleszyński P. (2018). Polska średnich miast. Założenia i koncepcja deglomeracji w Polsce,Warsaw: Klub Jagielloński).
White A. (2010). Young people and migration from contemporary Poland, Journal of Youth Studies, 13:5: 65–580.
White A. (2011). Polish Families and Migration since EU Accession, Bristol: Policy Press.
White A. (2016). Polish circular migration and marginality: a livelihood strategy approach, Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny no. 1 (159): 151–64.
White A. (2018). Polish society abroad, in A. White, I. Grabowska, P. Kaczmarczyk, K. Slany, The Impact of Migration on Poland: EU Mobility and Social Change, London: UCL Press, pp. 186–212.
White A. (2024a). Polish Cities of Migration: the Migration Transition in Kalisz, Piła and Płock, London, UCL Press.
White A. (2024b). Ściągnąć (Poland), in A. Ledeneva (ed) The Global Encyclopaedia of Informality: a Hitchhiker’s Guide to Informal Problem-solving in Human Life, vol 3, London: UCL Press, pp. 403–6.
Informacje: Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 2025 (LI), Nr 1 (195), s. 37-54
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
University College London
Wielka Brytania
Publikacja: 09.06.2025
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY
Udział procentowy autorów:
Informacje o autorze:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
Angielski