The “Kafkaesque” in Judicial Reasoning: A Comparative Review of American and European Practices
Wybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 26.06.2025
Copernican Journal of Law, 2025, No. 2 (1/2025), s. 9-18
https://doi.org/10.71042/CJL01202501Autorzy
The “Kafkaesque” in Judicial Reasoning: A Comparative Review of American and European Practices
“Kafkaesque” perspective in judicial reasoning means, that law lacks intrinsic content. From this point of view, the conclusion can be drawn that both law and justice are empty in the context of Kafka’s reality. Just because of these essential characters, they exist only due to their internal paradoxes or reification. As a result, something with no real form or content acquires a “phantom objectivity” through its highly formalized and bureaucratic form which are the main features of a “Kafkaesque” situation. Therefore, justice and the law become reduced to their result or verdict, possessing no real content until they are presented to a person involved. Therefore, a law that Kafka writes about is given in their experience to people who obey the law but have no knowledge of its content. So, such an emptiness of law is one of the characteristics of “Kafkaesque”. That’s why for outsiders, the law is irrational and inaccessible. On the other hand, it would not be impossible to recognize that such a nightmare situation needs to be revealed to be avoided. In this regard, the method of deconstruction only performs functions of diagnosing law systems by identifying their becoming empty of any content. However, it needs to be considered that deconstruction is often mistaken for destruction. However, according to the view presented in this article, deconstruction means exposing the underlying meanings both as juridical practices and their theories. This is one of the reasons why “Kafkaesque” performs the function of deconstruction towards the law and the legal system exposing their very content. The function of legal deconstruction largely determines the legal value of “Kafkaesque”. Moreover, beyond deconstruction, it also embodies a (re) constructive function, manifested in promoting new principles of law.
Airaksinen, T. (2019). Kafka: Crime and punishment. Ethics & Bioethics, 9(3–4), pp. 148–158. https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2019-0016
Avbelj, M., Fontanelli, F., & Martinico, G. (Eds.). (2014). Kadi on Trial: A Multifaceted Analysis of the Kadi Trial. Abingdon: Routledge.
Brown, D. K. (2014). What Can Kafka Tell Us About American Criminal Justice? (reviewing Robert P. Burns, Kafka’s Law: The Trial and American Criminal Justice). Texas Law Review, 93, pp. 487–503.
Buonamano, R. (2016). Kafka and Legal Critique. Griffith Law Review, 25, pp. 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2016.1273167
Burns, R. P. (2014). Kafka’s Law: “The Trial” and American Criminal Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kemper, C. (2019). Kafkaesque AI? Legal Decision-Making in the Era of Machine Learning. Intellectual Property and Technology Law, 24(2), pp. 251–294. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/4jzk2
Kirchberger, L. (1986). Franz Kafka’s Use of Law in Fiction. A New Interpretation of “In der Strafkolonie”, “Der Prozess”, and “Das Schloss”. New York, Berne, Frankfurt/ M.: P. Lang.
Kochenov, D. (2010). Two Sovereign States vs. A Human Being: ECJ as a Guardian of Arbitrariness in Citizenship Matters. In: J. Shaw (Ed.), Has the European Court of Justice Challenged the Member State Sovereignty in Nationality Law (pp. 11–16). EUI RSCAS Working Paper No. 2011/62. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1593220
Kokott, J., & Sobotta, C. (2012). The Kadi case – constitutional core values and international law – finding the balance? European Journal of International Law, 23(4), pp. 1015–1024. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs063
Kosop, R. J. C., & de Souza-Lima, J. E. (2017). As Intensidades Kafkians: Reflexoes Acerca do Desencanto Juridico (Kafkaesque Intensities: Reflections on Legal Disenchantment). Revista de Direito, Arte e Literatura, 3(1), pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9911/2017.v3i1.1823
Mason, L. (2014). The intractably unknowable nature of law: Kadi, Kafka, and the law’s competing claims to authority. In: M. Avbelj, F. Fontanelli, & G. Martinico (Eds.), Kadi on Trial: A Multifaceted Analysis of the Kadi Trial (pp. 77–91), Abingdon: Routledge.
McCartney, J. (2019). The Kafkaesque nightmare of British justice Defendants are treated like Josef K in The Trial. Retrieved October 23, 2024, from: https://unherd.com/2019/08/the-kafkaesque-nightmare-of-british-justice/
Murphy, S. (2019). Carl Beech, VIP paedophile ring accuser, jailed for 18 years. Retrieved October 23, 2024, from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/26/carlbeech-vip-paedophile-ring-accuser-jailed-for-18-years
Potter Jr, P. B. (2005). Ordeal by trial: Judicial references to the nightmare world of Franz Kafka. Pierce Law Review, 3(2), pp. 195–330.
Roberts, F. I. (2023). De Kafka a la judicializacion de la sociedad: deberes y derechos en la posmodernidad (From Kafka to the Judicialization of Society: Duties and Rights in Postmodernity). Revista de Derecho de la UCB, 7(12), pp. 11–51. https://lawreview.ucb.edu.bo/a/article/view/85
Shoenberger, A. E. (2004). The European view of American justice. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 36(2), pp. 603–611.
Varnay, E. (2019). Judicial passivism at the European Court of Justice? Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 60(2), pp. 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2019.00009
York, J. (2021). Kafkaesque’ row over 22 illegal wind turbines in south France. Retrieved October 25, 2024, from: https://www.connexionfrance.com/article/French-news/Kafkaesque-row-over-22-illegal-wind-turbines-near-Sainte-Victoire-mountain
Informacje: Copernican Journal of Law, 2025, No. 2 (1/2025), s. 9-18
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Publikacja: 26.06.2025
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-ND 4.0
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1288
Liczba pobrań: 874