@article{f7dc8dcd-c8c1-4bef-bac5-083c6326f184,
author = {Łukasz  Tischner},
title = {„Czy warto być czystym sceptykiem, bez domieszki?” Tajemnice „Opętanych” Witolda Gombrowicza},
journal = {Wielogłos},
volume = {2017},
number = {Numer 4 (34) 2017: Proza modernizmu},
year = {2018},
issn = {1897-1962},
pages = {63-81},keywords = {Witold Gombrowicz; Julian Ochorowicz; powieść popularna; powieść gotycka; mediumizm; psychoanaliza},
abstract = {“Is it worth being a pure sceptic, without any admixture?” Secrets of Witold Gombrowicz’s Opętani

	The article analyzes Witold Gombrowicz’s pre-war novel Opętani (Possesed). The novel was published under a pseudonym and Gombrowicz had professed to be its actual author just before he died. This long-term concealment provoked an argument about the nov- el’s artistic value. According to Maria Janion, the novel is a legitimate and important part of Gombrowicz’s writings, whereas Jerzy Jarzębski, the second major participant of the dispute, pointed out the flamboyant schematism of the text. The author of the article espouses Jarzębski’s viewpoint, although he believes Opętani to be a mediocre good book rather than a good bad book. The novelty of this interpretation lies in discovering an im- portant inspiration of Gombrowicz’s text: Julian Ochorowicz’s writings on mediumship. The author proves that Hińcz, one of the novel’s characters, was undoubtedly modeled on Ochorowicz. The author also states that Gombrowicz composed the plot of the novel under the influence of some accounts of Ochorowicz’s mediumistic experiments. The ar- ticle suggests that the poetics of popular fiction and gothic novel might hide some more sophisticated psychological meanings, but they are revoked by the schematism of Opętani to eventually come to the fore in Ślub (The Marriage) and Pornografia.
	 },
doi = {10.4467/2084395XWI.17.028.8535},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/wieloglos/artykul/czy-warto-byc-czystym-sceptykiem-bez-domieszki-tajemnice-opetanych-witolda-gombrowicza}
}