@article{ed9e41ba-2219-407b-9244-b9ed1e5821eb,
author = {Damian Herda},
title = {Arrangement classifiers, collocations, and near-synonymy: A corpus-based study with reference to Polish},
journal = {Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis},
volume = {2020},
number = {Volume 137, Issue 4},
year = {2020},
issn = {1897-1059},
pages = {245-258},keywords = {arrangement classifiers; collocations; near-synonymy; lexical semantics; Polish},
abstract = {The aim of this paper is to contrast the near-synonymous Polish classifiers kupa ‘heap’, sterta ‘pile’, and stos ‘stack’, all of which encode upward-oriented arrangements of objects or substances and thus prototypically combine with concrete inanimate nouns, by means of a collocational analysis conducted on naturally-occurring data derived from the Na­tional Corpus of Polish. The results of the empirical investigation point to a tendency for kupa ‘heap’ to combine predominantly with mass nouns denoting amorphous, frequently natural, stuff, whereas sterta ‘pile’ and stos ‘stack’ exhibit a pronounced predilection for count N2-collocates referring to artefacts. In a similar vein, while both sterta ‘pile’ and stos ‘stack’ typically stand for aggregates formed by a volitional human agent, it is not infrequent for kupa ‘heap’ to classify portions of substances whose shape is a result of the forces of nature or merely constitutes a by-effect of activities intended to achieve goals other than arranging stuff into units. What differentiates between sterta ‘pile’ and stos ‘stack’, however, is that constructional solidity appears a more salient feature of the latter item, hence its capability of applying to vertical collections of entities marked by an orderly internal structure.},
doi = {10.4467/20834624SL.20.020.12982},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/studia-linguistica-uic/artykul/arrangement-classifiers-collocations-and-near-synonymy-a-corpus-based-study-with-reference-to-polish}
}