Problemy związane z rejestracją i identyfikacją biegłych sądowych zatrudnianych przez państwowe instytucje specjalistyczne w jednolitym sądowym systemie informatycznym
Wybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 26.08.2025
Problems of Forensic Sciences (Z Zagadnień Nauk Sądowych), 2025, 141, s. 101-117
https://doi.org/10.4467/12307483PFS.25.005.22207Autorzy
Problems with the registration and identification of forensic experts of state specialised institutions in the Unified Judiciary Information Telecommunication System
The purpose of this article is to study the problems associated with the introduction of digitalisation into forensic expert activity in Ukraine.
The methodological basis of the study was the dialectical approach of scientific knowledge of phenomena and processes in their interconnection, mutual dependence, repeatability and advance of their development, which reveals the unity of the object in its complex and diverse manifestations. The study of digitalisation for forensic activities was largely guided by such general categories of dialectics as essence and phenomenon, form and content, possibility and reality.
The issues of legal regulation of the digitalisation of forensic expert activity should be addressed in conjunction with the development of digital economy legislation. The author considers the relevant legislative provisions which affect the issues of digitalisation of forensic expert activity in the context of digital economy development.
The status of experts who are employees of state specialised institutions is ambiguous: on the one hand, an expert of a state specialised institution is personally responsible for the expert opinion provided on the matters under investigation, and on the other hand, he or she must comply with the requirements of the management of the state specialised institution where he or she works.
The court should be able to send rulings on the appointment of an expert examination both to the Unified Judiciary Information Telecommunication System e-Cabinet of a state specialised institution and to the Unified Judiciary Information Telecommunication System e-Cabinet of a particular forensic expert of a state specialised institution.
1. Development Programme “Digital strategy 2022–2025”. United Nations; 2022. Available from: https://digitalstrategy.undp.org/documents/Digital-Strategy-2022-2025-Full-Document_ENG_Interactive.pdf.
2. E-Justice: digital transformation to close the justice gap. United Nations; 2022. Available from: https://www.undp.org/publications/e-justice-digital-transformationclose-justice-gap.
3. European commission for the efficiency of justice (CEPEJ). 2022–2025 CEPEJ Action plan: “Digitalisation for a better justice”. CEPEJ(2021)12Final. 2021. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2021-12-encepej-action-plan-2022-2025-%20digitalisation-justice/1680a4cf2c.
4. Protocol Council of Europe of November 4, 1950, Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (with Protocols) (European Convention on Human Rights). Available from: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_eng.
5. Law of Ukraine on December 1, 2022 No. 2807-IX, About the National Informatization Program. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2807-20#Text.
6. Law of Ukraine on July 15, 2021 No. 1667-IX, On stimulating the development of the digital economy in Ukraine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1667-20#Text.
7. Law of Ukraine on May 22, 2003 No. 851-IV, On electronic documents and electronic document flow. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/851-15#Text.
8. Law of Ukraine on July 5, 1994 No. 80/94-ВР, On the protection of information in information and communication systems. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80/94-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text.
9. Law of Ukraine on October 5, 2017 No. 2155-VIII, On electronic identification and electronic trust services. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2155-19#Text.
10. Law of Ukraine on November 18, 2021 No. 1907-IX, On public electronic registers. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1907-20#Text.
11. Law of Ukraine on October 5, 2017 No. 2163-VIII, On the main principles of ensuring cyber security of Ukraine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2163-19#n24.
12. Roux C, Weyermann C. From research integrity to research relevance to advance forensic science. Forensic Sci Res. 2021;6,4,292-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1977480.
13. Barona Vilar S. Inteligencia artificial o la algoritmización de la vida y de la justicia: ¿solución o problema? Rev Boliv Derecho. 2019;28,18-49. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10550/72542.
14. Planchadell-Gargallo A. Breves apuntes sobre digitalización del proceso penal español a la luz de la reciente reforma. Rev Bras Direito Pro. 2024;10,2. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.992.
15. Xavier P. R. S. Smartjusticia, proceso y prueba: especial referencia a su uso en los tribunales de apelación. Rev Bras Direito Pro. 2024;10,2. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.1006.
16. Vicoli D. Editorial do dossiê “Digitalização e justiça penal: aspectos procedimentais” – uma introdução geral. Rev Bras Direito Pro. 2024;10,2. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.1061.
17. Sakowicz A, Zieliński S. Em direção a um sistema de justiça criminal digitalizado: exemplo da Polônia. Rev Bras Direito Pro. 2024;10,2. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.995.
18. Rossner M, Tait D. Presence and participation in a virtual court. Criminol Crim Justice. 2023;23,1,135-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211017372.
19. Gori P, Pahladsingh, A. Fundamental rights under Covid-19: an European perspective on videoconferencing in court. ERA Forum. 2021;21,561-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00643-5.
20. Lach A, Klubińska M, Badowiec R. Conflito de interesses entre testemunha e pessoa acusada em uma persecução penal justa: – a oitiva por videoconferência pode ser um instrumento para solução? Rev Bras Direito Pro. 2022;8,3. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.737.
21. Martynenko N. Areas of modernization of the system of training and certification of forensic experts in Ukraine based on the adaptation of foreign experience. Forensic Sci Res. 2024;owae033. https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae033.
22. Martynenko N. Digitalisation of forensic expert activity in Ukraine: Organisational and legal framework. Forensic Sci Int Synergy. 2025;10,100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100578.
23. Martynenko N. Directions for improving the financial support of forensic expert forensic activity in Ukraine with account of positive foreign experience. Forensic Sci International: Synergy. 2024;9,100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100565.
24. Martynenko N. Methodological support for forensic science in the USA and Ukraine: a comparative study. Forensic Sci Int Synergy. 2025;10,100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100571.
