Efekt ofiary zidentyfikowanej – analiza utylitarna i rekomendacje zmian prawnych
Wybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEThe Identified Victim Effect - Utilitarian Analysis and Policy Recommendations
Data publikacji: 19.12.2018
Principia, 2018, Tom 65, s. 69-89
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843887PI.18.003.9886Autorzy
The Identified Victim Effect - Utilitarian Analysis and Policy Recommendations
The identified victim effect refers to a psychological bias of a much greater willingness to help identified victims, as opposed to statistical ones. The aim of this article is to assess what we morally ought to do in the light of this effect, from the point of view of utilitarian ethics. What decision-making rule ought to be established? Ought we to always help identified victims or statistical ones? I argue for a rule that constitutes a middle ground between the two extremes. Next, using the example of the Polish non-governmental sector and with the rule in mind, I outline legal changes that would result in a much higher overall net utility. The first change concerns the rules of the so-called percentage tax designation mechanism. The second concerns the conditions NGOs have to meet in order to receive public funding of their activities.
Bohnet, Iris, and Bruno S. Frey. 1999. “The Sound of Silence in Prisoner’s Dilemma and Dictator Games.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 38 (1): 43–57.
Flanagan, Owen. 1993. Varieties of Moral Personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fundacja Dzieciom “Zdążyć z Pomocą”. 2018. “Przekaż 1% podatku”. http://dzieciom.pl/chce-pomoc/przekaz-nam-1-procent.
Hare, Caspar. 2012. “Obligations to Merely Statistical People.” The Journal of Philosophy 12: 378–390.
Hooker, Brad. 2015. “Rule Consequentialism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Winter 2016
Edition. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/consequentialism-rule/
Jenni, Karen E., and George Loewenstein. 1997. “Explaining the ‘Identifiable Victim Effect.’” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14: 235–257.
Kogut, Tehila, and Ilana Ritov. 2005. “The ‘Identified Victim’ Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual?” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18 (3): 157–167.
Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna, Ilana Ritov, and Tehila Kogut. 2017. “Law and Identifiability.” Indiana Law Journal 92 (2): 505–555.
Loewenstein, George, and Deborah A. Small. 2007. “The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring.” Review of General Psychology 11 (2): 112–126.
Milanovic, Branko. 2010. The Haves and the Have-Nots: A Brief and Idiosyncratic History of Global Inequality. New York: Basic Books.
Ministry of Finance. 2016. Informacja dotycząca kwot 1% należnego podatku dochodowego od osób fizycznych przekazanych organizacjom pożytku publicznego z rozliczenia za 2015 rok. https://finanse-arch.mf.gov.pl/documents/766655/5747316/Wykaz+organizacji+po%C5%BCytku+publicznego%2C+kt%C3%B3re+w+2016+otrzyma%C5%82y+kwoty+1+proc.
Rachels, Stuart. 2014. “The Immorality of Having Children.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3): 567–82.
Schelling, Thomas. 1984. “The Life You Save May Be Your Own.” In Choice and Consequence, 127–162. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 2015. “Consequentialism.” In The Stan- ford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Winter 2015 Edition. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/consequentialism/
Small, Deborah A. 2015. “On the Psychology of the Identifiable Victim Effect.” In Identified versus Statistical Lives: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, edited by I. Glenn Cohen, Norman Daniels, and Nir Eyal, 13–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Small, Deborah A., George Loewenstein, and Paul Slovic. 2007. “Sympathy and Callousness: The Impact of Deliberative Thought on Donations to Identifiable and Statistical Victims.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102 (2): 143–53.
Small, Deborah A, and George Loewenstein. 2003. “Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26 (1): 5–16.
Stanisławski, Piotr. 2013. “Sprywatyzowany pożytek publiczny.” http://www.niepelnosprawni.pl/ledge/x/165691
Stowarzyszenie Klon/Jawor. 2016. „Kondycja sektora organizacji pozarządowych w Polsce 2015. Raport z badań.” http://fakty.ngo.pl/files/wiadomosci.ngo.pl/public/civicpedia/Raport_Klon_ Kondycja_2015.pdf
Załuski, Wojciech. 2018. “The Moral Status of Helping and the Identified Victim Effect.” Principia 65: 49-68.
Żuradzki, Tomasz. 2015. “The Preference Toward Identified Victims and Rescue Duties.” The American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2): 25–27.
Informacje: Principia, 2018, Tom 65, s. 69-89
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
The Identified Victim Effect - Utilitarian Analysis and Policy Recommendations
Wydział Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków
Publikacja: 19.12.2018
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Finansowanie artykułu:
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 2740
Liczba pobrań: 2677