Autonomia prawa w europejskiej koncepcji państwa prawnego
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 13.12.2024
Rocznik Administracji Publicznej, 2024, 2024 (10), s. 59-72
https://doi.org/10.4467/24497800RAP.24.004.20222Autorzy
Autonomy of Law in the European Conception of the Legal State
The principle of a democratic legal state has become a paradigm for modern democracies and an essential value of the EU. It still raises, though, emotional disputes. This text explores its selected aspects, specifically the theory of the autonomy of the legal system, discussing in this respect the findings of legal academics from different legislations, representing different legal systems and cultures. The following research focuses on the concept of systemicity as outlined by Hans Kelsen, which is confronted with Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems, eventually adapted in the legal sciences by Günther Teubner, to whom jurisprudence owes the theory of autopoietic law. The research includes reflections on the concepts of ‘rule of law’ and ‘legalism’ from the perspective of the autonomy of law, as well as its dimensions in the views of jurisprudence. Finally, the study presents the idea of the autopoietic nature of the legal system in the context of its features applicable in the EU legal framework – likewise in the constitutional state. The study concludes and presents evidence that concepts of the rule of law and legalism developed in the European conception of the democratic legal state – co-creating the paradigm of the systematicity of law in force since the beginning of the 20th century – are reflected in practice by the phenomenon of the legal system’s autopoieticity and autonomy based on social contextuality of law.
Beatrice D., The Roman Law and the Construction, “Debreceni Yogi Műhely” 2010, no. 1.
Bingham T., The Rule of Law, “The Cambridge Law Journal” 2007, no. 1.
Cottingham J., Cartesian Autonomy, in: Mind, Method and Morality: Essays in Honour of Anthony Kenny, eds. J. Cottingham, P. Hacker, New York 2010.
Davis G., Magna Carta. Translated by G.R.C. Davis, 1963, https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Magna_Carta_ (trans._Davis) (accessed: 1.07.2024).
Epstein S., Quorum in the People's Assembly in Classical Athens, “Classica et Medieaevalia. Danish Journal of Philology and History” 2009, vol. 60.
Fiss O., The Autonomy of Law, “Yale Journal of International Law” 2001, no. 1.
Głażewski M., Teoria systemów autopojetycznych Niklasa Luhmanna – między metafizyką a metabiologią, “Przegląd Pedagogiczny” 2009, no. 1.
Gromski W., Autonomia prawa jako funkcja kultury prawnej, in: Z zagadnień teorii i filozofii prawa. Autonomia prawa, ed. W. Gromski, Wrocław 2001.
Hart H., The Concept of Law, New York 1961.
Kelsen H., Reine Rechtslehre. Studienausgabe der 1. Auflage 1934, Mohr Siebeck Tubingen 2008.
Kumm M., The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty, “European Law Journal”2005, vol. 11, no. 3.
Lamentowicz W., The Emergence of the Legal Order, “Studia Iuridica Toruniensia” 2019, no. 23.
Lempert R., The Autonomy of Law: Two Visions Compared, in: Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society, ed. G. Teubner, European University Institute – Series A 8. Berlin, de Gruyter, 1988.
Letsas G., The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy, Faculty of Laws – University College London, 2012
Luisi P., Autopoiesis: A Review and a Reappraisal, “Naturwissenschaften” 2003, no. 90.
Magen A., Pech L., The Rule of Law and the European Union. Handbook on the Rule of Law, Edward Elgar Publishing 2018.
Nonet P., Selznick P., Law and Society in Transition. Towards Responsive Law, New York 2017.
O'Connor T., Emergent Properties, in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), ed. E. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/properties-emergent/ (accessed: 1.07.2024).
Ovadek M., The Rule of Law in the EU: Many Ways Forward but Only One Way to Stand Still?, “Journal of European Integration” 2018, vol. 40, no. 4.
Palmisano G., Making the Charter of Fundamental Rights a Living Instrument, Brill Nijhof 2014.
Pichlak M., Tożsamość prawa w juryscentrystycznej wizji praktyki prawniczej, in: Perspektywy juryscentryzmu, eds. P. Kaczmarek, P. Jabłoński, M. Pichlak, M. Paździora, Wrocław 2011.
Rasmussen M., Martinsen D., EU Constitutionalisation Revisited: Redressing a Central Assumption in European Studies, “European Law Journal. Review of European Law in Context” 2019, no. 3.
Raz J., The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of a Legal System. Oxford University Press 1980.
Reimann M., A Monument of Legal Learning: Anglo-American Perspectives on the German Civil Code, in: Law and Justice in a Multistate World: Essays in Honor of Arthur T. von Mehren, eds. J. Nafziger, S. Symeonides, Brill 2002.
Richards D., Rights and Autonomy, “Ethics” 1981, no. 1.
Schambeck H., Nauka prawa Hansa Kelsena, “Studia Iuridica Toruniensia” 2011, vol. 8.
Sourdin T., Judges, Technology and Artificial Intelligence. The Artificial Judge, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2021.
Teubner G., Autopoiesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg, “Law and Society Review” 1984, vol. 18, no. 2.
Teubner G., Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society, de Gruyter, New York 1988.
Teubner G., Law as an Autopoietic System, Oxford 1993.
Wroblewski J., Sądowe stosowanie prawa, Warszawa 1988.
Zeleny M., What is Autopoiesis, in: Autopoiesis: A Theory of Living Organisation, Elsevier North Holland, New York 1981.
Zieliński M., Derywacyjna koncepcja wykładni jako koncepcja zintegrowana, “Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2006, no. 3.
Zirk-Sadowski M., Wprowadzenie do filozofii prawa, Warszawa 2021.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council: Further strengthening the Rule of Law within the Union – Brussels, 3.4.2019 COM(2019) 163 final.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: A new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law – Brussels, 11.3.2014 COM(2014) 158 final.
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (Official Journal of the European Union L 433I).
Single European Act, Official Journal of the European Communities 1987, L 169/1.
Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (Official Journal of the European Union C 310/1).
Treaty on European Union (Official Journal of the European Union C 202/17).
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 April 1978 in Tyrer v. the United Kingdom (Application No. 5856/72).
Informacje: Rocznik Administracji Publicznej, 2024, 2024 (10), s. 59-72
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Uniwersytet Wrocławski
Polska
Publikacja: 13.12.2024
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
Angielski