25. Law of Ukraine on October 3, 2017 No. 2147-VIII, On amendments to the Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2147%D0%B0-19#Text.
26. Judicial power of Ukraine. Announcement on the creation and maintenance of the operation of three subsystems (modules) of EUITS; 2021. Available from: https://court.gov.ua/press/news/1173657.
27. Decision Supreme Council of Justice on August 17, 2021 No. 1845/0/15-21. On the approval of the Regulation on the procedure for the functioning of individual subsystems of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/en/v1845910-21?lang=uk#Text.
28. Law of Ukraine on June 29 No. 3200-IX; 2023, On amendments to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding mandatory registration and use of electronic cabinets in the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System or its separate subsystem (module) that ensures the exchange of documents. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3200-20#Text.
29. Law of Ukraine on November 6, 1991 No. 1798-XII, Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12#n1777.
30. Law of Ukraine on March 18, 2004 No. 1618-IV, Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#n6136.
31. Law of Ukraine on July 6, 2005 No. 2747-IV, Administrative Judicial Code of Ukraine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#n9666.
32. Law of Ukraine on April 13, 2012 No. 4651-VI, Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text.
33. Law of Ukraine on May 23, 2024 No. 3755-IX, On making changes to the Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine regarding the improvement of participation in a court session in videoconference mode. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3755-20#Text.
34. La solution de dématérialisation des échanges entre les intervenants. Procédure civile – expertise judiciaire. Opalexe. Available from: https://auth.opalexe.fr/realms/broker/protocol/openid-connect/auth?client_id=front-legacy-client&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.opalexe.fr%2F&state=03c4117d-bce7-4600-8a76-3b84d8974960&response_mode=fragment&response_type=code&scope=openid&nonce=817e8874-5227-4269-8d42-9e6b7361cc07.
35. O palexe. Oodrive. Available from: https://www.oodrive.com/fr/produits/opalexe/#.
36. Real Decreto-ley 6/2023, de 19 de diciembre, 2023, por el que se aprueban medidas urgentes para la ejecución del Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia en materia de servicio público de justicia, función pública, régimen local y mecenazgo. Available from: https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2023-25758.
37. User manual of the ECITS Electronic Cabinet. Judiciary of Ukraine; 2024. Available from: https://wiki-ccs.court.gov.ua/w/%D0%86%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B0_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%83_%D0%84%D0%A1%D0%86%D0%A2%D0%A1.
38. Monitoring report 2023. Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. Directorate of Justice and Criminal Justice (by the resp. ed. candidate of science O. M. Oliynyka). Kyiv; 2024. p. 383. Available from: https://minjust.gov.ua/files/general/2024/02/22/20240222084437-42.pdf.
39. Law of Ukraine on February 25, 1994 No. 4038-XII, On forensic examination. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12#Text.
40. Nakaz Ministry of Justice of Ukraine on October 8, 1998 No. 53/5, On the approval of the Instructions on the appointment and conduct of forensic examinations and expert studies and Scientific and methodological recommendations on the preparation and appointment of forensic examinations and expert studies. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#Text.
41. Law of Ukraine on April 5, 2001 No. 2341-III, Criminal Code of Ukraine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text.
42. Nakaz Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine on July 17, 2017 No. 591, On the approval of the Instructions for the organization of conducting and registration of expert proceedings in the subdivisions of the Expert Service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1024-17#Text.
43. Nakaz Security Service of Ukraine on May 29, 2015 No. 371, On the approval of the Instructions on the appointment and conduct of forensic examinations and expert studies in the system of the Security Service of Ukraine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0738-15#Text.
44. Martynenko N. Theoretical prerequisites and applied aspects of the creation of a single qualification and disciplinary body in the field of forensic expert activity in Ukraine. Problems of Forensic Sciences. 2024;138,93-110. https://doi.org/10.4467/12307483PFS.24.006.20179.
45. Nakaz Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine on November 18, 2013 No. 1109, On the approval of the Instructions on the procedure for conducting forensic examinations and expert studies of documents by the Main Expert Forensic Center of the State Border Service of Ukraine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z2086-13#n41.
46. Instructions Ministry of Health of Ukraine on January 17, 1995 No. 6, Instructions on conducting a forensic medical examination. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0254-95#Text.
47. Rules Ministry of Health of Ukraine on January 17, 1995 No. 6, Rules for forensic medical examination (examination) of dead bodies in the forensic medical examination bureau. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0257-95#Text.
48. Order Ministry of Health of Ukraine on May 8, 2018 No. 865, On the approval of the Procedure for conducting a forensic psychiatric examination. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0719-18#Text.
49. Kaluzhna О. Politics or law: what is more in the approaches of public expert monopoly? Probl Leg. 2018;140,104-120. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.140.123451.
50. Shunevich K. Models of the organization and conduct of forensic examination in criminal proceedings in European countries and in Ukraine: dissertation. PHD field of knowledge 08 “Law”: 12.00.08. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University; 2023. https://lnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/diss_Shunevych.pdf.
51. Martynenko N, Domin D. (ed.). An innovative approach to creating a list of types of forensic examinations and expert specialties. Expert assessments in decision making: risks and safety. Tallinn: Scientific Route OÜ; 2023. p. 5-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.21303/978-9916-9850-2-1.ch1.
Informacje: Problems of Forensic Sciences (Z Zagadnień Nauk Sądowych), 2025, 141, s. 101-117
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Department of Law and Public Administration,
Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture
Publikacja: 26.08.2025
Otrzymano: 24.02.2025
Zaakceptowano: 22.05.2025
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
Angielski, PolskiLiczba wyświetleń: 806
Liczba pobrań: 435