On the Scientific Nature of Legal Scholarship
Wybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 12.2024
Copernican Journal of Law, 2024, No. 1, s. 39-51
https://doi.org/10.71042/CJL01202403Autorzy
On the Scientific Nature of Legal Scholarship
The ‘scientific’ nature of legal scholarship represents a long-term, more than 150-year-long controversy in which it is often questioned whether legal scholarship is really a science. In this paper, we try to compare the features of unquestioned ‘real’ sciences (meaning specifically natural sciences), with the features of legal scholarship, in order to assess to what extent legal scholarship meets the standards of science accepted in natural sciences. We prove that some features of proper scientificity are thereby not being met by the natural sciences themselves.
Aarnio, A. (2011). Essays on the Doctrinal Study of Law. Dordrecht: Springer.
Dalberg-Larsen, J. (1983). On bridging the so-called gap between normative legal dogmatics and empirical-theoretical social science. In: A. Peczenik, L. Lindahl, B. Van Roermund (eds.). Theory of Legal Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Gestel, R. Van, Micklitz H.-W., Poiares Maduro, M. (2012). Introduction. In: R. Van Gestel, H.-W. Micklitz, M. Poiares Maduro (eds.). Methodology in the New Legal World. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.
Harvánek, J. (2008). Teorie práva (Theory of Law). Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk.
Hesselink, M. (2009). A European Legal Method? On European Private Law and Scientific Method. European Law Journal, 15 (1), 20–45.
Holländer, P. (2012). Philosophy of law. 2nd ed. Pilsen: Aleš Čeněk.
Honerkamp, J. (2017). Die Idee der Wissenschaft: Ihr Schicksal in Physik, Rechtswissenschaft und Theologie (The Idea of Science: Its Fate in Physics, Law, and Theology). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Honsell, H., Mayer-Maly, T. (2015). Rechtswissenschaft: Eine Einführung in das Recht und seine Grundlagen (Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Law and Its Foundations). 6th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Houbová, D. (2003). Meze logické interpretace právních norem (Czech Legal Thought and Logic – Past and Perspectives). In: České právní myšlení a logika – minulost a perspektivy. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Jestaedt, M. (2017). Rechtswissenschaft als normative Disziplin (Jurisprudence as a Normative Discipline). In: E. Hilgendorf, J. C. Joerden (eds.). Handbuch Rechtsphilosophie, pp. 267–274. Dordrecht: Springer.
Jestaedt, M. (2011). Was die Reine Rechtslehre nicht leistet – Anspruch und Horizont einer beschränkten Theorie (What the Pure Theory of Law Does Not Achieve – The Claim and Horizon of a Limited Theory). Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 66, pp. 201–213.
Knapp, V. (1995). Teorie práva (Theory of Law). Praha: C. H. Beck.
Kosinka, J. P. (2018). Vědeckost právní vědy (Scientificity of Legal Scholarship). Distance, 2. Retrieved November 8, 2024, from https://www.distance.cz/ro%C4%8Dn%C3%ADk-2018/2%C4%8D%C3%ADslo/v%C4%9Bdeckost-pr%C3%A1vn%C3%ADv%C4%9Bdy
Leith, P., Morison, J. (2005). Can Jurisprudence Without Empiricism Ever be a Science? In: S. Coyle, G. Pavlakos (eds.). Jurisprudence or Legal Science? A Debate about the Nature of Legal Theory, pp. 147–167. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Melzer, F. (2010). Metodologie nalézání práva: Úvod do právní argumentace (Methodology of Finding the Law: An Introduction to Legal Argumentation). Praha: C.H. Beck.
Rottleuthner, H. (2017). Rechtswissenschaft als Sozialwissenschaft (Jurisprudence as a Social Science). In: E. Hilgendorf, J. C. Joerden (eds.). Handbuch Rechtsphilosophie, pp. 264–266. Dordrecht: Springer.
Schmidt, M., Taliga, M. (2013). Philosophy of natural sciences. Bratislava: Aleph.
Varga, C. (2012). The Paradigms of Legal Thinking. Budapest: Szent István Társulat.
Informacje: Copernican Journal of Law, 2024, No. 1, s. 39-51
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Publikacja: 12.2024
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-ND 4.0
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
Angielski