@article{dc977ffa-7a2b-4526-9c2d-f578e8490583, author = {Andrzej Niewiadomski}, title = {Jeszcze jeden głos (po osiemdziesięciu latach) o Trzech zimach}, journal = {Wielogłos}, volume = {2018}, number = {Numer 2 (36) 2018}, year = {2018}, issn = {1897-1962}, pages = {15-33},keywords = {katastrofizm; poezja czysta; neosymbolizm; Czesław Miłosz; wczesna nowoczesność ;catastrophism; pure poetry; neosymbolism; early modernism}, abstract = {One More Thought (After Eighty Years) on Three Winters (Trzy zimy)   In the current research considerations devoted to the early work of Czesław Miłosz, the importance of his second poetic collection, Trzy zimy (in English: Three Winters), has been repeatedly emphasized. However, there was no analysis that would focus on attempts to define more precisely the meaning of Trzy zimy in the context of development processes within Polish literary modernism.The article is an interpretative approach concentrating not on individual poems, but on the whole creative intention of Milosz from 1936. This volume, seen as an ingeniously composed whole, and read in confrontation with the author's programmatic statements, presents itself as an important caesura closing the stage of early modernist Polish poetry, benefiting from various aesthetic inspirations and producing a somewhat modified version of "pure poetry" compared to the proposals of Western literature}, doi = {10.4467/2084395XWI.18.017.9962}, url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/wieloglos/artykul/jeszcze-jeden-glos-po-osiemdziesieciu-latach-o-trzech-zimach} }